%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : MGT115+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:27:04 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.09s 0.35s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 17 ( 16 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 14 ( 10 ~; 3 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 2 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 0 sgn 4 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conjecture,conjecture,
issue(pi1) != issue(pi2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conjecture) ).
fof(issue_injective,axiom,
! [X1,X2] :
( issue(X1) = issue(X2)
=> X1 = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',issue_injective) ).
fof(pi1_neq_pi2,axiom,
pi1 != pi2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pi1_neq_pi2) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ( issue(pi1) != issue(pi2) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conjecture]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X3,X4] :
( X3 = X4
| issue(X3) != issue(X4) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[issue_injective])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
issue(pi1) = issue(pi2),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
pi1 != pi2,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[pi1_neq_pi2]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( issue(X1) != issue(X2)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
issue(pi1) = issue(pi2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
pi1 != pi2,
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( issue(X1) != issue(pi2)
| X1 = pi1 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
pi1 != pi2,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01 % Problem : MGT115+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.00/0.03 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.04/0.32 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.04/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.04/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.04/0.32 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.04/0.32 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.04/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.04/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.04/0.32 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:26:22 UTC 2026
% 0.04/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.04/0.32 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.34 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.34 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.35 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.09/0.35 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/0.35 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.35 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.35 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.35 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.35 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.35 % new_bool_3 with pid 1307321 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.35 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.09/0.35 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/0.35 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.35 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.35 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.35 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.09/0.35 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.09/0.35 % Search class: FHUSF-FFSS11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.09/0.35 % partial match(1): FHUSF-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.09/0.35 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.09/0.35 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.35 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1307326 completed with status 0
% 0.09/0.35 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.09/0.35 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.09/0.35 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.09/0.35 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.09/0.35 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.35 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.09/0.35 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.09/0.35 % Search class: FHUSF-FFSS11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.09/0.35 % partial match(1): FHUSF-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.09/0.35 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.09/0.35 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.09/0.35 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.09/0.35
% 0.09/0.35 % Proof found!
% 0.09/0.35 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.09/0.35 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.09/0.35 % Parsed axioms : 5
% 0.09/0.35 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.09/0.35 % Initial clauses : 5
% 0.09/0.35 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.09/0.35 % Initial clauses in saturation : 5
% 0.09/0.35 % Processed clauses : 6
% 0.09/0.35 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.09/0.35 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.09/0.35 % ...remaining for further processing : 6
% 0.09/0.35 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.09/0.35 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.09/0.35 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.09/0.35 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.09/0.35 % Generated clauses : 4
% 0.09/0.35 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.09/0.35 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.09/0.35 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.09/0.35 % Paramodulations : 2
% 0.09/0.35 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.09/0.35 % NegExts : 0
% 0.09/0.35 % Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.09/0.35 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.09/0.35 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.09/0.35 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.09/0.35 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.09/0.35 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.09/0.35 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.09/0.35 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.35 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.09/0.35 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.09/0.35 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.35 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.35 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.35 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.35 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.35 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.09/0.35 % Current number of processed clauses : 6
% 0.09/0.35 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.09/0.35 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.09/0.35 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.09/0.35 % Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.09/0.35 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.09/0.35 % ...number of literals in the above : 2
% 0.09/0.35 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.09/0.35 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.09/0.35 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.09/0.35 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.09/0.35 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.09/0.35 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.09/0.35 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.09/0.35 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.09/0.35 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.09/0.35 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.09/0.35 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.09/0.35 % Termbank termtop insertions : 150
% 0.09/0.35 % Search garbage collected termcells : 17
% 0.09/0.35
% 0.09/0.35 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.35 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.09/0.35 % System time : 0.000 s
% 0.09/0.35 % Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.09/0.35 % Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
% 0.09/0.35
% 0.09/0.35 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.09/0.35 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.09/0.35 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.09/0.35 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.09/0.35 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.09/0.35 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------