↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : MGT092+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:03:06 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.02s 0.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.02s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   35 (  20 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   67 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   61 (  29   ~;  20   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   29 (   0 sgn  12   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(irreflexive,axiom,
    ! [X] : ~ less(X,X),
    file('theBenchmark.p',irreflexive) ).

fof(transitive,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( ( less(Y,Z)
        & less(X,Y) )
     => less(X,Z) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',transitive) ).

fof(trichotomy,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( less(Y,X)
      | X = Y
      | less(X,Y) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',trichotomy) ).

fof(less_implies_leq,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( less(X,Y)
     => leq(X,Y) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',less_implies_leq) ).

fof(sharpness_conflict,axiom,
    ! [U,V,InfD,SupD] :
      ( ( leq(V,SupD)
        & less(U,V)
        & leq(U,SupD)
        & leq(InfD,U) )
     => completion_conflict(U,V,InfD,SupD) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',sharpness_conflict) ).

fof(distinct,axiom,
    ( v800 != v1200
    & v400 != v1200
    & v400 != v800
    & v0 != v1200
    & v0 != v800
    & v0 != v400 ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',distinct) ).

fof(odrl633,conjecture,
    completion_conflict(v400,v800,v0,v1200),
    file('theBenchmark.p',odrl633) ).

fof(odrl633_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ completion_conflict(v400,v800,v0,v1200),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[odrl633]) ).

cnf(c_47,negated_conjecture,
    ~ completion_conflict(v400,v800,v0,v1200),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[odrl633_neg]) ).

cnf(c_49,plain,
    v1200 != v400,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[distinct]) ).

fof(ord_v800_v1200,axiom,
    less(v800,v1200),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ord_v800_v1200) ).

cnf(c_56,plain,
    less(v800,v1200),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ord_v800_v1200]) ).

fof(ord_v400_v800,axiom,
    less(v400,v800),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ord_v400_v800) ).

cnf(c_57,plain,
    less(v400,v800),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ord_v400_v800]) ).

fof(ord_v0_v400,axiom,
    less(v0,v400),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ord_v0_v400) ).

cnf(c_58,plain,
    less(v0,v400),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ord_v0_v400]) ).

cnf(c_85,plain,
    ( completion_conflict(B,D,A,C)
    | ~ leq(D,C)
    | ~ less(B,D)
    | ~ leq(B,C)
    | ~ leq(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[sharpness_conflict]) ).

cnf(c_89,plain,
    ( leq(A,B)
    | ~ less(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[less_implies_leq]) ).

cnf(c_93,plain,
    ( less(B,A)
    | B = A
    | less(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[trichotomy]) ).

cnf(c_94,plain,
    ( less(A,C)
    | ~ less(B,C)
    | ~ less(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[transitive]) ).

cnf(c_95,plain,
    ~ less(A,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[irreflexive]) ).

cnf(c_145,plain,
    leq(v0,v400),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_89,c_58]) ).

cnf(c_147,plain,
    leq(v800,v1200),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_89,c_56]) ).

cnf(c_254,plain,
    ( less(A,v800)
    | ~ less(A,v400) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_94,c_57]) ).

cnf(c_179,plain,
    ~ less(v800,v400),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_254,c_95]) ).

cnf(c_255,plain,
    ( less(v800,A)
    | ~ less(v1200,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_94,c_56]) ).

cnf(c_198,plain,
    ~ less(v1200,v400),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_255,c_179]) ).

cnf(c_256,plain,
    ( completion_conflict(v400,B,v0,A)
    | ~ leq(B,A)
    | ~ less(v400,B)
    | ~ leq(v400,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_85,c_145]) ).

cnf(c_257,plain,
    ( completion_conflict(v400,v800,v0,A)
    | ~ leq(v800,A)
    | ~ leq(v400,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_256,c_57]) ).

cnf(c_258,plain,
    ( completion_conflict(v400,v800,v0,v1200)
    | ~ leq(v400,v1200) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_257,c_147]) ).

cnf(c_223,negated_conjecture,
    ~ leq(v400,v1200),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_258,c_47]) ).

cnf(c_259,plain,
    ( v1200 = v400
    | less(v400,v1200) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_198,c_93]) ).

cnf(c_242,plain,
    less(v400,v1200),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_259]) ).

cnf(c_260,plain,
    leq(v400,v1200),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_242,c_89]) ).

cnf(c_253,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_223,c_260]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MGT092+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.02/0.37  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.02/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.02/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.02/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.02/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.02/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.02/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.02/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 00:13:19 UTC 2026
% 0.02/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.02/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.02/0.37  % Process 4163509 was started by sandbox2 on n020,
% 0.02/0.37  % Sat Sep 26 00:13:19 2026
% 0.02/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.02/0.38  
% 0.02/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.02/0.41  
% 0.02/0.41  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.02/0.41  
% 0.02/0.41  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.02/0.41  % Length of proof is 24.
% 0.02/0.41  % Level of proof is 5.
% 0.02/0.41  % Maximum clause weight is 22.000.
% 0.02/0.41  % Given clauses 74.
% 0.02/0.41  
% 0.02/0.41  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------