↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.UNS-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : MGT102+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:09:55 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.12s 0.38s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : MGT102+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.08/0.33  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.33  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.33  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.33  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 14:37:56 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.37  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.12/0.37  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S032N
% 0.12/0.37  # and selection function SelectUnlessUniqMax.
% 0.12/0.37  #
% 0.12/0.37  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.12/0.37  # Number of axioms: 55 Number of unprocessed: 53
% 0.12/0.37  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.12/0.37  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.12/0.37  # Hello from C++
% 0.12/0.37  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.12/0.37  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.12/0.37  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.12/0.37  # 53 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.12/0.37  # No conjectures after preprocessing.  Attempting to resurrect them from ax_archive.
% 0.12/0.37  # No conjectures.
% 0.12/0.37  # There are 53 start rule candidates:
% 0.12/0.37  # Found 18 unit axioms.
% 0.12/0.37  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.12/0.37  # 53 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.12/0.37  # 35 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.12/0.37  # 18 unit axiom clauses
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.38  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.38  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.38  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.38  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_33, plain, (is_verdict(conflict))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_34, plain, (is_verdict(compatible))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (is_verdict(unknown))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_46, plain, (val(v0))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (val(v600))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_48, plain, (val(v700))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_49, plain, (less(v0,v600))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_50, plain, (less(v600,v700))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_55, plain, (less(v700,v600))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (leq(X1,X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_42, plain, (box_verdict(compatible,compatible)=compatible)).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_36, plain, (compatible!=conflict)).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_37, plain, (unknown!=conflict)).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_38, plain, (compatible!=unknown)).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_53, plain, (v0!=v600)).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_52, plain, (v0!=v700)).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_51, plain, (v700!=v600)).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_1, plain, (~less(X1,X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (less(X1,X2)|~in_lopen(X2,X1,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (less(X1,X2)|~in_ropen(X1,X3,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (less(X1,X2)|~in_open(X2,X1,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~less(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (less(X1,X2)|~in_open(X1,X3,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~in_closed(X2,X1,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~in_closed(X1,X3,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_39, plain, (X1=unknown|X1=compatible|X1=conflict|~is_verdict(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~in_lopen(X1,X3,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~in_ropen(X2,X1,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (X1=X2|~leq(X2,X1)|~leq(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X1=X2|less(X1,X2)|~leq(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (in_closed(X1,X2,X3)|~leq(X1,X3)|~leq(X2,X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_40, plain, (box_verdict(X1,conflict)=conflict|~is_verdict(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_41, plain, (box_verdict(conflict,X1)=conflict|~is_verdict(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_3, plain, (X1=X2|less(X1,X2)|less(X2,X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (in_lopen(X1,X2,X3)|~leq(X1,X3)|~less(X2,X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (in_ropen(X1,X2,X3)|~leq(X2,X1)|~less(X1,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (in_open(X1,X2,X3)|~less(X1,X3)|~less(X2,X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_2, plain, (less(X1,X2)|~less(X3,X2)|~less(X1,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_9, plain, (less(X1,X2)|~leq(X1,X3)|~less(X3,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_10, plain, (less(X1,X2)|~leq(X3,X2)|~less(X1,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_11, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~leq(X3,X2)|~leq(X1,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_30, plain, (axis_subsumes(X1,X2,X3,X4)|~in_closed(esk3_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X3,X4))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_43, plain, (box_verdict(X1,unknown)=unknown|X1=conflict|~is_verdict(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (~axis_conflict(X1,X2,X3,X4)|~in_closed(X5,X3,X4)|~in_closed(X5,X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_44, plain, (box_verdict(unknown,X1)=unknown|X1=conflict|~is_verdict(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_32, plain, (in_closed(X1,X2,X3)|~axis_subsumes(X4,X5,X2,X3)|~in_closed(X1,X4,X5))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_27, plain, (axis_compatible(X1,X2,X3,X4)|~in_closed(X5,X3,X4)|~in_closed(X5,X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_45, plain, (box_verdict(X1,X2)=unknown|box_verdict(X1,X2)=compatible|box_verdict(X1,X2)=conflict|~is_verdict(X2)|~is_verdict(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_28, plain, (in_closed(esk2_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X3,X4)|~axis_compatible(X1,X2,X3,X4))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_29, plain, (in_closed(esk2_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X1,X2)|~axis_compatible(X1,X2,X3,X4))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (axis_conflict(X1,X2,X3,X4)|in_closed(esk1_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X3,X4))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_25, plain, (axis_conflict(X1,X2,X3,X4)|in_closed(esk1_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_31, plain, (axis_subsumes(X1,X2,X3,X4)|in_closed(esk3_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.38  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.38  # Found 6 steps
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (leq(X8,X8)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_72, plain, (leq(X8,X8)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_12])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_2221, plain, (~leq(X8,X8)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_2219, plain, (in_closed(X8,X8,X8)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_26])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_2268, plain, (~in_closed(X8,X8,X8)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_2219])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_2266, plain, (~axis_conflict(X8,X8,X8,X8)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_2266, ...])).
% 0.12/0.38  # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.38  # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.38  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.12/0.38  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.12/0.38  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.38  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.38  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.38  # End clausification derivation
% 0.12/0.38  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_33, plain, (is_verdict(conflict))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_34, plain, (is_verdict(compatible))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_35, plain, (is_verdict(unknown))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_46, plain, (val(v0))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_47, plain, (val(v600))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_48, plain, (val(v700))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_49, plain, (less(v0,v600))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_50, plain, (less(v600,v700))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_55, plain, (less(v700,v600))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (leq(X1,X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_42, plain, (box_verdict(compatible,compatible)=compatible)).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_36, plain, (compatible!=conflict)).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_37, plain, (unknown!=conflict)).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_38, plain, (compatible!=unknown)).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_53, plain, (v0!=v600)).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_52, plain, (v0!=v700)).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_51, plain, (v700!=v600)).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_1, plain, (~less(X1,X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_17, plain, (less(X1,X2)|~in_lopen(X2,X1,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (less(X1,X2)|~in_ropen(X1,X3,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (less(X1,X2)|~in_open(X2,X1,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~less(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (less(X1,X2)|~in_open(X1,X3,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~in_closed(X2,X1,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_13, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~in_closed(X1,X3,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_39, plain, (X1=unknown|X1=compatible|X1=conflict|~is_verdict(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_16, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~in_lopen(X1,X3,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~in_ropen(X2,X1,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (X1=X2|~leq(X2,X1)|~leq(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_6, plain, (X1=X2|less(X1,X2)|~leq(X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_12, plain, (in_closed(X1,X2,X3)|~leq(X1,X3)|~leq(X2,X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_40, plain, (box_verdict(X1,conflict)=conflict|~is_verdict(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_41, plain, (box_verdict(conflict,X1)=conflict|~is_verdict(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_3, plain, (X1=X2|less(X1,X2)|less(X2,X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_15, plain, (in_lopen(X1,X2,X3)|~leq(X1,X3)|~less(X2,X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (in_ropen(X1,X2,X3)|~leq(X2,X1)|~less(X1,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (in_open(X1,X2,X3)|~less(X1,X3)|~less(X2,X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_2, plain, (less(X1,X2)|~less(X3,X2)|~less(X1,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_9, plain, (less(X1,X2)|~leq(X1,X3)|~less(X3,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_10, plain, (less(X1,X2)|~leq(X3,X2)|~less(X1,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_11, plain, (leq(X1,X2)|~leq(X3,X2)|~leq(X1,X3))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_30, plain, (axis_subsumes(X1,X2,X3,X4)|~in_closed(esk3_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X3,X4))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_43, plain, (box_verdict(X1,unknown)=unknown|X1=conflict|~is_verdict(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_26, plain, (~axis_conflict(X1,X2,X3,X4)|~in_closed(X5,X3,X4)|~in_closed(X5,X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_44, plain, (box_verdict(unknown,X1)=unknown|X1=conflict|~is_verdict(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_32, plain, (in_closed(X1,X2,X3)|~axis_subsumes(X4,X5,X2,X3)|~in_closed(X1,X4,X5))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_27, plain, (axis_compatible(X1,X2,X3,X4)|~in_closed(X5,X3,X4)|~in_closed(X5,X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_45, plain, (box_verdict(X1,X2)=unknown|box_verdict(X1,X2)=compatible|box_verdict(X1,X2)=conflict|~is_verdict(X2)|~is_verdict(X1))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_28, plain, (in_closed(esk2_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X3,X4)|~axis_compatible(X1,X2,X3,X4))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_29, plain, (in_closed(esk2_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X1,X2)|~axis_compatible(X1,X2,X3,X4))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (axis_conflict(X1,X2,X3,X4)|in_closed(esk1_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X3,X4))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_25, plain, (axis_conflict(X1,X2,X3,X4)|in_closed(esk1_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_31, plain, (axis_subsumes(X1,X2,X3,X4)|in_closed(esk3_4(X1,X2,X3,X4),X1,X2))).
% 0.12/0.38  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.12/0.38  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.12/0.38  # Found 5 steps
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_55, plain, (less(v700,v600)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_71, plain, (less(v700,v600)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_5])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_1619, plain, (leq(v700,v600)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_7])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_1637, plain, (v700=v600), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_51])).
% 0.12/0.38  cnf(i_0_1639, plain, (~leq(v600,v700)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_1639, ...])).
% 0.12/0.38  # End printing tableau
% 0.12/0.38  # SZS output end
% 0.12/0.38  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.12/0.38  # Child (1653464) has found a proof.
% 0.12/0.38  
% 0.12/0.39  # Proof search is over...
% 0.12/0.39  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------