↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : MGT092+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:13:04 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.92s 6.30s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.92s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   44 (  18 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  122 (   4 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  153 (  75   ~;  66   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   79 (   0 sgn  79   !;   0   ?;  29   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( less(X0,X1)
     => leq(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax',less_implies_leq) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( leq(X1,X2)
        & leq(X0,X1) )
     => leq(X0,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax',leq_trans) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( less(X0,X1)
        & leq(X1,X3)
        & leq(X2,X1)
        & leq(X0,X3)
        & leq(X2,X0) )
     => completion_conflict(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+4.ax',completion_conflict) ).

fof(f13,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( leq(X1,X3)
        & less(X0,X1)
        & leq(X0,X3)
        & leq(X2,X0) )
     => completion_conflict(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+4.ax',sharpness_conflict) ).

fof(f38,axiom,
    less(v0,v400),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ord_v0_v400) ).

fof(f39,axiom,
    less(v400,v800),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ord_v400_v800) ).

fof(f40,axiom,
    less(v800,v1200),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ord_v800_v1200) ).

fof(f42,conjecture,
    completion_conflict(v400,v800,v0,v1200),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',odrl633) ).

fof(f43,negated_conjecture,
    ~ completion_conflict(v400,v800,v0,v1200),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f42]) ).

fof(f44,plain,
    ~ completion_conflict(v400,v800,v0,v1200),
    inference(flattening,[],[f43]) ).

fof(f56,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ less(X0,X1)
      | leq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f61,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ leq(X1,X2)
      | ~ leq(X0,X1)
      | leq(X0,X2) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f62,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ leq(X1,X2)
      | ~ leq(X0,X1)
      | leq(X0,X2) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f61]) ).

fof(f63,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ less(X0,X1)
      | ~ leq(X1,X3)
      | ~ leq(X2,X1)
      | ~ leq(X0,X3)
      | ~ leq(X2,X0)
      | completion_conflict(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f64,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ less(X0,X1)
      | ~ leq(X1,X3)
      | ~ leq(X2,X1)
      | ~ leq(X0,X3)
      | ~ leq(X2,X0)
      | completion_conflict(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f63]) ).

fof(f65,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ leq(X1,X3)
      | ~ less(X0,X1)
      | ~ leq(X0,X3)
      | ~ leq(X2,X0)
      | completion_conflict(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f66,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ leq(X1,X3)
      | ~ less(X0,X1)
      | ~ leq(X0,X3)
      | ~ leq(X2,X0)
      | completion_conflict(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f65]) ).

fof(f97,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ less(X0,X1)
      | leq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f56]) ).

fof(f100,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ leq(X1,X2)
      | ~ leq(X0,X1)
      | leq(X0,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f62]) ).

fof(f101,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ less(X0,X1)
      | ~ leq(X1,X3)
      | ~ leq(X2,X1)
      | ~ leq(X0,X3)
      | ~ leq(X2,X0)
      | completion_conflict(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f64]) ).

fof(f102,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ leq(X1,X3)
      | ~ less(X0,X1)
      | ~ leq(X0,X3)
      | ~ leq(X2,X0)
      | completion_conflict(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f66]) ).

fof(f126,plain,
    less(v0,v400),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f38]) ).

fof(f127,plain,
    less(v400,v800),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).

fof(f128,plain,
    less(v800,v1200),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f40]) ).

fof(f135,plain,
    ~ completion_conflict(v400,v800,v0,v1200),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f44]) ).

tcf(c_56,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( leq(X0,X1)
      | ~ less(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f97]) ).

tcf(c_59,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( leq(X0,X2)
      | ~ leq(X1,X2)
      | ~ leq(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f100]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( completion_conflict(X0,X1,X3,X2)
      | ~ leq(X3,X1)
      | ~ leq(X3,X0)
      | ~ leq(X1,X2)
      | ~ leq(X0,X2)
      | ~ less(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f101]) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( completion_conflict(X0,X1,X3,X2)
      | ~ leq(X3,X0)
      | ~ leq(X1,X2)
      | ~ leq(X0,X2)
      | ~ less(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f102]) ).

tcf(c_85,plain,
    less(v0,v400),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f126]) ).

tcf(c_86,plain,
    less(v400,v800),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f127]) ).

tcf(c_87,plain,
    less(v800,v1200),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f128]) ).

tcf(c_94,negated_conjecture,
    ~ completion_conflict(v400,v800,v0,v1200),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f135]) ).

tcf(c_120,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( completion_conflict(X0,X1,X3,X2)
      | ~ leq(X3,X0)
      | ~ leq(X1,X2)
      | ~ less(X0,X1) ),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_56,c_59,c_61]) ).

tcf(c_122,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( completion_conflict(X0,X1,X3,X2)
      | ~ less(X0,X1)
      | ~ leq(X1,X2)
      | ~ leq(X3,X0) ),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_120]) ).

tcf(c_123,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( completion_conflict(X0,X1,X3,X2)
      | ~ leq(X3,X0)
      | ~ leq(X1,X2)
      | ~ less(X0,X1) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_122]) ).

tcf(c_448,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ~ leq(X3,X0)
      | ~ leq(X1,X2)
      | ~ less(X0,X1)
      | ( X3 != v0 )
      | ( X2 != v1200 )
      | ( X1 != v800 )
      | ( X0 != v400 ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_123,c_94]) ).

tcf(c_449,plain,
    ( ~ leq(v800,v1200)
    | ~ leq(v0,v400)
    | ~ less(v400,v800) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_448]) ).

tcf(c_450,plain,
    ( ~ leq(v800,v1200)
    | ~ leq(v0,v400) ),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_449,c_86,c_449]) ).

tcf(c_886,plain,
    ( ~ leq(v800,v1200)
    | ~ leq(v0,v400) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_450]) ).

tcf(c_1334,plain,
    leq(v0,v400),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_85,c_56]) ).

tcf(c_1336,plain,
    leq(v800,v1200),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_87,c_56]) ).

tcf(c_1337,plain,
    ~ leq(v800,v1200),
    inference(backward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_886,c_1334]) ).

tcf(c_1338,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1337,c_1336]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MGT092+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/5.38  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/5.38  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:22:56 UTC 2026
% 0.10/5.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/5.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.15/5.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/5.44  
% 0.15/5.44  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.15/5.44  
% 0.15/5.44  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.15/5.45  % Proving...
% 0.92/6.30  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.92/6.30  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.92/6.30  
% 0.92/6.30  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 0.92/6.30  
% 0.92/6.30  % ------  iProver source info
% 0.92/6.30  
% 0.92/6.30  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 0.92/6.30  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 0.92/6.30  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.92/6.30  
% 0.92/6.30  % ------ Parsing...
% 0.92/6.30  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 0.92/6.30  
% 0.92/6.30  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 2 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 0.92/6.30  
% 0.92/6.30  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 0.92/6.30  
% 0.92/6.30  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 0.92/6.30  % ------ Proving...
% 0.92/6.30  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 0.92/6.30  
% 0.92/6.30  % 
% 0.92/6.30  % clauses                               43
% 0.92/6.30  % conjectures                           0
% 0.92/6.30  % EPR                                   33
% 0.92/6.30  % Horn                                  34
% 0.92/6.30  % unary                                 18
% 0.92/6.30  % binary                                10
% 0.92/6.30  % lits                                  86
% 0.92/6.30  % lits eq                               25
% 0.92/6.30  % fd_pure                               0
% 0.92/6.30  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 0.92/6.30  % fd_cond                               3
% 0.92/6.30  % fd_pseudo_cond                        3
% 0.92/6.30  % AC symbols                            0
% 0.92/6.30  
% 0.92/6.30  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 0.92/6.30  
% 0.92/6.30  % ------ no conjectures: strip conj schedule 
% 0.92/6.30  
% 0.92/6.30  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" stripped conjectures Time Limit: 10.
% 0.92/6.30  
% 0.92/6.30  
% 0.92/6.30  % ------ 
% 0.92/6.30  % Current options:
% 0.92/6.30  % ------ 
% 0.92/6.30  
% 0.92/6.30  
% 0.92/6.30  % 
% 0.92/6.30  
% 0.92/6.30  % ------ Proving...
% 0.92/6.30  % 
% 0.92/6.30  
% 0.92/6.30  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.92/6.30  
% 0.92/6.30  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.92/6.30  
% 0.92/6.30  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------