↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : MGT092+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:00:54 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 7.13s 3.87s
% Output   : Refutation 7.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   27
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   56 (  20 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  164 (  19 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  446 (  16   ~;   7   |;  63   &; 322   @)
%                                         (   6 <=>;  32  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   7 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   16 (  14 usr;   5 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  107 (   0   ^; 104   !;   3   ?; 107   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(completion_conflict_decl,type,
    completion_conflict: $i > $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(v400_decl,type,
    v400: $i ).

thf(v800_decl,type,
    v800: $i ).

thf(v0_decl,type,
    v0: $i ).

thf(v1200_decl,type,
    v1200: $i ).

thf(axis_compatible_decl,type,
    axis_compatible: $i > $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(in_closed_decl,type,
    in_closed: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(less_decl,type,
    less: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(leq_decl,type,
    leq: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(completion_compatible_decl,type,
    completion_compatible: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(in_lopen_decl,type,
    in_lopen: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(in_ropen_decl,type,
    in_ropen: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(in_open_decl,type,
    in_open: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(val_decl,type,
    val: $i > $o ).

thf(21,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ less ) )
        & ( D @ ( B @ leq ) )
        & ( B @ ( C @ leq ) )
        & ( D @ ( A @ leq ) )
        & ( A @ ( C @ leq ) ) )
     => ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ completion_conflict ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',completion_conflict) ).

thf(101,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ less ) )
        & ( D @ ( B @ leq ) )
        & ( B @ ( C @ leq ) )
        & ( D @ ( A @ leq ) )
        & ( A @ ( C @ leq ) ) )
     => ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ completion_conflict ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[21]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ less ) )
     => ( B @ ( A @ leq ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',less_implies_leq) ).

thf(52,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ less ) )
     => ( B @ ( A @ leq ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    v1200 @ ( v0 @ ( v800 @ ( v400 @ completion_conflict ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',odrl633) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( v1200 @ ( v0 @ ( v800 @ ( v400 @ completion_conflict ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(29,plain,
    ~ ( v1200 @ ( v0 @ ( v800 @ ( v400 @ completion_conflict ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( C @ ( B @ less ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ leq ) ) )
     => ( C @ ( A @ less ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',leq_less_trans) ).

thf(45,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( C @ ( B @ less ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ leq ) ) )
     => ( C @ ( A @ less ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ in_lopen ) ) )
    <=> ( ( C @ ( A @ leq ) )
        & ( A @ ( B @ less ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',in_lopen) ).

thf(54,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( C @ ( A @ leq ) )
          & ( A @ ( B @ less ) ) )
       => ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ in_lopen ) ) ) )
      & ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ in_lopen ) ) )
       => ( ( C @ ( A @ leq ) )
          & ( A @ ( B @ less ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(15,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( C @ ( B @ less ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ less ) ) )
     => ( C @ ( A @ less ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transitive) ).

thf(80,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( C @ ( B @ less ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ less ) ) )
     => ( C @ ( A @ less ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(13,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ leq ) )
    <=> ( ( A = B )
        | ( B @ ( A @ less ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',leq_def) ).

thf(63,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( A = B )
          | ( B @ ( A @ less ) ) )
       => ( B @ ( A @ leq ) ) )
      & ( ( B @ ( A @ leq ) )
       => ( ( A = B )
          | ( B @ ( A @ less ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( C @ ( A @ leq ) )
        & ( A @ ( B @ leq ) ) )
     => ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ completion_compatible ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',completion_compat) ).

thf(50,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( C @ ( A @ leq ) )
        & ( A @ ( B @ leq ) ) )
     => ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ completion_compatible ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(23,axiom,
    v1200 @ val,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',val_v1200) ).

thf(104,plain,
    v1200 @ val,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[23]) ).

thf(16,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ in_open ) ) )
    <=> ( ( C @ ( A @ less ) )
        & ( A @ ( B @ less ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',in_open) ).

thf(82,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( C @ ( A @ less ) )
          & ( A @ ( B @ less ) ) )
       => ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ in_open ) ) ) )
      & ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ in_open ) ) )
       => ( ( C @ ( A @ less ) )
          & ( A @ ( B @ less ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
      ( ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ axis_compatible ) ) ) )
    <=> ? [E: $i] :
          ( ( D @ ( C @ ( E @ in_closed ) ) )
          & ( B @ ( A @ ( E @ in_closed ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axis_compatible_def) ).

thf(30,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
      ( ( ? [E: $i] :
            ( ( D @ ( C @ ( E @ in_closed ) ) )
            & ( B @ ( A @ ( E @ in_closed ) ) ) )
       => ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ axis_compatible ) ) ) ) )
      & ( ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ axis_compatible ) ) ) )
       => ? [E: $i] :
            ( ( D @ ( C @ ( E @ in_closed ) ) )
            & ( B @ ( A @ ( E @ in_closed ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(26,axiom,
    ( ( v800 != v1200 )
    & ( v400 != v1200 )
    & ( v400 != v800 )
    & ( v0 != v1200 )
    & ( v0 != v800 )
    & ( v0 != v400 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',distinct) ).

thf(107,plain,
    ( ( v800 != v1200 )
    & ( v400 != v1200 )
    & ( v400 != v800 )
    & ( v0 != v1200 )
    & ( v0 != v800 )
    & ( v0 != v400 ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[26]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( B @ less ) )
      | ( A = B )
      | ( B @ ( A @ less ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',trichotomy) ).

thf(47,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( B @ less ) )
      | ( A = B )
      | ( B @ ( A @ less ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( B @ leq ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ leq ) ) )
     => ( A = B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',leq_antisym) ).

thf(42,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( B @ leq ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ leq ) ) )
     => ( A = B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( C @ ( B @ leq ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ less ) ) )
     => ( C @ ( A @ less ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',less_leq_trans) ).

thf(37,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( C @ ( B @ leq ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ less ) ) )
     => ( C @ ( A @ less ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(25,axiom,
    v800 @ ( v400 @ less ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ord_v400_v800) ).

thf(106,plain,
    v800 @ ( v400 @ less ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[25]) ).

thf(27,axiom,
    v400 @ ( v0 @ less ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ord_v0_v400) ).

thf(121,plain,
    v400 @ ( v0 @ less ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[27]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
      ( ( ( D @ ( B @ leq ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ less ) )
        & ( D @ ( A @ leq ) )
        & ( A @ ( C @ leq ) ) )
     => ( D @ ( C @ ( A @ completion_compatible ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sharpness_compat) ).

thf(61,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
      ( ( ( D @ ( B @ leq ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ less ) )
        & ( D @ ( A @ leq ) )
        & ( A @ ( C @ leq ) ) )
     => ( D @ ( C @ ( A @ completion_compatible ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(17,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( C @ ( B @ leq ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ leq ) ) )
     => ( C @ ( A @ leq ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',leq_trans) ).

thf(89,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( C @ ( B @ leq ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ leq ) ) )
     => ( C @ ( A @ leq ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

thf(14,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ in_ropen ) ) )
    <=> ( ( C @ ( A @ less ) )
        & ( A @ ( B @ leq ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',in_ropen) ).

thf(73,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( C @ ( A @ less ) )
          & ( A @ ( B @ leq ) ) )
       => ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ in_ropen ) ) ) )
      & ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ in_ropen ) ) )
       => ( ( C @ ( A @ less ) )
          & ( A @ ( B @ leq ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(24,axiom,
    v1200 @ ( v800 @ less ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ord_v800_v1200) ).

thf(105,plain,
    v1200 @ ( v800 @ less ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[24]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( A @ ( A @ less ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',irreflexive) ).

thf(39,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( A @ ( A @ less ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(19,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
      ( ( ( D @ ( B @ leq ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ less ) )
        & ( D @ ( A @ leq ) )
        & ( A @ ( C @ leq ) ) )
     => ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ completion_conflict ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sharpness_conflict) ).

thf(98,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
      ( ( ( D @ ( B @ leq ) )
        & ( B @ ( A @ less ) )
        & ( D @ ( A @ leq ) )
        & ( A @ ( C @ leq ) ) )
     => ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ completion_conflict ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

thf(22,axiom,
    v800 @ val,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',val_v800) ).

thf(103,plain,
    v800 @ val,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[22]) ).

thf(18,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ in_closed ) ) )
    <=> ( ( C @ ( A @ leq ) )
        & ( A @ ( B @ leq ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',in_closed) ).

thf(91,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
      ( ( ( ( C @ ( A @ leq ) )
          & ( A @ ( B @ leq ) ) )
       => ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ in_closed ) ) ) )
      & ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ in_closed ) ) )
       => ( ( C @ ( A @ leq ) )
          & ( A @ ( B @ leq ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

thf(28,axiom,
    v0 @ val,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',val_v0) ).

thf(122,plain,
    v0 @ val,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[28]) ).

thf(20,axiom,
    v400 @ val,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',val_v400) ).

thf(100,plain,
    v400 @ val,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[20]) ).

thf(123,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[101,52,29,45,54,80,63,50,104,82,30,107,47,42,37,106,121,61,89,73,105,39,98,103,91,122,100]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : MGT092+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.24/0.50  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.24/0.50  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.24/0.50  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.24/0.50  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.24/0.50  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.24/0.50  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.24/0.50  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.24/0.50  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 00:14:37 UTC 2026
% 0.24/0.50  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.24/0.50  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.43/1.33  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.98/1.69  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (354ms). 
% 2.35/1.71  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 3.48/2.31  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 3.48/2.32  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 3.69/2.45  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 41 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 3.86/2.55  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 26 axioms (removed 15 axioms). 
% 4.08/2.64  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 4.08/2.66  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 4.08/2.66  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 7.13/3.87  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 7.13/3.87  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 7.13/3.87  % Time passed: 3158ms (effective reasoning time: 2147ms)
% 7.13/3.87  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 7.13/3.87  % Axioms used in derivation (26): ord_v0_v400, val_v1200, leq_antisym, ord_v400_v800, val_v0, irreflexive, transitive, ord_v800_v1200, less_implies_leq, in_ropen, completion_compat, sharpness_compat, leq_trans, leq_less_trans, val_v400, in_closed, in_lopen, distinct, less_leq_trans, completion_conflict, axis_compatible_def, trichotomy, in_open, sharpness_conflict, val_v800, leq_def
% 7.13/3.87  % No. of inferences in proof: 56
% 7.13/3.87  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 3158 ms resp. 2147 ms w/o parsing
% 7.47/3.94  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 7.47/3.94  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------