↑ Up

SPASS-SCL---0.1.1.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS-SCL---0.1.1
% Problem  : MGT116+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/SPASS-SCL-FOL -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:20:16 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.08s 0.34s
% Output   : Proof 0.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   26 (  22 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   42 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   28 (  12   ~;   8   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   3 sgn  18   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% FILE RECORD
fof(ax_B3,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( subjection(X1)
        & cnt(X1,decl(X2),X3)
        & part_of(X1,X4)
        & founds_rem(X5,X4,X6) )
     => about_event(X1,X5) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ax_B3) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(ax_B3_elimTB,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( subjection(X1)
        & cnt(X1,decl(X2),X3)
        & part_of(X1,X4)
        & founds_rem(X5,X4,X6) )
     => about_event(X1,X5) ),
    inference(elimTB,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax_B3])]) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(ax_B3_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
      ( ~ subjection(X1)
      | ~ cnt(X1,decl(X2),X3)
      | ~ part_of(X1,X4)
      | ! [X6] : ~ founds_rem(X5,X4,X6)
      | about_event(X1,X5) ),
    inference(elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,[status(thm)],[ax_B3_elimTB]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_1,plain,
    ( ~ subjection(X0)
    | ~ cnt(X0,decl(X1),X2)
    | ~ part_of(X0,X3)
    | ~ founds_rem(X4,X3,X5)
    | about_event(X0,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[ax_B3_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope])]) ).

% FILE RECORD
fof(cnt_s,axiom,
    cnt(s,decl(some_action),some_target),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cnt_s) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(cnt_s_elimTB,axiom,
    cnt(s,decl(some_action),some_target),
    inference(elimTB,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[cnt_s])]) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(cnt_s_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,axiom,
    cnt(s,decl(some_action),some_target),
    inference(elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,[status(thm)],[cnt_s_elimTB]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_9,plain,
    cnt(s,decl(some_action),some_target),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[cnt_s_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope])]) ).

% FILE RECORD
fof(founds_rem1,axiom,
    founds_rem(e1,rho_r,f1),
    file('theBenchmark.p',founds_rem1) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(founds_rem1_elimTB,axiom,
    founds_rem(e1,rho_r,f1),
    inference(elimTB,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[founds_rem1])]) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(founds_rem1_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,axiom,
    founds_rem(e1,rho_r,f1),
    inference(elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,[status(thm)],[founds_rem1_elimTB]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_11,plain,
    founds_rem(e1,rho_r,f1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[founds_rem1_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope])]) ).

% FILE RECORD
fof(conjecture,conjecture,
    about_event(s,e1),
    file('theBenchmark.p',conjecture) ).

% NEGATING CONJECTURE
fof(conjecture_nc,negated_conjecture,
    ~ about_event(s,e1),
    inference(negating_conjecture,[status(cth)],[conjecture]) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(conjecture_nc_elimTB,negated_conjecture,
    ~ about_event(s,e1),
    inference(elimTB,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[conjecture_nc])]) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(conjecture_nc_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,negated_conjecture,
    ~ about_event(s,e1),
    inference(elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,[status(thm)],[conjecture_nc_elimTB]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_12,plain,
    ~ about_event(s,e1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[conjecture_nc_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope])]) ).

% FILE RECORD
fof(partof_s,axiom,
    part_of(s,rho_r),
    file('theBenchmark.p',partof_s) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(partof_s_elimTB,axiom,
    part_of(s,rho_r),
    inference(elimTB,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[partof_s])]) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(partof_s_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,axiom,
    part_of(s,rho_r),
    inference(elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,[status(thm)],[partof_s_elimTB]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_10,plain,
    part_of(s,rho_r),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[partof_s_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope])]) ).

% FILE RECORD
fof(subj_s,axiom,
    subjection(s),
    file('theBenchmark.p',subj_s) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(subj_s_elimTB,axiom,
    subjection(s),
    inference(elimTB,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[subj_s])]) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(subj_s_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,axiom,
    subjection(s),
    inference(elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,[status(thm)],[subj_s_elimTB]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_8,plain,
    subjection(s),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[subj_s_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope])]) ).

% CNF SPASS RESOLUTION.
cnf(c_13,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_1,c_9,c_11,c_12,c_10,c_8]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : MGT116+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/SPASS-SCL-FOL -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.34  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 14:09:26 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/SPASS-SCL-FOL -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.34  
% 0.08/0.34  % Input Clauses:
% 0.08/0.34  % 1:5:6:INP:TopTopTopTopTopTop: subjection(x0),cnt(x0,decl(x1),x2),part_of(x0,x3),founds_rem(x4,x3,x5) -> about_event(x0,x4)
% 0.08/0.34  % 2:1:0:INP::  -> position(s)
% 0.08/0.34  % 3:1:0:INP::  -> legal_relator(rho_r)
% 0.08/0.34  % 4:1:0:INP::  -> rule(f1)
% 0.08/0.34  % 5:1:0:INP::  -> event(e1)
% 0.08/0.34  % 6:1:0:INP::  -> action(some_action)
% 0.08/0.34  % 7:1:0:INP::  -> target(some_target)
% 0.08/0.34  % 8:1:0:INP::  -> subjection(s)
% 0.08/0.34  % 9:1:0:INP::  -> cnt(s,decl(some_action),some_target)
% 0.08/0.34  % 10:1:0:INP::  -> part_of(s,rho_r)
% 0.08/0.34  % 11:1:0:INP::  -> founds_rem(e1,rho_r,f1)
% 0.08/0.34  % 12:1:0:INP:: about_event(s,e1) -> 
% 0.08/0.34  
% 0.08/0.34  % Predicates: subjection cnt part_of founds_rem about_event position legal_relator rule event action target 
% 0.08/0.34  % Fol Constants: s rho_r f1 e1 some_action some_target 
% 0.08/0.34  % Fol Functions: decl 
% 0.08/0.34  % Problem Properties:
% 0.08/0.34  % This is a full first-order problem without equality. The Problem is linear. 
% 0.08/0.34  
% 0.08/0.34  
% 0.08/0.34  % Reduced Input Axiom Clauses:
% 0.08/0.34  % 1:5:6:INP:TopTopTopTopTopTop: subjection(x0),cnt(x0,decl(x1),x2),part_of(x0,x3),founds_rem(x4,x3,x5) -> about_event(x0,x4)
% 0.08/0.34  % 2:1:0:INP::  -> position(s)
% 0.08/0.34  % 3:1:0:INP::  -> legal_relator(rho_r)
% 0.08/0.34  % 4:1:0:INP::  -> rule(f1)
% 0.08/0.34  % 5:1:0:INP::  -> event(e1)
% 0.08/0.34  % 6:1:0:INP::  -> action(some_action)
% 0.08/0.34  % 7:1:0:INP::  -> target(some_target)
% 0.08/0.34  % 8:1:0:INP::  -> subjection(s)
% 0.08/0.34  % 9:1:0:INP::  -> cnt(s,decl(some_action),some_target)
% 0.08/0.34  % 10:1:0:INP::  -> part_of(s,rho_r)
% 0.08/0.34  % 11:1:0:INP::  -> founds_rem(e1,rho_r,f1)
% 0.08/0.34  
% 0.08/0.34  % Reduced Input Conjecture Clauses:
% 0.08/0.34  % 12:1:0:INP:: about_event(s,e1) -> 
% 0.08/0.34  
% 0.08/0.34  
% 0.08/0.34  % === Starting SPASS-SCL-FOL A Little Less Naive, considering 10 atoms initially. Used heuristic: lmodel_grow ===
% 0.08/0.34  
% 0.08/0.34  
% 0.08/0.34  
% 0.08/0.34  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.08/0.34  % Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.34  
% 0.08/0.34  % SPASS-SCL-FOL Statistics:
% 0.08/0.34  % Number of learned clauses: 0
% 0.08/0.34  % Number of propagations: 5
% 0.08/0.34  % Number of decisions: 0
% 0.08/0.34  % Number of resolutions: 5
% 0.08/0.34  % Number of condensations: 0
% 0.08/0.34  % Number of sub resolutions: 0
% 0.08/0.34  
% 0.08/0.34  % Solver is done. Empty clause found
% 0.08/0.34  
% 0.08/0.34  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.08/0.34  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.08/0.34  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.08/0.34  
% 0.08/0.34  
% 0.08/0.34  % Needed:       0:00:00.00
% 0.08/0.34  
% 0.08/0.34  % ###
% 0.08/0.34  % ### Pagesize: 8192
% 0.08/0.34  % ### Marksize: 0
% 0.08/0.34  % ### Memory demanded:  304 KBytes
% 0.08/0.34  % ### Memory freed:     304 KBytes
% 0.08/0.34  % ### Memory remaining: 0 Bytes
% 0.08/0.34  % ### Pages allocated:  134 Pages
% 0.08/0.34  % ###
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------