↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : MGT091+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:20:01 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 9.15s 9.48s
% Output   : Refutation 9.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MGT091+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 14:25:32 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 9.15/9.48  
% 9.15/9.48  SPASS V 3.9 
% 9.15/9.48  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 9.15/9.48  % SZS status Theorem
% 9.15/9.48  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 9.15/9.48  SPASS derived 8863 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 3605 clauses.
% 9.15/9.48  SPASS allocated 103739 KBytes.
% 9.15/9.48  SPASS spent	0:00:09.00 on the problem.
% 9.15/9.48  		0:00:00.06 for the input.
% 9.15/9.48  		0:00:00.06 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 9.15/9.48  		0:00:00.22 for inferences.
% 9.15/9.48  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 9.15/9.48  		0:00:08.57 for the reduction.
% 9.15/9.48  
% 9.15/9.48  
% 9.15/9.48  Here is a proof with depth 8, length 50 :
% 9.15/9.48  % SZS output start Refutation
% 9.15/9.48  8[0:Inp] ||  -> less(v0,v400)*r.
% 9.15/9.48  10[0:Inp] ||  -> less(v400,v600)*r.
% 9.15/9.48  11[0:Inp] ||  -> less(v400,v800)*r.
% 9.15/9.48  25[0:Inp] || less(u,v)* -> leq(u,v).
% 9.15/9.48  35[0:Inp] || in_closed(u,v,v)* -> equal(u,v).
% 9.15/9.48  36[0:Inp] || equal(u,v) -> in_closed(u,v,v)*.
% 9.15/9.48  37[0:Inp] || in_closed(u,v,w)* -> leq(v,u).
% 9.15/9.48  38[0:Inp] || in_closed(u,v,w)* -> leq(u,w).
% 9.15/9.48  46[0:Inp] || box2_compatible(v0,v600,v0,v600,v400,v800,v400,v800)* -> .
% 9.15/9.48  50[0:Inp] || less(u,v)*+ leq(w,u)* -> less(w,v)*.
% 9.15/9.48  53[0:Inp] || leq(u,v) leq(v,w) -> in_closed(v,u,w)*.
% 9.15/9.48  64[0:Inp] ||  -> in_closed(skf3(u,v,w,x),x,w)* axis_conflict(x,w,v,u).
% 9.15/9.48  65[0:Inp] ||  -> in_closed(skf3(u,v,w,x),v,u)* axis_conflict(y,z,v,u)*.
% 9.15/9.48  66[0:Inp] ||  -> in_closed(skf5(u,v,w,x),x,w)* axis_subsumes(x,w,v,u).
% 9.15/9.48  69[0:Inp] || in_closed(skf5(u,v,w,x),v,u)*+ -> axis_subsumes(y,z,v,u)*.
% 9.15/9.48  70[0:Inp] || in_closed(u,v,w)*+ in_closed(u,x,y)* -> axis_compatible(x,y,v,w)*.
% 9.15/9.48  71[0:Inp] || in_closed(u,v,w)* axis_subsumes(v,w,x,y)*+ -> in_closed(u,x,y)*.
% 9.15/9.48  81[0:Inp] || in_closed(u,v,w)* in_closed(u,x,y)* axis_conflict(x,y,v,w)*+ -> .
% 9.15/9.48  84[0:Inp] || axis_compatible(u,v,w,x) axis_compatible(y,z,x1,x2) -> box2_compatible(u,v,y,z,w,x,x1,x2)*.
% 9.15/9.48  90[0:Res:84.2,46.0] || axis_compatible(v0,v600,v400,v800)* axis_compatible(v0,v600,v400,v800)* -> .
% 9.15/9.48  91[0:Obv:90.0] || axis_compatible(v0,v600,v400,v800)* -> .
% 9.15/9.48  110[0:Res:66.0,35.0] ||  -> axis_subsumes(u,u,v,w) equal(skf5(w,v,u,u),u)**.
% 9.15/9.48  111[0:Res:66.0,37.0] ||  -> axis_subsumes(u,v,w,x) leq(u,skf5(x,w,v,u))*r.
% 9.15/9.48  112[0:Res:66.0,38.0] ||  -> axis_subsumes(u,v,w,x) leq(skf5(x,w,v,u),v)*l.
% 9.15/9.48  113[0:SpR:110.1,66.0] ||  -> axis_subsumes(u,u,v,w)* in_closed(u,u,u)* axis_subsumes(u,u,v,w)*.
% 9.15/9.48  115[0:Obv:113.0] ||  -> in_closed(u,u,u)* axis_subsumes(u,u,v,w)*.
% 9.15/9.48  165[0:Res:64.0,70.0] || in_closed(skf3(u,v,w,x),y,z)* -> axis_conflict(x,w,v,u) axis_compatible(y,z,x,w).
% 9.15/9.48  170[0:Res:115.1,71.1] || in_closed(u,v,v)*+ -> in_closed(v,v,v)* in_closed(u,w,x)*.
% 9.15/9.48  186[0:Res:36.1,170.0] || equal(u,v)*+ -> in_closed(v,v,v)* in_closed(u,w,x)*.
% 9.15/9.48  197[0:EqR:186.0] ||  -> in_closed(u,u,u)* in_closed(u,v,w)*.
% 9.15/9.48  198[0:Con:197.1] ||  -> in_closed(u,u,u)*.
% 9.15/9.48  289[0:Res:10.0,25.0] ||  -> leq(v400,v600)*r.
% 9.15/9.48  291[0:Res:8.0,25.0] ||  -> leq(v0,v400)*r.
% 9.15/9.48  820[0:Res:53.2,69.0] || leq(u,skf5(v,u,w,x))+ leq(skf5(v,u,w,x),v)*l -> axis_subsumes(y,z,u,v)*.
% 9.15/9.48  920[0:Res:11.0,50.0] || leq(u,v400)*+ -> less(u,v800)*.
% 9.15/9.48  959[0:Res:112.1,920.0] ||  -> axis_subsumes(u,v400,v,w) less(skf5(w,v,v400,u),v800)*l.
% 9.15/9.48  1047[0:Res:959.1,25.0] ||  -> axis_subsumes(u,v400,v,w) leq(skf5(w,v,v400,u),v800)*l.
% 9.15/9.48  3072[0:Res:65.0,165.0] ||  -> axis_conflict(u,v,w,x)* axis_conflict(y,z,w,x) axis_compatible(w,x,y,z)*.
% 9.15/9.48  3077[0:Con:3072.0] ||  -> axis_conflict(u,v,w,x) axis_compatible(w,x,u,v)*.
% 9.15/9.48  3158[0:Res:3077.1,91.0] ||  -> axis_conflict(v400,v800,v0,v600)*.
% 9.15/9.48  3167[0:Res:3158.0,81.2] || in_closed(u,v0,v600) in_closed(u,v400,v800)* -> .
% 9.15/9.48  6467[0:Res:111.1,820.0] || leq(skf5(u,v,w,v),u)*l -> axis_subsumes(v,w,v,u) axis_subsumes(x,y,v,u)*.
% 9.15/9.48  6473[0:Con:6467.2] || leq(skf5(u,v,w,v),u)*l -> axis_subsumes(v,w,v,u).
% 9.15/9.48  8281[0:Res:1047.1,6473.0] ||  -> axis_subsumes(u,v400,u,v800)* axis_subsumes(u,v400,u,v800)*.
% 9.15/9.48  8312[0:Obv:8281.0] ||  -> axis_subsumes(u,v400,u,v800)*.
% 9.15/9.48  8328[0:Res:8312.0,71.1] || in_closed(u,v,v400) -> in_closed(u,v,v800)*.
% 9.15/9.48  8460[0:Res:8328.1,3167.1] || in_closed(u,v400,v400)* in_closed(u,v0,v600) -> .
% 9.15/9.48  9715[0:Res:198.0,8460.0] || in_closed(v400,v0,v600)* -> .
% 9.15/9.48  9732[0:Res:53.2,9715.0] || leq(v0,v400) leq(v400,v600)*r -> .
% 9.15/9.48  9733[0:MRR:9732.0,9732.1,291.0,289.0] ||  -> .
% 9.15/9.48  % SZS output end Refutation
% 9.15/9.48  Formulae used in the proof : ord_v0_v400 ord_v400_v600 ord_v400_v800 less_implies_leq shape_point shape_closed odrl624 leq_less_trans in_closed axis_conflict_def axis_subsumes_def axis_compatible_def box2_overlap
% 9.15/9.48  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------