↑ Up

Metis---2.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Metis---2.4
% Problem  : MGT094+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:16:17 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 4.37s 4.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 4.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   19 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   29 (  17 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   21 (  11   ~;   9   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-6 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   0 sgn  12   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(subs_present_no,axiom,
    ! [L1,H1,L2,H2] :
      ( ~ axis_subsumes(L1,H1,L2,H2)
     => subs_verdict(L1,H1,present,L2,H2,present) = conflict ) ).

fof(no_subs_hint,axiom,
    ~ axis_subsumes(v0,v800,v0,v600) ).

fof(odrl653,conjecture,
    subs_verdict(v0,v800,present,v0,v600,present) = conflict ).

fof(subgoal_0,plain,
    subs_verdict(v0,v800,present,v0,v600,present) = conflict,
    inference(strip,[],[odrl653]) ).

fof(negate_0_0,plain,
    subs_verdict(v0,v800,present,v0,v600,present) != conflict,
    inference(negate,[],[subgoal_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_0,plain,
    subs_verdict(v0,v800,present,v0,v600,present) != conflict,
    inference(canonicalize,[],[negate_0_0]) ).

fof(normalize_0_1,plain,
    ! [H1,H2,L1,L2] :
      ( subs_verdict(L1,H1,present,L2,H2,present) = conflict
      | axis_subsumes(L1,H1,L2,H2) ),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[subs_present_no]) ).

fof(normalize_0_2,plain,
    ! [H1,H2,L1,L2] :
      ( subs_verdict(L1,H1,present,L2,H2,present) = conflict
      | axis_subsumes(L1,H1,L2,H2) ),
    inference(specialize,[],[normalize_0_1]) ).

fof(normalize_0_3,plain,
    ~ axis_subsumes(v0,v800,v0,v600),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[no_subs_hint]) ).

cnf(refute_0_0,plain,
    subs_verdict(v0,v800,present,v0,v600,present) != conflict,
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_0]) ).

cnf(refute_0_1,plain,
    ( subs_verdict(L1,H1,present,L2,H2,present) = conflict
    | axis_subsumes(L1,H1,L2,H2) ),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_2]) ).

cnf(refute_0_2,plain,
    ( subs_verdict(v0,v800,present,v0,v600,present) = conflict
    | axis_subsumes(v0,v800,v0,v600) ),
    inference(subst,[],[refute_0_1:[bind(H1,$fot(v800)),bind(H2,$fot(v600)),bind(L1,$fot(v0)),bind(L2,$fot(v0))]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_3,plain,
    ( conflict != conflict
    | subs_verdict(v0,v800,present,v0,v600,present) != conflict
    | subs_verdict(v0,v800,present,v0,v600,present) = conflict ),
    introduced(tautology,[equality,[$cnf( $equal(subs_verdict(v0,v800,present,v0,v600,present),conflict) ),[1],$fot(conflict)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_4,plain,
    ( conflict != conflict
    | subs_verdict(v0,v800,present,v0,v600,present) = conflict
    | axis_subsumes(v0,v800,v0,v600) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(subs_verdict(v0,v800,present,v0,v600,present),conflict) )],[refute_0_2,refute_0_3]) ).

cnf(refute_0_5,plain,
    ( conflict != conflict
    | axis_subsumes(v0,v800,v0,v600) ),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(subs_verdict(v0,v800,present,v0,v600,present),conflict) )],[refute_0_4,refute_0_0]) ).

cnf(refute_0_6,plain,
    conflict = conflict,
    introduced(tautology,[refl,[$fot(conflict)]]) ).

cnf(refute_0_7,plain,
    axis_subsumes(v0,v800,v0,v600),
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( $equal(conflict,conflict) )],[refute_0_6,refute_0_5]) ).

cnf(refute_0_8,plain,
    ~ axis_subsumes(v0,v800,v0,v600),
    inference(canonicalize,[],[normalize_0_3]) ).

cnf(refute_0_9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[$cnf( axis_subsumes(v0,v800,v0,v600) )],[refute_0_7,refute_0_8]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MGT094+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : metis --show proof --show saturation %s
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 14:25:15 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.38  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 4.37/4.62  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.37/4.62  
% 4.37/4.62  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.37/4.62  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------