↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : MGT117+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:04:26 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 58.37s 58.53s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem    : MGT117+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.06/0.33  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.33  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.06/0.33  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.06/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.06/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.06/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon Sep  7 14:09:37 UTC 2026
% 0.06/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.24/0.50  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 58.37/58.52  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.37/58.52  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 58.37/58.52  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 58.37/58.52  % Transform   :cnf
% 58.37/58.52  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 58.37/58.52  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 58.37/58.52  
% 58.37/58.52  % Result      :Theorem 58.009935s
% 58.37/58.52  % Output      :CNFRefutation 58.009935s
% 58.37/58.52  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.37/58.52  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.37/58.52  % File     : MGT117+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v9.3.0.
% 58.37/58.52  % Domain   : Management
% 58.37/58.52  % Problem  : Strong perm creates Disability in assigner (positive conjecture)
% 58.37/58.52  % Version  : Especial.
% 58.37/58.52  % English  : perm(p1) + strong(p1) + activates(e1,p1).
% 58.37/58.52  %            Conjecture: exists Disability(museen, read, museum_api) in
% 58.37/58.52  %            some rho_I. Tests Ax5.2 positive entailment directly.
% 58.37/58.52  
% 58.37/58.52  % Refs     : [MC+26] Mustafa et al. (2026), Axis Decomposition for ODRL
% 58.37/58.52  % Source   : [MC+26]
% 58.37/58.52  % Names    : GRND034-disability-exists-1.p [MC+26]
% 58.37/58.52  
% 58.37/58.52  % Status   : Theorem
% 58.37/58.52  % Rating   : 0.00 v9.3.0
% 58.37/58.52  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (  13 unt;   0 def)
% 58.37/58.52  %            Number of atoms       :   34 (   0 equ)
% 58.37/58.52  %            Maximal formula atoms :   16 (   2 avg)
% 58.37/58.52  %            Number of connectives :   19 (   0   ~;   0   |;  18   &)
% 58.37/58.52  %                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 58.37/58.52  %            Maximal formula depth :   19 (   3 avg)
% 58.37/58.52  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 58.37/58.52  %            Number of predicates  :   18 (  18 usr;   0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 58.37/58.52  %            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-0 aty)
% 58.37/58.52  %            Number of variables   :   11 (   6   !;   5   ?)
% 58.37/58.52  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 58.37/58.52  
% 58.37/58.52  % Comments : 
% 58.37/58.52  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.37/58.52  %----Layer 1: Problem-specific axioms (subset of Ax5.1-5.11, A1-A3, B1-B3)
% 58.37/58.52  fof(ax_perm_relator_strong,axiom,
% 58.37/58.52      ! [P,X,Y,A,T,E] :
% 58.37/58.52        ( ( perm(P)
% 58.37/58.52          & strong(P)
% 58.37/58.52          & aee(P,X)
% 58.37/58.52          & aer(P,Y)
% 58.37/58.52          & act(P,A)
% 58.37/58.52          & tgt(P,T)
% 58.37/58.52          & activates(E,P) )
% 58.37/58.52       => ? [RhoI,Im,Db] :
% 58.37/58.52            ( founds_imm(E,RhoI,P)
% 58.37/58.52            & immunity(Im)
% 58.37/58.52            & bearer(Im,X)
% 58.37/58.52            & cnt(Im,A,T)
% 58.37/58.52            & part_of(Im,RhoI)
% 58.37/58.52            & disability(Db)
% 58.37/58.52            & bearer(Db,Y)
% 58.37/58.52            & cnt(Db,A,T)
% 58.37/58.52            & part_of(Db,RhoI) ) ) ).
% 58.37/58.52  
% 58.37/58.52  %----Ground instance (gamma)
% 58.37/58.52  fof(agent_bibliothek,axiom,
% 58.37/58.52      agent(bibliothek) ).
% 58.37/58.52  
% 58.37/58.52  fof(agent_museen,axiom,
% 58.37/58.52      agent(museen) ).
% 58.37/58.53  
% 58.37/58.53  fof(action_read,axiom,
% 58.37/58.53      action(read) ).
% 58.37/58.53  
% 58.37/58.53  fof(target_museum,axiom,
% 58.37/58.53      target(museum_api) ).
% 58.37/58.53  
% 58.37/58.53  fof(rule_p1,axiom,
% 58.37/58.53      rule(p1) ).
% 58.37/58.53  
% 58.37/58.53  fof(event_e1,axiom,
% 58.37/58.53      event(e1) ).
% 58.37/58.53  
% 58.37/58.53  fof(perm_p1,axiom,
% 58.37/58.53      perm(p1) ).
% 58.37/58.53  
% 58.37/58.53  fof(strong_p1,axiom,
% 58.37/58.53      strong(p1) ).
% 58.37/58.53  
% 58.37/58.53  fof(aee_p1,axiom,
% 58.37/58.53      aee(p1,bibliothek) ).
% 58.37/58.53  
% 58.37/58.53  fof(aer_p1,axiom,
% 58.37/58.53      aer(p1,museen) ).
% 58.37/58.53  
% 58.37/58.53  fof(act_p1,axiom,
% 58.37/58.53      act(p1,read) ).
% 58.37/58.53  
% 58.37/58.53  fof(tgt_p1,axiom,
% 58.37/58.53      tgt(p1,museum_api) ).
% 58.37/58.53  
% 58.37/58.53  fof(act_e1_p1,axiom,
% 58.37/58.53      activates(e1,p1) ).
% 58.37/58.53  
% 58.37/58.53  fof(conjecture,conjecture,
% 58.37/58.53      ? [RhoI,Db] :
% 58.37/58.53        ( founds_imm(e1,RhoI,p1)
% 58.37/58.53        & disability(Db)
% 58.37/58.53        & bearer(Db,museen)
% 58.37/58.53        & cnt(Db,read,museum_api)
% 58.37/58.53        & part_of(Db,RhoI) ) ).
% 58.37/58.53  
% 58.37/58.53  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.37/58.53  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.37/58.53  % Proof found
% 58.37/58.53  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 58.37/58.53  % SZS output start Proof
% 58.37/58.53  %ClaNum:23(EqnAxiom:0)
% 58.37/58.53  %VarNum:188(SingletonVarNum:56)
% 58.37/58.53  %MaxLitNum:8
% 58.37/58.53  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 58.37/58.53  %SharedTerms:19
% 58.37/58.53  %goalClause: 14
% 58.37/58.53  [1]P1(a1)
% 58.37/58.53  [2]P15(a1)
% 58.37/58.53  [3]P2(a2)
% 58.37/58.53  [4]P2(a3)
% 58.37/58.53  [5]P3(a9)
% 58.37/58.53  [6]P17(a8)
% 58.37/58.53  [7]P16(a1)
% 58.37/58.53  [8]P8(a4)
% 58.37/58.53  [9]P5(a1,a2)
% 58.37/58.53  [10]P7(a1,a3)
% 58.37/58.53  [11]P4(a1,a9)
% 58.37/58.53  [12]P18(a1,a8)
% 58.37/58.53  [13]P6(a4,a1)
% 58.37/58.53  [14]~P9(x141)+~P12(x141,x142)+~P10(x141,a3)+~P11(x141,a9,a8)+~P13(a4,x142,a1)
% 58.37/58.53  [15]~P1(x151)+~P15(x151)+~P5(x151,x152)+~P7(x151,x153)+~P4(x151,x154)+~P18(x151,x155)+~P6(x156,x151)+P14(f5(x151,x152,x153,x154,x155,x156))
% 58.37/58.53  [16]~P1(x161)+~P15(x161)+~P5(x161,x162)+~P7(x161,x163)+~P4(x161,x164)+~P18(x161,x165)+~P6(x166,x161)+P9(f7(x161,x162,x163,x164,x165,x166))
% 58.37/58.53  [17]~P1(x171)+~P15(x171)+~P5(x171,x172)+~P7(x171,x173)+~P4(x171,x174)+~P18(x171,x175)+~P6(x176,x171)+P10(f5(x171,x172,x173,x174,x175,x176),x172)
% 58.37/58.53  [18]~P1(x181)+~P15(x181)+~P5(x181,x182)+~P7(x181,x183)+~P4(x181,x184)+~P18(x181,x185)+~P6(x186,x181)+P10(f7(x181,x182,x183,x184,x185,x186),x183)
% 58.37/58.53  [19]~P1(x192)+~P15(x192)+~P5(x192,x193)+~P7(x192,x194)+~P4(x192,x195)+~P18(x192,x196)+~P6(x191,x192)+P13(x191,f6(x192,x193,x194,x195,x196,x191),x192)
% 58.37/58.53  [20]~P1(x201)+~P15(x201)+~P5(x201,x202)+~P7(x201,x203)+~P4(x201,x204)+~P18(x201,x205)+~P6(x206,x201)+P11(f5(x201,x202,x203,x204,x205,x206),x204,x205)
% 58.37/58.53  [21]~P1(x211)+~P15(x211)+~P5(x211,x212)+~P7(x211,x213)+~P4(x211,x214)+~P18(x211,x215)+~P6(x216,x211)+P11(f7(x211,x212,x213,x214,x215,x216),x214,x215)
% 58.37/58.53  [22]~P1(x221)+~P15(x221)+~P5(x221,x222)+~P7(x221,x223)+~P4(x221,x224)+~P18(x221,x225)+~P6(x226,x221)+P12(f5(x221,x222,x223,x224,x225,x226),f6(x221,x222,x223,x224,x225,x226))
% 58.37/58.53  [23]~P1(x231)+~P15(x231)+~P5(x231,x232)+~P7(x231,x233)+~P4(x231,x234)+~P18(x231,x235)+~P6(x236,x231)+P12(f7(x231,x232,x233,x234,x235,x236),f6(x231,x232,x233,x234,x235,x236))
% 58.37/58.53  %EqnAxiom
% 58.37/58.53  
% 58.37/58.53  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.37/58.53  cnf(40,plain,
% 58.37/58.53     ($false),
% 58.37/58.53     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,9,10,11,12,13,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,14]),
% 58.37/58.53     ['proof']).
% 58.37/58.53  % SZS output end Proof
% 58.37/58.53  % Total time :58.009935s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------