%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : MGT116+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:27:05 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.11s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 32 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 28 ( 14 ~; 10 |; 3 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 6 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 4 sgn 12 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(conjecture,conjecture,
about_event(s,e1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conjecture) ).
fof(ax_B3,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6] :
( ( founds_rem(X5,X4,X6)
& part_of(X1,X4)
& cnt(X1,decl(X2),X3)
& subjection(X1) )
=> about_event(X1,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_B3) ).
fof(cnt_s,axiom,
cnt(s,decl(some_action),some_target),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cnt_s) ).
fof(subj_s,axiom,
subjection(s),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subj_s) ).
fof(founds_rem1,axiom,
founds_rem(e1,rho_r,f1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',founds_rem1) ).
fof(partof_s,axiom,
part_of(s,rho_r),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',partof_s) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ about_event(s,e1),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conjecture]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X7,X8,X9,X10,X11,X12] :
( about_event(X7,X11)
| ~ founds_rem(X11,X10,X12)
| ~ part_of(X7,X10)
| ~ cnt(X7,decl(X8),X9)
| ~ subjection(X7) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax_B3])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ about_event(s,e1),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ founds_rem(X5,X4,X6)
| ~ part_of(X1,X4)
| ~ cnt(X1,decl(X2),X3)
| ~ subjection(X1)
| about_event(X1,X5) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
cnt(s,decl(some_action),some_target),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[cnt_s]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
subjection(s),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[subj_s]) ).
fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ about_event(s,e1),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ part_of(s,X2)
| ~ founds_rem(X1,X2,X3)
| about_event(s,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
founds_rem(e1,rho_r,f1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[founds_rem1]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
part_of(s,rho_r),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[partof_s]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ about_event(s,e1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]),c_0_16]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : MGT116+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.38 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:29:50 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % new_bool_1 with pid 264801 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.11/0.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.45 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSS11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45 % partial match(1): FHUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % SubtermCWHack with pid 264806 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.11/0.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.11/0.45 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSS11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45 % partial match(1): FHUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.45
% 0.11/0.45 % Proof found!
% 0.11/0.45 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.11/0.45 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.45 % Parsed axioms : 12
% 0.11/0.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 6
% 0.11/0.45 % Initial clauses : 6
% 0.11/0.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 6
% 0.11/0.45 % Processed clauses : 7
% 0.11/0.45 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 7
% 0.11/0.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Generated clauses : 2
% 0.11/0.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.11/0.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Paramodulations : 2
% 0.11/0.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.11/0.45 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 7
% 0.11/0.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.11/0.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.11/0.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.11/0.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 354
% 0.11/0.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 55
% 0.11/0.45
% 0.11/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.45 % User time : 0.002 s
% 0.11/0.45 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 3640 pages
% 0.11/0.45
% 0.11/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.45 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.11/0.45 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.11/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.11/0.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------