↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : MGT103+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:20:02 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.54s
% Output   : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : MGT103+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 14:39:37 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.54  
% 0.22/0.54  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.22/0.54  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.22/0.54  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.54  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.22/0.54  SPASS derived 2 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 52 clauses.
% 0.22/0.54  SPASS allocated 98001 KBytes.
% 0.22/0.54  SPASS spent	0:00:00.16 on the problem.
% 0.22/0.54  		0:00:00.06 for the input.
% 0.22/0.54  		0:00:00.06 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.22/0.54  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.22/0.54  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.22/0.54  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.22/0.54  
% 0.22/0.54  
% 0.22/0.54  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 6 :
% 0.22/0.54  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.22/0.54  9[0:Inp] ||  -> less(v800,v600)*l.
% 0.22/0.54  10[0:Inp] ||  -> less(v600,v800)*r.
% 0.22/0.54  14[0:Inp] || less(u,u)* -> .
% 0.22/0.54  32[0:Inp] || less(u,v)* less(v,w)* -> less(u,w)*.
% 0.22/0.54  58[0:OCh:32.1,32.0,9.0,10.0] ||  -> less(v600,v600)*.
% 0.22/0.54  59[0:MRR:58.0,14.0] ||  -> .
% 0.22/0.54  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.22/0.54  Formulae used in the proof : contradiction irreflexive transitive
% 0.22/0.54  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------