%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SPASS---3.9
% Problem : MGT116+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp
% Command : run_spass %d %s
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 8 06:20:03 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.13s 0.42s
% Output : Refutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 11 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 11 RR)
% Number of literals : 21 ( 0 equ; 15 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 12 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(7,axiom,
subjection(s),
file('MGT116+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(8,axiom,
part_of(s,rho_r),
file('MGT116+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(9,axiom,
~ about_event(s,e1),
file('MGT116+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(10,axiom,
founds_rem(e1,rho_r,f1),
file('MGT116+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(11,axiom,
cnt(s,decl(some_action),some_target),
file('MGT116+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(12,axiom,
( ~ subjection(u)
| ~ part_of(u,v)
| ~ founds_rem(w,v,x)
| ~ cnt(u,decl(y),z)
| about_event(u,w) ),
file('MGT116+1.p',unknown),
[] ).
cnf(13,plain,
( ~ subjection(s)
| ~ cnt(s,decl(u),v)
| ~ founds_rem(e1,w,x)
| ~ part_of(s,w) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[12,9]),
[iquote('0:Res:12.4,9.0')] ).
cnf(14,plain,
( ~ part_of(s,u)
| ~ founds_rem(e1,u,v)
| ~ cnt(s,decl(w),x) ),
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[13,7]),
[iquote('0:MRR:13.0,7.0')] ).
cnf(22,plain,
( ~ part_of(s,u)
| ~ founds_rem(e1,u,v) ),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[11,14]),
[iquote('0:Res:11.0,14.2')] ).
cnf(23,plain,
~ part_of(s,rho_r),
inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[10,22]),
[iquote('0:Res:10.0,22.1')] ).
cnf(24,plain,
$false,
inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[23,8]),
[iquote('0:MRR:23.0,8.0')] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : MGT116+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_spass %d %s
% 0.07/0.33 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.33 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.33 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.07/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Sep 7 14:11:42 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.42
% 0.13/0.42 SPASS V 3.9
% 0.13/0.42 SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.13/0.42 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.42 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.42 SPASS derived 3 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 15 clauses.
% 0.13/0.42 SPASS allocated 97630 KBytes.
% 0.13/0.42 SPASS spent 0:00:00.08 on the problem.
% 0.13/0.42 0:00:00.03 for the input.
% 0.13/0.42 0:00:00.02 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.13/0.42 0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.13/0.42 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.13/0.42 0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.13/0.42
% 0.13/0.42
% 0.13/0.42 Here is a proof with depth 3, length 11 :
% 0.13/0.42 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.42 Formulae used in the proof : subj_s partof_s conjecture founds_rem1 cnt_s ax_B3
% 0.13/0.42
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------