↑ Up

Metis---2.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Metis---2.4
% Problem  : MGT090+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:16:17 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.45s 0.75s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   49 (  20 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  106 (  27 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  111 (  54   ~;  38   |;  11   &)
%                                         (   7 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   54 (   0 sgn  39   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(less_implies_leq,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( less(X,Y)
     => leq(X,Y) ) ).

fof(wf_eq,axiom,
    ! [V,InfD,SupD] :
      ( wf(eq,V,InfD,SupD)
    <=> ( leq(InfD,V)
        & leq(V,SupD) ) ) ).

fof(wf_lt,axiom,
    ! [V,InfD,SupD] :
      ( wf(lt,V,InfD,SupD)
    <=> ( leq(InfD,V)
        & leq(V,SupD)
        & V != InfD ) ) ).

fof(ord_v0_v600,axiom,
    less(v0,v600) ).

fof(ord_v600_v1200,axiom,
    less(v600,v1200) ).

fof(distinct,axiom,
    ( v0 != v600
    & v0 != v1200
    & v600 != v1200 ) ).

fof(odrl613,conjecture,
    wf(lt,v600,v0,v1200) ).

fof(subgoal_0,plain,
    wf(lt,v600,v0,v1200),
    inference(strip,[],[odrl613]) ).

fof(negate_0_0,plain,
    ~ wf(lt,v600,v0,v1200),
    inference(negate,[],[subgoal_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_0,plain,
    ! [InfD,SupD,V] :
      ( ~ wf(lt,V,InfD,SupD)
    <=> ( ~ leq(InfD,V)
        | ~ leq(V,SupD)
        | V = InfD ) ),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[wf_lt]) ).

fof(normalize_0_1,plain,
    ! [InfD,SupD,V] :
      ( ~ wf(eq,V,InfD,SupD)
    <=> ( ~ leq(InfD,V)
        | ~ leq(V,SupD) ) ),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[wf_eq]) ).

fof(normalize_0_2,plain,
    ! [InfD,SupD,V] :
      ( ~ wf(eq,V,InfD,SupD)
    <=> ( ~ leq(InfD,V)
        | ~ leq(V,SupD) ) ),
    inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_1]) ).

fof(normalize_0_3,plain,
    ! [InfD,SupD,V] :
      ( ~ wf(lt,V,InfD,SupD)
    <=> ( ~ wf(eq,V,InfD,SupD)
        | V = InfD ) ),
    inference(simplify,[],[normalize_0_0,normalize_0_2]) ).

fof(normalize_0_4,plain,
    ! [InfD,SupD,V] :
      ( ~ wf(lt,V,InfD,SupD)
    <=> ( ~ wf(eq,V,InfD,SupD)
        | V = InfD ) ),
    inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_3]) ).

fof(normalize_0_5,plain,
    ! [InfD,SupD,V] :
      ( ( V != InfD
        | ~ wf(lt,V,InfD,SupD) )
      & ( ~ wf(lt,V,InfD,SupD)
        | wf(eq,V,InfD,SupD) )
      & ( ~ wf(eq,V,InfD,SupD)
        | V = InfD
        | wf(lt,V,InfD,SupD) ) ),
    inference(clausify,[],[normalize_0_4]) ).

fof(normalize_0_6,plain,
    ! [InfD,SupD,V] :
      ( ~ wf(eq,V,InfD,SupD)
      | V = InfD
      | wf(lt,V,InfD,SupD) ),
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_0_5]) ).

fof(normalize_0_7,plain,
    less(v0,v600),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[ord_v0_v600]) ).

fof(normalize_0_8,plain,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ~ less(X,Y)
      | leq(X,Y) ),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[less_implies_leq]) ).

fof(normalize_0_9,plain,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ~ less(X,Y)
      | leq(X,Y) ),
    inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_8]) ).

fof(normalize_0_10,plain,
    less(v600,v1200),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[ord_v600_v1200]) ).

fof(normalize_0_11,plain,
    ! [InfD,SupD,V] :
      ( ( ~ wf(eq,V,InfD,SupD)
        | leq(InfD,V) )
      & ( ~ wf(eq,V,InfD,SupD)
        | leq(V,SupD) )
      & ( ~ leq(InfD,V)
        | ~ leq(V,SupD)
        | wf(eq,V,InfD,SupD) ) ),
    inference(clausify,[],[normalize_0_2]) ).

fof(normalize_0_12,plain,
    ! [InfD,SupD,V] :
      ( ~ leq(InfD,V)
      | ~ leq(V,SupD)
      | wf(eq,V,InfD,SupD) ),
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_0_11]) ).

fof(normalize_0_13,plain,
    ( v0 != v1200
    & v0 != v600
    & v600 != v1200 ),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[distinct]) ).

fof(normalize_0_14,plain,
    v0 != v600,
    inference(conjunct,[],[normalize_0_13]) ).

fof(normalize_0_15,plain,
    ~ wf(lt,v600,v0,v1200),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[negate_0_0]) ).

cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
    ( ~ wf(eq,V,InfD,SupD)
    | V = InfD
    | wf(lt,V,InfD,SupD) ),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_6]) ).

cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
    ( ~ wf(eq,v600,v0,v1200)
    | v600 = v0
    | wf(lt,v600,v0,v1200) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_0:[bind(InfD,$fot(v0)),bind(SupD,$fot(v1200)),bind(V,$fot(v600))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
    less(v0,v600),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_7]) ).

cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
    ( ~ less(X,Y)
    | leq(X,Y) ),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_9]) ).

cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
    ( ~ less(v0,v600)
    | leq(v0,v600) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_3:[bind(X,$fot(v0)),bind(Y,$fot(v600))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
    leq(v0,v600),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( less(v0,v600) )],[refute_0_2,refute_0_4]) ).

cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
    less(v600,v1200),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_10]) ).

cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
    ( ~ less(v600,v1200)
    | leq(v600,v1200) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_3:[bind(X,$fot(v600)),bind(Y,$fot(v1200))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
    leq(v600,v1200),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( less(v600,v1200) )],[refute_0_6,refute_0_7]) ).

cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ leq(InfD,V)
    | ~ leq(V,SupD)
    | wf(eq,V,InfD,SupD) ),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_12]) ).

cnf(refute_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ leq(X_449,v600)
    | ~ leq(v600,v1200)
    | wf(eq,v600,X_449,v1200) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_9:[bind(InfD,$fot(X_449)),bind(SupD,$fot(v1200)),bind(V,$fot(v600))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ leq(X_449,v600)
    | wf(eq,v600,X_449,v1200) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( leq(v600,v1200) )],[refute_0_8,refute_0_10]) ).

cnf(refute_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ leq(v0,v600)
    | wf(eq,v600,v0,v1200) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_11:[bind(X_449,$fot(v0))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_13,plain,
    wf(eq,v600,v0,v1200),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( leq(v0,v600) )],[refute_0_5,refute_0_12]) ).

cnf(refute_0_14,plain,
    ( v600 = v0
    | wf(lt,v600,v0,v1200) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( wf(eq,v600,v0,v1200) )],[refute_0_13,refute_0_1]) ).

cnf(refute_0_15,plain,
    v0 != v600,
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_14]) ).

cnf(refute_0_16,plain,
    X0 = X0,
    introduced(tautology,[refl,[$fot(X0)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_17,plain,
    ( X0 != X0
    | X0 != Y0
    | Y0 = X0 ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(X0,X0) ),[0],$fot(Y0)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_18,plain,
    ( X0 != Y0
    | Y0 = X0 ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(X0,X0) )],[refute_0_16,refute_0_17]) ).

cnf(refute_0_19,plain,
    ( v600 != v0
    | v0 = v600 ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_18:[bind(X0,$fot(v600)),bind(Y0,$fot(v0))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_20,plain,
    v600 != v0,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(v0,v600) )],[refute_0_19,refute_0_15]) ).

cnf(refute_0_21,plain,
    wf(lt,v600,v0,v1200),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(v600,v0) )],[refute_0_14,refute_0_20]) ).

cnf(refute_0_22,plain,
    ~ wf(lt,v600,v0,v1200),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_15]) ).

cnf(refute_0_23,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( wf(lt,v600,v0,v1200) )],[refute_0_21,refute_0_22]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : MGT090+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.11/0.36  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 14:27:22 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.45/0.75  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.45/0.75  
% 0.45/0.75  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.45/0.75  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------