↑ Up

lazyCoP---0.1.THM-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : lazyCoP---0.1
% Problem  : MGT094+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:13:24 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.37s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MGT094+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : vampire -t 0 --mode clausify %d -updr off -nm 2 -erd input_only -icip on | lazycop
% 0.07/0.36  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 14:26:28 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.37  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.12/0.37  % SZS output begin IncompleteProof
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(c0, axiom,
% 0.12/0.37  	conflict != subs_verdict(v0,v800,present,v0,v600,present)).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(c1, plain,
% 0.12/0.37  	conflict != subs_verdict(v0,v800,present,v0,v600,present),
% 0.12/0.37  	inference(start, [], [c0])).
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(c2, axiom,
% 0.12/0.37  	conflict = subs_verdict(X0,X1,present,X2,X3,present) | axis_subsumes(X0,X1,X2,X3)).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(a0, assumption,
% 0.12/0.37  	subs_verdict(v0,v800,present,v0,v600,present) = subs_verdict(X0,X1,present,X2,X3,present)).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(c3, plain,
% 0.12/0.37  	$false,
% 0.12/0.37  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(c4, plain,
% 0.12/0.37  	axis_subsumes(X0,X1,X2,X3),
% 0.12/0.37  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(c5, plain,
% 0.12/0.37  	X4 != conflict | conflict != X4,
% 0.12/0.37  	inference(strict_function_extension, [assumptions([a0])], [c1, c2])).
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(a1, assumption,
% 0.12/0.37  	X4 = conflict).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(c6, plain,
% 0.12/0.37  	conflict != X4,
% 0.12/0.37  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a1])], [c5])).
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(a2, assumption,
% 0.12/0.37  	conflict = X4).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(c7, plain,
% 0.12/0.37  	$false,
% 0.12/0.37  	inference(reflexivity, [assumptions([a2])], [c6])).
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(c8, axiom,
% 0.12/0.37  	~axis_subsumes(v0,v800,v0,v600)).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(a3, assumption,
% 0.12/0.37  	X0 = v0).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(a4, assumption,
% 0.12/0.37  	X1 = v800).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(a5, assumption,
% 0.12/0.37  	X2 = v0).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(a6, assumption,
% 0.12/0.37  	X3 = v600).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(c9, plain,
% 0.12/0.37  	$false,
% 0.12/0.37  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a3, a4, a5, a6])], [c4, c8])).
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(c10, plain,
% 0.12/0.37  	$false,
% 0.12/0.37  	inference(strict_predicate_extension, [assumptions([a3, a4, a5, a6])], [c4, c8])).
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  cnf(c11, plain,
% 0.12/0.37  	$false,
% 0.12/0.37  	inference(constraint_solving, [
% 0.12/0.37  		bind(X0, v0),
% 0.12/0.37  		bind(X1, v800),
% 0.12/0.37  		bind(X2, v0),
% 0.12/0.37  		bind(X3, v600),
% 0.12/0.37  		bind(X4, conflict)
% 0.12/0.37  	],
% 0.12/0.37  	[a0, a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, a6])).
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  % SZS output end IncompleteProof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------