↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : MGT086+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:20:00 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 78.65s 79.00s
% Output   : Refutation 78.65s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : MGT086+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 14:22:17 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 78.65/79.00  
% 78.65/79.00  SPASS V 3.9 
% 78.65/79.00  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 78.65/79.00  % SZS status Theorem
% 78.65/79.00  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 78.65/79.00  SPASS derived 48473 clauses, backtracked 15 clauses, performed 14 splits and kept 13850 clauses.
% 78.65/79.00  SPASS allocated 132233 KBytes.
% 78.65/79.00  SPASS spent	0:1:16.12 on the problem.
% 78.65/79.00  		0:00:00.06 for the input.
% 78.65/79.00  		0:00:00.06 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 78.65/79.00  		0:00:01.22 for inferences.
% 78.65/79.00  		0:00:00.63 for the backtracking.
% 78.65/79.00  		0:1:13.24 for the reduction.
% 78.65/79.00  
% 78.65/79.00  
% 78.65/79.00  Here is a proof with depth 4, length 29 :
% 78.65/79.00  % SZS output start Refutation
% 78.65/79.00  9[0:Inp] ||  -> less(v0,v200)*r.
% 78.65/79.00  13[0:Inp] ||  -> less(v200,v400)*r.
% 78.65/79.00  18[0:Inp] ||  -> less(v600,v800)*r.
% 78.65/79.00  28[0:Inp] || equal(v800,v600)** -> .
% 78.65/79.00  34[0:Inp] || equal(u,v)* -> leq(u,v).
% 78.65/79.00  35[0:Inp] || less(u,v)* -> leq(u,v).
% 78.65/79.00  38[0:Inp] || in_lopen(u,v,w)* -> less(v,u).
% 78.65/79.00  39[0:Inp] || in_lopen(u,v,w)* -> leq(u,w).
% 78.65/79.00  48[0:Inp] || leq(u,v)*+ leq(v,u)* -> equal(v,u).
% 78.65/79.00  51[0:Inp] || leq(u,v)* leq(v,w)* -> leq(u,w)*.
% 78.65/79.00  53[0:Inp] || less(u,v) leq(v,w) -> in_lopen(v,u,w)*.
% 78.65/79.00  69[0:Inp] || leq(v800,u)+ in_lopen(v,v0,v200) in_lopen(v,v0,v400)* -> in_lopen(u,v0,v600)*.
% 78.65/79.00  98[0:EqR:34.0] ||  -> leq(u,u)*.
% 78.65/79.00  136[0:Res:18.0,35.0] ||  -> leq(v600,v800)*r.
% 78.65/79.00  143[0:Res:13.0,35.0] ||  -> leq(v200,v400)*r.
% 78.65/79.00  332[0:Res:136.0,48.0] || leq(v800,v600)*l -> equal(v800,v600).
% 78.65/79.00  362[0:MRR:332.1,28.0] || leq(v800,v600)*l -> .
% 78.65/79.00  440[1:Spt:69.0,69.3] || leq(v800,u) -> in_lopen(u,v0,v600)*.
% 78.65/79.00  443[1:Res:440.1,39.0] || leq(v800,u)* -> leq(u,v600).
% 78.65/79.00  934[1:Res:98.0,443.0] ||  -> leq(v800,v600)*l.
% 78.65/79.00  943[1:MRR:934.0,362.0] ||  -> .
% 78.65/79.00  944[1:Spt:943.0,69.1,69.2] || in_lopen(u,v0,v200) in_lopen(u,v0,v400)* -> .
% 78.65/79.00  946[1:Res:53.2,944.1] || less(v0,u) leq(u,v400) in_lopen(u,v0,v200)* -> .
% 78.65/79.00  947[1:MRR:946.0,38.1] || leq(u,v400) in_lopen(u,v0,v200)* -> .
% 78.65/79.00  948[1:Res:53.2,947.1] || less(v0,u) leq(u,v200) leq(u,v400)* -> .
% 78.65/79.00  36243[0:CRe:51.1,143.0] || leq(u,v200)*+ -> leq(u,v400)*.
% 78.65/79.00  36261[1:MRR:948.2,36243.1] || less(v0,u) leq(u,v200)* -> .
% 78.65/79.00  51293[1:Res:98.0,36261.1] || less(v0,v200)*r -> .
% 78.65/79.00  51384[1:MRR:51293.0,9.0] ||  -> .
% 78.65/79.00  % SZS output end Refutation
% 78.65/79.00  Formulae used in the proof : ord_v0_v200 ord_v200_v400 ord_v600_v800 distinct leq_def less_implies_leq in_lopen leq_antisym leq_trans odrl462
% 78.65/79.00  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------