%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : MGT103+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:27:03 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.41s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 21 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 17 ( 9 ~; 5 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 14 ( 0 sgn 9 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(transitive,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3] :
( ( less(X2,X3)
& less(X1,X2) )
=> less(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax',transitive) ).
fof(irreflexive,axiom,
! [X1] : ~ less(X1,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax',irreflexive) ).
fof(contradiction,axiom,
( less(v600,v800)
& less(v800,v600) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',contradiction) ).
fof(ord_v600_v800,axiom,
less(v600,v800),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ord_v600_v800) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X14,X15,X16] :
( less(X14,X16)
| ~ less(X15,X16)
| ~ less(X14,X15) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[transitive])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X1] : ~ less(X1,X1),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[irreflexive]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ less(X2,X3)
| ~ less(X1,X2)
| less(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
less(v800,v600),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[contradiction]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X13] : ~ less(X13,X13),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ less(X1,v800)
| less(X1,v600) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
less(v600,v800),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ord_v600_v800]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
~ less(X1,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : MGT103+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.34 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.34 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.34 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:25:06 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.34 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.38 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.38 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.41 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.41 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.41 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.41 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.41 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3862046 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.41 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/0.41 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.41 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.41 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.41 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.41 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.41 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.41 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.41 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 % Starting U----_206c_10_B11_00_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3862061 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.41 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/0.41 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.41 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.41 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.41 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.41 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.41 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.41 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.41 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.41 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.41
% 0.15/0.41 % Proof found!
% 0.15/0.41 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.41 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.41 % Parsed axioms : 34
% 0.15/0.41 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.41 % Initial clauses : 55
% 0.15/0.41 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.41 % Initial clauses in saturation : 55
% 0.15/0.41 % Processed clauses : 37
% 0.15/0.41 % ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.15/0.41 % ...subsumed : 1
% 0.15/0.41 % ...remaining for further processing : 35
% 0.15/0.41 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 0.15/0.41 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.41 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.41 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/0.41 % Generated clauses : 14
% 0.15/0.41 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 8
% 0.15/0.41 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.41 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.41 % Paramodulations : 10
% 0.15/0.41 % Factorizations : 2
% 0.15/0.41 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.41 % Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.15/0.41 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.41 % Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.15/0.41 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.15/0.41 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.41 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.41 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.41 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.41 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.41 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/0.41 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/0.41 % Current number of processed clauses : 33
% 0.15/0.41 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 10
% 0.15/0.41 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.41 % Negative unit clauses : 7
% 0.15/0.41 % Non-unit-clauses : 16
% 0.15/0.41 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 26
% 0.15/0.41 % ...number of literals in the above : 83
% 0.15/0.41 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/0.41 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.41 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 59
% 0.15/0.41 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 57
% 0.15/0.41 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.15/0.41 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.15/0.41 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/0.41 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.41 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/0.41 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/0.41 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/0.41 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3200
% 0.15/0.41 % Search garbage collected termcells : 736
% 0.15/0.41
% 0.15/0.41 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41 % User time : 0.009 s
% 0.15/0.41 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.41 % Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.15/0.41 % Maximum resident set size: 3616 pages
% 0.15/0.41
% 0.15/0.41 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.41 % User time : 0.030 s
% 0.15/0.41 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.15/0.41 % Total time : 0.039 s
% 0.15/0.41 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.15/0.41 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------