↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : MGT089+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:20:01 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 0.54s
% Output   : Refutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    6 (   4 unt;   0 nHn;   6 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    8 (   0 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(22,axiom,
    ~ prec(v5,v5,o,o),
    file('MGT089+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(24,axiom,
    ( ~ equal(u,v)
    | leq(u,v) ),
    file('MGT089+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(44,axiom,
    ( ~ leq(u,v)
    | prec(u,v,o,o) ),
    file('MGT089+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(74,plain,
    ~ leq(v5,v5),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[44,22]),
    [iquote('0:Res:44.1,22.0')] ).

cnf(85,plain,
    leq(u,u),
    inference(eqr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[24]),
    [iquote('0:EqR:24.0')] ).

cnf(86,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unc,[status(thm)],[85,74]),
    [iquote('0:UnC:85.0,74.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MGT089+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.08/0.34  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 14:04:17 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.21/0.54  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.21/0.54  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/0.54  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.21/0.54  SPASS derived 12 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 74 clauses.
% 0.21/0.54  SPASS allocated 98067 KBytes.
% 0.21/0.54  SPASS spent	0:00:00.17 on the problem.
% 0.21/0.54  		0:00:00.06 for the input.
% 0.21/0.54  		0:00:00.06 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.21/0.54  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.21/0.54  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.21/0.54  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  
% 0.21/0.54  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 6 :
% 0.21/0.54  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.54  Formulae used in the proof : odrl604 leq_def prec_oo
% 0.21/0.54  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------