↑ Up

Princess---230619.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Princess---230619
% Problem  : MGT107+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:17:32 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 7.22s 1.79s
% Output   : Proof 13.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : MGT107+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v9.3.1.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s
% 0.08/0.34  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 14:42:52 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM warning: Options -Xverify:none and -noverify were deprecated in JDK 13 and will likely be removed in a future release.
% 0.68/0.70  ________       _____
% 0.68/0.70  ___  __ \_________(_)________________________________
% 0.68/0.70  __  /_/ /_  ___/_  /__  __ \  ___/  _ \_  ___/_  ___/
% 0.68/0.70  _  ____/_  /   _  / _  / / / /__ /  __/(__  )_(__  )
% 0.68/0.70  /_/     /_/    /_/  /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/
% 0.68/0.70  
% 0.68/0.70  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic
% 0.68/0.70  (2023-06-19)
% 0.68/0.70  
% 0.68/0.70  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023
% 0.68/0.70  Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen,
% 0.68/0.70                Amanda Stjerna.
% 0.68/0.70  Free software under BSD-3-Clause.
% 0.68/0.70  
% 0.68/0.70  For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml
% 0.68/0.70  
% 0.68/0.71  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.68/0.73  Running up to 7 provers in parallel.
% 0.68/0.74  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423
% 0.68/0.74  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994
% 0.68/0.74  Prover 3: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996
% 0.68/0.74  Prover 0: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893
% 0.68/0.74  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696
% 0.68/0.74  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288
% 0.68/0.74  Prover 6: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365
% 3.42/1.29  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 3.42/1.29  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 4.16/1.36  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 4.16/1.36  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 4.16/1.37  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 4.16/1.37  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 4.16/1.37  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 7.22/1.73  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.22/1.73  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.22/1.78  Prover 2: proved (1042ms)
% 7.22/1.78  Prover 5: proved (1041ms)
% 7.22/1.78  
% 7.22/1.79  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.22/1.79  
% 7.22/1.79  
% 7.22/1.79  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.22/1.79  
% 7.22/1.80  Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 7.22/1.80  Prover 6: proved (1043ms)
% 7.22/1.80  
% 7.22/1.80  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.22/1.80  
% 8.03/1.80  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470
% 8.03/1.80  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.03/1.80  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089
% 8.03/1.80  Prover 10: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125
% 8.03/1.81  Prover 3: stopped
% 8.03/1.81  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984
% 8.03/1.86  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 8.03/1.88  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 8.03/1.89  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 8.03/1.89  Prover 0: stopped
% 8.83/1.91  Prover 13: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443
% 8.83/1.91  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 8.83/1.93  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 8.83/1.98  Prover 7: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 9.89/2.04  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 9.89/2.06  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 9.89/2.06  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 10.67/2.15  Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 10.67/2.17  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 10.67/2.20  Prover 1: Found proof (size 7)
% 10.67/2.20  Prover 1: proved (1464ms)
% 10.67/2.20  Prover 7: Found proof (size 7)
% 10.67/2.20  Prover 7: proved (405ms)
% 11.15/2.22  Prover 10: stopped
% 11.83/2.31  Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 11.83/2.34  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 11.83/2.35  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 11.83/2.36  Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 11.83/2.37  Prover 13: stopped
% 11.83/2.39  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 12.60/2.42  Prover 4: stopped
% 12.60/2.42  Prover 8: stopped
% 12.60/2.48  Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 13.14/2.52  Prover 11: stopped
% 13.14/2.52  
% 13.14/2.52  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 13.14/2.52  
% 13.14/2.53  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% 13.14/2.54  Assumptions after simplification:
% 13.14/2.54  ---------------------------------
% 13.14/2.54  
% 13.14/2.54    (distinct)
% 13.14/2.55     ~ (v800 = v600) & $i(v800) & $i(v600)
% 13.14/2.55  
% 13.14/2.55    (wit_eq1)
% 13.14/2.55    w = v600 & $i(v600)
% 13.14/2.55  
% 13.14/2.55    (wit_eq2)
% 13.14/2.55    w = v800 & $i(v800)
% 13.14/2.55  
% 13.14/2.55  Further assumptions not needed in the proof:
% 13.14/2.55  --------------------------------------------
% 13.14/2.55  axis_compatible_def, axis_conflict_def, axis_subsumes_def, box_compatible,
% 13.14/2.55  box_conflict, box_unknown, box_verdict_total, compatible_is_verdict,
% 13.14/2.55  conflict_is_verdict, in_closed, in_lopen, in_open, in_ropen, irreflexive,
% 13.14/2.55  leq_antisym, leq_def, leq_less_trans, leq_trans, less_implies_leq,
% 13.14/2.55  less_leq_trans, ord_v600_v800, transitive, trichotomy, unknown_is_verdict,
% 13.14/2.55  val_v600, val_v800, verdict_enum, verdicts_distinct_cf_cp,
% 13.14/2.55  verdicts_distinct_cf_un, verdicts_distinct_cp_un
% 13.14/2.55  
% 13.14/2.55  Those formulas are unsatisfiable:
% 13.14/2.55  ---------------------------------
% 13.14/2.55  
% 13.14/2.55  Begin of proof
% 13.14/2.55  | 
% 13.14/2.55  | ALPHA: (distinct) implies:
% 13.14/2.56  |   (1)   ~ (v800 = v600)
% 13.14/2.56  | 
% 13.14/2.56  | ALPHA: (wit_eq1) implies:
% 13.14/2.56  |   (2)  w = v600
% 13.14/2.56  | 
% 13.14/2.56  | ALPHA: (wit_eq2) implies:
% 13.14/2.56  |   (3)  w = v800
% 13.14/2.56  | 
% 13.14/2.56  | COMBINE_EQS: (2), (3) imply:
% 13.14/2.56  |   (4)  v800 = v600
% 13.14/2.56  | 
% 13.14/2.56  | SIMP: (4) implies:
% 13.14/2.56  |   (5)  v800 = v600
% 13.14/2.56  | 
% 13.14/2.56  | REDUCE: (1), (5) imply:
% 13.14/2.56  |   (6)  $false
% 13.14/2.56  | 
% 13.14/2.56  | CLOSE: (6) is inconsistent.
% 13.14/2.56  | 
% 13.14/2.56  End of proof
% 13.14/2.56  % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark
% 13.14/2.56  
% 13.14/2.56  1858ms
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------