↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : MGT094+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:13:04 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.47s 6.07s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   23 (  15 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   20 (  12   ~;   7   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-6 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (   0 sgn  20   !;   0   ?;   8   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f36,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ axis_subsumes(X0,X1,X2,X3)
     => subs_verdict(X0,X1,present,X2,X3,present) = conflict ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+7.ax',subs_present_no) ).

fof(f79,axiom,
    ~ axis_subsumes(v0,v800,v0,v600),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',no_subs_hint) ).

fof(f80,conjecture,
    subs_verdict(v0,v800,present,v0,v600,present) = conflict,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',odrl653) ).

fof(f81,negated_conjecture,
    subs_verdict(v0,v800,present,v0,v600,present) != conflict,
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f80]) ).

fof(f82,plain,
    conflict != subs_verdict(v0,v800,present,v0,v600,present),
    inference(flattening,[],[f81]) ).

fof(f116,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
      ( axis_subsumes(X0,X1,X2,X3)
      | subs_verdict(X0,X1,present,X2,X3,present) = conflict ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f36]) ).

fof(f172,plain,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( axis_subsumes(X0,X1,X2,X3)
      | conflict = subs_verdict(X0,X1,present,X2,X3,present) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f116]) ).

fof(f236,plain,
    ~ axis_subsumes(v0,v800,v0,v600),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f79]) ).

fof(f237,plain,
    conflict != subs_verdict(v0,v800,present,v0,v600,present),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f82]) ).

tcf(c_87,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( axis_subsumes(X0,X1,X2,X3)
      | ( subs_verdict(X0,X1,present,X2,X3,present) = conflict ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f172]) ).

tcf(c_151,plain,
    ~ axis_subsumes(v0,v800,v0,v600),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f236]) ).

tcf(c_152,negated_conjecture,
    subs_verdict(v0,v800,present,v0,v600,present) != conflict,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f237]) ).

tcf(c_764,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( ( subs_verdict(X0,X1,present,X2,X3,present) = conflict )
      | ( X3 != v600 )
      | ( X2 != v0 )
      | ( X1 != v800 )
      | ( X0 != v0 ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_87,c_151]) ).

tcf(c_765,plain,
    subs_verdict(v0,v800,present,v0,v600,present) = conflict,
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_764]) ).

tcf(c_766,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_765,c_152]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MGT094+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/5.37  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/5.37  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:22:28 UTC 2026
% 0.10/5.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/5.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.15/5.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/5.42  
% 0.15/5.42  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.15/5.42  
% 0.15/5.42  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.15/5.44  % Proving...
% 1.47/6.07  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.47/6.07  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.47/6.07  
% 1.47/6.07  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.47/6.07  
% 1.47/6.07  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.47/6.07  
% 1.47/6.07  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.47/6.07  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.47/6.07  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.47/6.07  
% 1.47/6.07  % ------ Parsing...
% 1.47/6.07  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.47/6.07  
% 1.47/6.07  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s % 
% 1.47/6.07  
% 1.47/6.07  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.47/6.07  
% 1.47/6.07  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.47/6.07  
% 1.47/6.07  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------