↑ Up

Beagle---0.9.52.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.52
% Problem  : MGT092+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:03:06 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 7.85s 3.49s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (  13 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   41 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   34 (  15   ~;  12   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   14 (  13 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   7 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (  21   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ completion_conflict > axis_subsumes > axis_conflict > axis_compatible > in_ropen > in_open > in_lopen > in_closed > completion_compatible > less > leq > val > is_verdict > box_verdict > #nlpp > v800 > v400 > v1200 > v0 > unknown > conflict > compatible > #skF_2 > #skF_3 > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(is_verdict,type,
    is_verdict: $i > $o ).

tff(axis_conflict,type,
    axis_conflict: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(v0,type,
    v0: $i ).

tff(in_lopen,type,
    in_lopen: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(box_verdict,type,
    box_verdict: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(unknown,type,
    unknown: $i ).

tff(in_ropen,type,
    in_ropen: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(completion_compatible,type,
    completion_compatible: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(in_open,type,
    in_open: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(completion_conflict,type,
    completion_conflict: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(val,type,
    val: $i > $o ).

tff(compatible,type,
    compatible: $i ).

tff(less,type,
    less: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_2',type,
    '#skF_2': ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(v400,type,
    v400: $i ).

tff(in_closed,type,
    in_closed: ( $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(axis_subsumes,type,
    axis_subsumes: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(leq,type,
    leq: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_3',type,
    '#skF_3': ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(axis_compatible,type,
    axis_compatible: ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': ( $i * $i * $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(v800,type,
    v800: $i ).

tff(v1200,type,
    v1200: $i ).

tff(conflict,type,
    conflict: $i ).

tff(f_373,axiom,
    less(v0,v400),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ord_v0_v400) ).

tff(f_93,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( less(X,Y)
     => leq(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax',less_implies_leq) ).

tff(f_374,axiom,
    less(v400,v800),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ord_v400_v800) ).

tff(f_375,axiom,
    less(v800,v1200),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ord_v800_v1200) ).

tff(f_65,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( ( less(X,Y)
        & less(Y,Z) )
     => less(X,Z) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax',transitive) ).

tff(f_191,axiom,
    ! [U,V,InfD,SupD] :
      ( ( leq(InfD,U)
        & leq(U,SupD)
        & less(U,V)
        & leq(V,SupD) )
     => completion_conflict(U,V,InfD,SupD) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+4.ax',sharpness_conflict) ).

tff(f_394,negated_conjecture,
    ~ completion_conflict(v400,v800,v0,v1200),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',odrl633) ).

tff(c_112,plain,
    less(v0,v400),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_373]) ).

tff(c_149,plain,
    ! [X_93,Y_94] :
      ( leq(X_93,Y_94)
      | ~ less(X_93,Y_94) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_93]) ).

tff(c_160,plain,
    leq(v0,v400),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_112,c_149]) ).

tff(c_114,plain,
    less(v400,v800),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_374]) ).

tff(c_116,plain,
    less(v800,v1200),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_375]) ).

tff(c_418,plain,
    ! [X_136,Z_137,Y_138] :
      ( less(X_136,Z_137)
      | ~ less(Y_138,Z_137)
      | ~ less(X_136,Y_138) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_65]) ).

tff(c_584,plain,
    ! [X_147] :
      ( less(X_147,v1200)
      | ~ less(X_147,v800) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_116,c_418]) ).

tff(c_615,plain,
    less(v400,v1200),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_114,c_584]) ).

tff(c_16,plain,
    ! [X_11,Y_12] :
      ( leq(X_11,Y_12)
      | ~ less(X_11,Y_12) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_93]) ).

tff(c_625,plain,
    leq(v400,v1200),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_615,c_16]) ).

tff(c_161,plain,
    leq(v800,v1200),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_116,c_149]) ).

tff(c_2010,plain,
    ! [U_246,V_247,InfD_248,SupD_249] :
      ( completion_conflict(U_246,V_247,InfD_248,SupD_249)
      | ~ leq(V_247,SupD_249)
      | ~ less(U_246,V_247)
      | ~ leq(U_246,SupD_249)
      | ~ leq(InfD_248,U_246) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_191]) ).

tff(c_130,plain,
    ~ completion_conflict(v400,v800,v0,v1200),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_394]) ).

tff(c_2013,plain,
    ( ~ leq(v800,v1200)
    | ~ less(v400,v800)
    | ~ leq(v400,v1200)
    | ~ leq(v0,v400) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2010,c_130]) ).

tff(c_2017,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_160,c_625,c_114,c_161,c_2013]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MGT092+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 14:25:28 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 7.85/3.49  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.85/3.50  
% 7.85/3.50  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------