↑ Up

Drodi-SAT---4.1.1.THM-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Drodi-SAT---4.1.1
% Problem  : MGT092+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : drodi -satmode(on) -timeout(300) /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:25:55 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.42s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : MGT092+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : drodi -satmode(on) -timeout(300) /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:21:43 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.37  % Drodi V4.1.1
% 0.13/0.42  % Refutation found
% 0.13/0.42  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark: Theorem is valid
% 0.13/0.42  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.42  fof(f4,axiom,(
% 0.13/0.42    (! [X,Y] :( leq(X,Y)<=> ( less(X,Y)| X = Y ) ) )),
% 0.13/0.42    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 0.13/0.42  fof(f8,axiom,(
% 0.13/0.42    (! [X,Y,Z] :( ( less(X,Y)& leq(Y,Z) )=> less(X,Z) ) )),
% 0.13/0.42    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 0.13/0.42  fof(f13,axiom,(
% 0.13/0.42    (! [U,V,InfD,SupD] :( ( leq(InfD,U)& leq(U,SupD)& less(U,V)& leq(V,SupD) )=> completion_conflict(U,V,InfD,SupD) ) )),
% 0.13/0.42    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 0.13/0.42  fof(f38,axiom,(
% 0.13/0.42    less(v0,v400) ),
% 0.13/0.42    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 0.13/0.42  fof(f39,axiom,(
% 0.13/0.42    less(v400,v800) ),
% 0.13/0.42    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 0.13/0.42  fof(f40,axiom,(
% 0.13/0.42    less(v800,v1200) ),
% 0.13/0.42    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 0.13/0.42  fof(f42,conjecture,(
% 0.13/0.42    completion_conflict(v400,v800,v0,v1200) ),
% 0.13/0.42    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p')).
% 0.13/0.42  fof(f43,negated_conjecture,(
% 0.13/0.42    ~(completion_conflict(v400,v800,v0,v1200) )),
% 0.13/0.42    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f42])).
% 0.13/0.42  fof(f49,plain,(
% 0.13/0.42    ![X,Y]: ((~leq(X,Y)|(less(X,Y)|X=Y))&(leq(X,Y)|(~less(X,Y)&~X=Y)))),
% 0.13/0.42    inference(NNF_transformation,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 0.13/0.42  fof(f50,plain,(
% 0.13/0.42    (![X,Y]: (~leq(X,Y)|(less(X,Y)|X=Y)))&(![X,Y]: (leq(X,Y)|(~less(X,Y)&~X=Y)))),
% 0.13/0.42    inference(miniscoping,[status(thm)],[f49])).
% 0.13/0.42  fof(f52,plain,(
% 0.13/0.42    ![X0,X1]: (leq(X0,X1)|~less(X0,X1))),
% 0.13/0.42    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f50])).
% 0.13/0.42  fof(f61,plain,(
% 0.13/0.42    ![X,Y,Z]: ((~less(X,Y)|~leq(Y,Z))|less(X,Z))),
% 0.13/0.42    inference(pre_NNF_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8])).
% 0.13/0.42  fof(f62,plain,(
% 0.13/0.42    ![X,Z]: ((![Y]: (~less(X,Y)|~leq(Y,Z)))|less(X,Z))),
% 0.13/0.42    inference(miniscoping,[status(thm)],[f61])).
% 0.13/0.42  fof(f63,plain,(
% 0.13/0.42    ![X0,X1,X2]: (~less(X0,X1)|~leq(X1,X2)|less(X0,X2))),
% 0.13/0.42    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f62])).
% 0.13/0.42  fof(f74,plain,(
% 0.13/0.42    ![U,V,InfD,SupD]: ((((~leq(InfD,U)|~leq(U,SupD))|~less(U,V))|~leq(V,SupD))|completion_conflict(U,V,InfD,SupD))),
% 0.13/0.42    inference(pre_NNF_transformation,[status(thm)],[f13])).
% 0.13/0.42  fof(f75,plain,(
% 0.13/0.42    ![X0,X1,X2,X3]: (~leq(X0,X1)|~leq(X1,X2)|~less(X1,X3)|~leq(X3,X2)|completion_conflict(X1,X3,X0,X2))),
% 0.13/0.42    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f74])).
% 0.13/0.42  fof(f143,plain,(
% 0.13/0.42    less(v0,v400)),
% 0.13/0.42    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f38])).
% 0.13/0.42  fof(f144,plain,(
% 0.13/0.42    less(v400,v800)),
% 0.13/0.42    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f39])).
% 0.13/0.42  fof(f145,plain,(
% 0.13/0.42    less(v800,v1200)),
% 0.13/0.42    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f40])).
% 0.13/0.42  fof(f152,plain,(
% 0.13/0.42    ~completion_conflict(v400,v800,v0,v1200)),
% 0.13/0.42    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f43])).
% 0.13/0.42  fof(f173,plain,(
% 0.13/0.42    ![X0,X1,X2,X3]: (~less(X0,X1)|~leq(X2,X0)|~less(X0,X3)|~leq(X3,X1)|completion_conflict(X0,X3,X2,X1))),
% 0.13/0.42    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f52,f75])).
% 0.13/0.42  fof(f174,plain,(
% 0.13/0.42    ![X0,X1,X2,X3]: (~leq(X0,X1)|~less(X1,X2)|~leq(X2,X3)|completion_conflict(X1,X2,X0,X3))),
% 0.13/0.42    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f173,f63])).
% 0.13/0.42  fof(f198,plain,(
% 0.13/0.42    ~leq(v0,v400)|~less(v400,v800)|~leq(v800,v1200)),
% 0.13/0.42    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f174,f152])).
% 0.13/0.42  fof(f199,plain,(
% 0.13/0.42    ~leq(v0,v400)|~leq(v800,v1200)),
% 0.13/0.42    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f198,f144])).
% 0.13/0.42  fof(f223,plain,(
% 0.13/0.42    ~leq(v0,v400)|~less(v800,v1200)),
% 0.13/0.42    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f199,f52])).
% 0.13/0.42  fof(f224,plain,(
% 0.13/0.42    ~leq(v0,v400)),
% 0.13/0.42    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f223,f145])).
% 0.13/0.42  fof(f226,plain,(
% 0.13/0.42    ~less(v0,v400)),
% 0.13/0.42    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[f224,f52])).
% 0.13/0.42  fof(f227,plain,(
% 0.13/0.42    $false),
% 0.13/0.42    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[f226,f143])).
% 0.13/0.42  % SZS output end CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.44  % Elapsed time: 0.063126 seconds
% 0.13/0.44  % CPU time: 0.238645 seconds
% 0.13/0.44  % Total memory used: 83.412 MB
% 0.13/0.44  % Net memory used: 83.113 MB
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------