%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : MGT107+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:00:55 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 4.82s 3.01s
% Output : Refutation 5.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 33
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 67 ( 27 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 191 ( 53 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 459 ( 17 ~; 19 |; 56 &; 318 @)
% ( 8 <=>; 41 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 13 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 20 ( 18 usr; 7 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 117 ( 0 ^; 111 !; 6 ?; 117 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(less_decl,type,
less: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(leq_decl,type,
leq: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(in_closed_decl,type,
in_closed: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(in_lopen_decl,type,
in_lopen: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(in_ropen_decl,type,
in_ropen: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(in_open_decl,type,
in_open: $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(axis_conflict_decl,type,
axis_conflict: $i > $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(axis_compatible_decl,type,
axis_compatible: $i > $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(axis_subsumes_decl,type,
axis_subsumes: $i > $i > $i > $i > $o ).
thf(is_verdict_decl,type,
is_verdict: $i > $o ).
thf(conflict_decl,type,
conflict: $i ).
thf(compatible_decl,type,
compatible: $i ).
thf(unknown_decl,type,
unknown: $i ).
thf(box_verdict_decl,type,
box_verdict: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(val_decl,type,
val: $i > $o ).
thf(v600_decl,type,
v600: $i ).
thf(v800_decl,type,
v800: $i ).
thf(w_decl,type,
w: $i ).
thf(29,axiom,
v800 @ val,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',val_v800) ).
thf(153,plain,
v800 @ val,
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[29]) ).
thf(5,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( B @ leq ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ leq ) ) )
=> ( A = B ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',leq_antisym) ).
thf(52,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( A @ ( B @ leq ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ leq ) ) )
=> ( A = B ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).
thf(20,axiom,
conflict != compatible,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',verdicts_distinct_cf_cp) ).
thf(117,plain,
conflict != compatible,
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[20]) ).
thf(26,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( B != conflict )
& ( A != conflict )
& ( ( B = unknown )
| ( A = unknown ) )
& ( B @ is_verdict )
& ( A @ is_verdict ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( A @ box_verdict ) )
= unknown ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',box_unknown) ).
thf(141,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( B != conflict )
& ( A != conflict )
& ( ( B = unknown )
| ( A = unknown ) )
& ( B @ is_verdict )
& ( A @ is_verdict ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( A @ box_verdict ) )
= unknown ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[26]) ).
thf(12,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ in_ropen ) ) )
<=> ( ( C @ ( A @ less ) )
& ( A @ ( B @ leq ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',in_ropen) ).
thf(77,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( ( C @ ( A @ less ) )
& ( A @ ( B @ leq ) ) )
=> ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ in_ropen ) ) ) )
& ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ in_ropen ) ) )
=> ( ( C @ ( A @ less ) )
& ( A @ ( B @ leq ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
thf(24,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( ( B = conflict )
| ( A = conflict ) )
& ( B @ is_verdict )
& ( A @ is_verdict ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( A @ box_verdict ) )
= conflict ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',box_conflict) ).
thf(129,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( ( B = conflict )
| ( A = conflict ) )
& ( B @ is_verdict )
& ( A @ is_verdict ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( A @ box_verdict ) )
= conflict ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[24]) ).
thf(8,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( C @ ( B @ leq ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ less ) ) )
=> ( C @ ( A @ less ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',less_leq_trans) ).
thf(59,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( C @ ( B @ leq ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ less ) ) )
=> ( C @ ( A @ less ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(3,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( A @ ( B @ less ) )
| ( A = B )
| ( B @ ( A @ less ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',trichotomy) ).
thf(39,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( A @ ( B @ less ) )
| ( A = B )
| ( B @ ( A @ less ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).
thf(22,axiom,
compatible != unknown,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',verdicts_distinct_cp_un) ).
thf(123,plain,
compatible != unknown,
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[22]) ).
thf(10,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ in_closed ) ) )
<=> ( ( C @ ( A @ leq ) )
& ( A @ ( B @ leq ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',in_closed) ).
thf(63,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( ( C @ ( A @ leq ) )
& ( A @ ( B @ leq ) ) )
=> ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ in_closed ) ) ) )
& ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ in_closed ) ) )
=> ( ( C @ ( A @ leq ) )
& ( A @ ( B @ leq ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).
thf(30,axiom,
v800 @ ( v600 @ less ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ord_v600_v800) ).
thf(154,plain,
v800 @ ( v600 @ less ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[30]) ).
thf(15,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ axis_compatible ) ) ) )
<=> ? [E: $i] :
( ( D @ ( C @ ( E @ in_closed ) ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ ( E @ in_closed ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axis_compatible_def) ).
thf(99,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( ? [E: $i] :
( ( D @ ( C @ ( E @ in_closed ) ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ ( E @ in_closed ) ) ) )
=> ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ axis_compatible ) ) ) ) )
& ( ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ axis_compatible ) ) ) )
=> ? [E: $i] :
( ( D @ ( C @ ( E @ in_closed ) ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ ( E @ in_closed ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).
thf(23,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ is_verdict )
=> ( ( A = unknown )
| ( A = compatible )
| ( A = conflict ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',verdict_enum) ).
thf(126,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( A @ is_verdict )
=> ( ( A = unknown )
| ( A = compatible )
| ( A = conflict ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[23]) ).
thf(18,axiom,
compatible @ is_verdict,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',compatible_is_verdict) ).
thf(115,plain,
compatible @ is_verdict,
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[18]) ).
thf(21,axiom,
conflict != unknown,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',verdicts_distinct_cf_un) ).
thf(120,plain,
conflict != unknown,
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[21]) ).
thf(4,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ leq ) )
<=> ( ( A = B )
| ( B @ ( A @ less ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',leq_def) ).
thf(42,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( ( A = B )
| ( B @ ( A @ less ) ) )
=> ( B @ ( A @ leq ) ) )
& ( ( B @ ( A @ leq ) )
=> ( ( A = B )
| ( B @ ( A @ less ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(2,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( C @ ( B @ less ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ less ) ) )
=> ( C @ ( A @ less ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',transitive) ).
thf(37,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( C @ ( B @ less ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ less ) ) )
=> ( C @ ( A @ less ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(28,axiom,
v600 @ val,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',val_v600) ).
thf(152,plain,
v600 @ val,
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[28]) ).
thf(7,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( C @ ( B @ less ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ leq ) ) )
=> ( C @ ( A @ less ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',leq_less_trans) ).
thf(57,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( C @ ( B @ less ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ leq ) ) )
=> ( C @ ( A @ less ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).
thf(16,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ axis_subsumes ) ) ) )
<=> ! [E: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ ( E @ in_closed ) ) )
=> ( D @ ( C @ ( E @ in_closed ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axis_subsumes_def) ).
thf(106,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( ! [E: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ ( E @ in_closed ) ) )
=> ( D @ ( C @ ( E @ in_closed ) ) ) )
=> ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ axis_subsumes ) ) ) ) )
& ( ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ axis_subsumes ) ) ) )
=> ! [E: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ ( E @ in_closed ) ) )
=> ( D @ ( C @ ( E @ in_closed ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).
thf(13,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ in_open ) ) )
<=> ( ( C @ ( A @ less ) )
& ( A @ ( B @ less ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',in_open) ).
thf(84,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( ( C @ ( A @ less ) )
& ( A @ ( B @ less ) ) )
=> ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ in_open ) ) ) )
& ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ in_open ) ) )
=> ( ( C @ ( A @ less ) )
& ( A @ ( B @ less ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).
thf(9,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( C @ ( B @ leq ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ leq ) ) )
=> ( C @ ( A @ leq ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',leq_trans) ).
thf(61,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( C @ ( B @ leq ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ leq ) ) )
=> ( C @ ( A @ leq ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).
thf(19,axiom,
unknown @ is_verdict,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',unknown_is_verdict) ).
thf(116,plain,
unknown @ is_verdict,
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[19]) ).
thf(33,axiom,
w = v800,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',wit_eq2) ).
thf(160,plain,
w = v800,
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[33]) ).
thf(11,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ in_lopen ) ) )
<=> ( ( C @ ( A @ leq ) )
& ( A @ ( B @ less ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',in_lopen) ).
thf(70,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] :
( ( ( ( C @ ( A @ leq ) )
& ( A @ ( B @ less ) ) )
=> ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ in_lopen ) ) ) )
& ( ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ in_lopen ) ) )
=> ( ( C @ ( A @ leq ) )
& ( A @ ( B @ less ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(25,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( B = compatible )
& ( A = compatible )
& ( B @ is_verdict )
& ( A @ is_verdict ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( A @ box_verdict ) )
= compatible ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',box_compatible) ).
thf(137,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( B = compatible )
& ( A = compatible )
& ( B @ is_verdict )
& ( A @ is_verdict ) )
=> ( ( B @ ( A @ box_verdict ) )
= compatible ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[25]) ).
thf(1,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ ( A @ less ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',irreflexive) ).
thf(34,plain,
! [A: $i] :
~ ( A @ ( A @ less ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).
thf(27,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( B @ is_verdict )
& ( A @ is_verdict ) )
=> ( ( ( B @ ( A @ box_verdict ) )
= unknown )
| ( ( B @ ( A @ box_verdict ) )
= compatible )
| ( ( B @ ( A @ box_verdict ) )
= conflict ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',box_verdict_total) ).
thf(149,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( ( B @ is_verdict )
& ( A @ is_verdict ) )
=> ( ( ( B @ ( A @ box_verdict ) )
= unknown )
| ( ( B @ ( A @ box_verdict ) )
= compatible )
| ( ( B @ ( A @ box_verdict ) )
= conflict ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[27]) ).
thf(14,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ axis_conflict ) ) ) )
<=> ~ ? [E: $i] :
( ( D @ ( C @ ( E @ in_closed ) ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ ( E @ in_closed ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axis_conflict_def) ).
thf(91,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
( ( ~ ? [E: $i] :
( ( D @ ( C @ ( E @ in_closed ) ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ ( E @ in_closed ) ) ) )
=> ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ axis_conflict ) ) ) ) )
& ( ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ axis_conflict ) ) ) )
=> ~ ? [E: $i] :
( ( D @ ( C @ ( E @ in_closed ) ) )
& ( B @ ( A @ ( E @ in_closed ) ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
thf(31,axiom,
v600 != v800,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',distinct) ).
thf(155,plain,
v600 != v800,
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[31]) ).
thf(32,axiom,
w = v600,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',wit_eq1) ).
thf(158,plain,
w = v600,
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[32]) ).
thf(6,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ less ) )
=> ( B @ ( A @ leq ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',less_implies_leq) ).
thf(55,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] :
( ( B @ ( A @ less ) )
=> ( B @ ( A @ leq ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(17,axiom,
conflict @ is_verdict,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conflict_is_verdict) ).
thf(114,plain,
conflict @ is_verdict,
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[17]) ).
thf(162,plain,
$false,
inference(e,[status(thm)],[153,52,117,141,77,129,59,39,123,63,154,99,126,115,120,42,37,152,57,106,84,61,116,160,70,137,34,149,91,155,158,55,114]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : MGT107+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.15/0.61 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.61 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.61 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.61 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/0.61 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/0.61 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.61 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.61 % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 00:09:07 UTC 2026
% 0.15/0.62 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.62 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.01/1.21 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.37/1.46 % [INFO] Parsing done (246ms).
% 1.37/1.47 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 2.12/1.87 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 2.12/1.88 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 2.35/1.93 % [INFO] 33 axioms and no conjecture found.
% 2.62/2.04 % [INFO] Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF).
% 2.62/2.05 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 2.62/2.06 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 4.82/3.01 % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.82/3.01 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 4.82/3.01 % Time passed: 2245ms (effective reasoning time: 1528ms)
% 4.82/3.01 % Axioms used in derivation (33): verdicts_distinct_cf_cp, leq_antisym, axis_conflict_def, irreflexive, compatible_is_verdict, transitive, in_open, box_compatible, wit_eq1, wit_eq2, box_conflict, conflict_is_verdict, verdicts_distinct_cp_un, val_v600, ord_v600_v800, verdicts_distinct_cf_un, box_verdict_total, axis_subsumes_def, less_implies_leq, in_ropen, unknown_is_verdict, leq_trans, leq_less_trans, in_closed, in_lopen, distinct, less_leq_trans, axis_compatible_def, trichotomy, verdict_enum, val_v800, box_unknown, leq_def
% 4.82/3.01 % No. of inferences in proof: 67
% 4.82/3.01 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2245 ms resp. 1528 ms w/o parsing
% 5.17/3.10 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.17/3.10 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------