↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : MGT103+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:48:28 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.24s 1.61s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   38 (   9 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   36 (  16   ~;  14   |;   4   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (   0 sgn  11   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(leq_antisym,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( leq(X1,X2)
        & leq(X2,X1) )
     => X1 = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax',leq_antisym) ).

fof(leq_def,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( leq(X1,X2)
    <=> ( less(X1,X2)
        | X1 = X2 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax',leq_def) ).

fof(irreflexive,axiom,
    ! [X1] : ~ less(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax',irreflexive) ).

fof(contradiction,axiom,
    ( less(v800,v600)
    & less(v600,v800) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',contradiction) ).

fof(ord_v600_v800,axiom,
    less(v600,v800),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ord_v600_v800) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X78,X79] :
      ( ~ leq(X78,X79)
      | ~ leq(X79,X78)
      | X78 = X79 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_antisym])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X76,X77] :
      ( ( ~ leq(X76,X77)
        | less(X76,X77)
        | X76 = X77 )
      & ( ~ less(X76,X77)
        | leq(X76,X77) )
      & ( X76 != X77
        | leq(X76,X77) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_def])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ leq(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ less(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ less(X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X1] : ~ less(X1,X1),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[irreflexive]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ less(X2,X1)
    | ~ less(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    less(v800,v600),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[contradiction]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    less(v600,v800),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ord_v600_v800]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X70] : ~ less(X70,X70),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    v800 = v600,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ~ less(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : MGT103+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.14/0.32  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.32  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 23:33:35 EDT 2026
% 0.14/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.33  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.24/1.61  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 0.24/1.61  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/1.61  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/1.61  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.61  % Total time : 1.270s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------