%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : MGT094+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:27:02 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 10 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 18 ( 9 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 14 ( 10 ~; 2 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-4 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-6 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 sgn 12 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(odrl653,conjecture,
subs_verdict(v0,v800,present,v0,v600,present) = conflict,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',odrl653) ).
fof(no_subs_hint,axiom,
~ axis_subsumes(v0,v800,v0,v600),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',no_subs_hint) ).
fof(subs_present_no,axiom,
! [X14,X15,X16,X17] :
( ~ axis_subsumes(X14,X15,X16,X17)
=> subs_verdict(X14,X15,present,X16,X17,present) = conflict ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+7.ax',subs_present_no) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
subs_verdict(v0,v800,present,v0,v600,present) != conflict,
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[odrl653]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
~ axis_subsumes(v0,v800,v0,v600),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[no_subs_hint]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X14,X15,X16,X17] :
( ~ axis_subsumes(X14,X15,X16,X17)
=> subs_verdict(X14,X15,present,X16,X17,present) = conflict ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subs_present_no]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
subs_verdict(v0,v800,present,v0,v600,present) != conflict,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
~ axis_subsumes(v0,v800,v0,v600),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X109,X110,X111,X112] :
( subs_verdict(X109,X110,present,X111,X112,present) = conflict
| axis_subsumes(X109,X110,X111,X112) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
subs_verdict(v0,v800,present,v0,v600,present) != conflict,
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
~ axis_subsumes(v0,v800,v0,v600),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( subs_verdict(X1,X2,present,X3,X4,present) = conflict
| axis_subsumes(X1,X2,X3,X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
subs_verdict(v0,v800,present,v0,v600,present) != conflict,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : MGT094+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.36 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:28:28 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.48 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.48 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.48 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.48 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 676825 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.48 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.13/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.48 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.48 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.48 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.48 % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.48 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.48 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.48 % Starting U----_206c_10_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.48 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.48 % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with pid 676835 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.48 % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y
% 0.13/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.48 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.48 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.48 % Search class: FGHSS-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.48 % partial match(1): FGHSF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.48 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.48 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.48 % Starting U----_206c_10_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.48 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.48 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.48
% 0.13/0.48 % Proof found!
% 0.13/0.48 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.48 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.48 % Parsed axioms : 80
% 0.13/0.48 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.13/0.48 % Initial clauses : 127
% 0.13/0.48 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.13/0.48 % Initial clauses in saturation : 127
% 0.13/0.48 % Processed clauses : 105
% 0.13/0.48 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.13/0.48 % ...subsumed : 1
% 0.13/0.48 % ...remaining for further processing : 104
% 0.13/0.48 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.13/0.48 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.13/0.48 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.48 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.13/0.48 % Generated clauses : 18
% 0.13/0.48 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.13/0.48 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.48 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.13/0.48 % Paramodulations : 15
% 0.13/0.48 % Factorizations : 2
% 0.13/0.48 % NegExts : 0
% 0.13/0.48 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.13/0.48 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.13/0.48 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.13/0.48 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.13/0.48 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.13/0.48 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.13/0.48 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.48 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.48 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.48 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.13/0.48 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.48 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.48 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.48 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.48 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.48 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.48 % Current number of processed clauses : 103
% 0.13/0.48 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 42
% 0.13/0.48 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.48 % Negative unit clauses : 35
% 0.13/0.48 % Non-unit-clauses : 26
% 0.13/0.48 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 26
% 0.13/0.48 % ...number of literals in the above : 86
% 0.13/0.48 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.13/0.48 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.48 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 55
% 0.13/0.48 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 48
% 0.13/0.48 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.13/0.48 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 318
% 0.13/0.48 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.13/0.48 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.13/0.48 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.13/0.48 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.13/0.48 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.13/0.48 % Termbank termtop insertions : 5770
% 0.13/0.48 % Search garbage collected termcells : 1054
% 0.13/0.48
% 0.13/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.48 % User time : 0.015 s
% 0.13/0.48 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.13/0.48 % Total time : 0.020 s
% 0.13/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 3960 pages
% 0.13/0.48
% 0.13/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.48 % User time : 0.046 s
% 0.13/0.48 % System time : 0.015 s
% 0.13/0.48 % Total time : 0.060 s
% 0.13/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.13/0.48 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------