↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : MGT106+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:48:29 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.25s 1.61s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   76 (  18 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   68 (  28   ~;  29   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   37 (   1 sgn  23   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(leq_antisym,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( leq(X1,X2)
        & leq(X2,X1) )
     => X1 = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax',leq_antisym) ).

fof(wit_leq,axiom,
    leq(v800,w),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',wit_leq) ).

fof(leq_def,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( leq(X1,X2)
    <=> ( less(X1,X2)
        | X1 = X2 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax',leq_def) ).

fof(transitive,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ( less(X1,X2)
        & less(X2,X3) )
     => less(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax',transitive) ).

fof(in_lopen,axiom,
    ! [X1,X4,X5] :
      ( in_lopen(X1,X4,X5)
    <=> ( less(X4,X1)
        & leq(X1,X5) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+2.ax',in_lopen) ).

fof(ord_v600_v800,axiom,
    less(v600,v800),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ord_v600_v800) ).

fof(wit_in_lopen,axiom,
    in_lopen(w,v0,v600),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',wit_in_lopen) ).

fof(irreflexive,axiom,
    ! [X1] : ~ less(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/MGT002+0.ax',irreflexive) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X78,X79] :
      ( ~ leq(X78,X79)
      | ~ leq(X79,X78)
      | X78 = X79 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_antisym])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ leq(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    leq(v800,w),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[wit_leq]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X76,X77] :
      ( ( ~ leq(X76,X77)
        | less(X76,X77)
        | X76 = X77 )
      & ( ~ less(X76,X77)
        | leq(X76,X77) )
      & ( X76 != X77
        | leq(X76,X77) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[leq_def])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X71,X72,X73] :
      ( ~ less(X71,X72)
      | ~ less(X72,X73)
      | less(X71,X73) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[transitive])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X94,X95,X96] :
      ( ( less(X95,X94)
        | ~ in_lopen(X94,X95,X96) )
      & ( leq(X94,X96)
        | ~ in_lopen(X94,X95,X96) )
      & ( ~ less(X95,X94)
        | ~ leq(X94,X96)
        | in_lopen(X94,X95,X96) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[in_lopen])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( w = v800
    | ~ leq(w,v800) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ less(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( less(X1,X3)
    | ~ less(X1,X2)
    | ~ less(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    less(v600,v800),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ord_v600_v800]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( leq(X1,X2)
    | ~ in_lopen(X1,X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    in_lopen(w,v0,v600),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[wit_in_lopen]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X1] : ~ less(X1,X1),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[irreflexive]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( w = v800
    | ~ less(w,v800) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( less(X1,v800)
    | ~ less(X1,v600) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( less(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2
    | ~ leq(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    leq(w,v600),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

fof(c_0_25,plain,
    ! [X70] : ~ less(X70,X70),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( w = v800
    | ~ less(w,v600) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( w = v600
    | less(w,v600) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ~ less(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( w = v600
    | w = v800 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ~ less(v800,v600),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( w = v600
    | v800 != v600 ),
    inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( w = v800
    | less(v800,w) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    w = v600,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_29]),c_0_30]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    v800 = v600,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_33]),c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_34]),c_0_28]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : MGT106+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.32  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.32  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 23:33:29 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.33  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.25/1.61  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 0.25/1.61  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/1.61  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/1.61  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/1.61  % Total time : 1.271s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------