↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : MSC002-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 11:52:10 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 58.60s 58.85s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 58.91s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : MSC002-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Sat Jun 22 05:39:38 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.55/0.60  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 58.60/58.83  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.60/58.83  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 58.60/58.83  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 58.60/58.83  % Transform   :cnf
% 58.60/58.83  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 58.60/58.83  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 58.60/58.83  
% 58.60/58.83  % Result      :Theorem 58.000000s
% 58.60/58.83  % Output      :CNFRefutation 58.000000s
% 58.60/58.83  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.60/58.84  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.60/58.84  % File     : MSC002-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 58.60/58.84  % Domain   : Miscellaneous
% 58.60/58.84  % Problem  : A Blind Hand Problem
% 58.60/58.84  % Version  : Especial.
% 58.60/58.84  %            Theorem formulation : Without hand movement.
% 58.60/58.84  % English  :
% 58.60/58.84  
% 58.60/58.84  % Refs     : [Pop70] Popplestone (1970), Freddy, Things and Sets
% 58.60/58.84  %          : [MRS72] Michie et al. (1972), G-deduction
% 58.60/58.84  % Source   : [TPTP]
% 58.60/58.84  % Names    :
% 58.60/58.84  
% 58.60/58.84  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 58.60/58.84  % Rating   : 0.00 v7.1.0, 0.17 v7.0.0, 0.12 v6.3.0, 0.14 v6.2.0, 0.11 v6.1.0, 0.14 v5.5.0, 0.12 v5.4.0, 0.10 v5.1.0, 0.09 v5.0.0, 0.00 v2.0.0
% 58.60/58.84  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (   3 unt;   1 nHn;   8 RR)
% 58.60/58.84  %            Number of literals    :   20 (   0 equ;  11 neg)
% 58.60/58.84  %            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   2 avg)
% 58.60/58.84  %            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
% 58.60/58.84  %            Number of predicates  :    6 (   6 usr;   0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 58.60/58.84  %            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
% 58.60/58.84  %            Number of variables   :   24 (   6 sgn)
% 58.60/58.84  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN
% 58.60/58.84  
% 58.60/58.84  % Comments : Clauses about hand movement have been removed.
% 58.60/58.84  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.60/58.84  cnf(something_is_here_now,axiom,
% 58.60/58.84      at(something,here,now) ).
% 58.60/58.84  
% 58.60/58.84  cnf(cant_hold_and_let_go,axiom,
% 58.60/58.84      ~ held(Thing,let_go(Situation)) ).
% 58.60/58.84  
% 58.60/58.84  cnf(everything_is_red,axiom,
% 58.60/58.84      ( ~ at(Thing,here,Situation)
% 58.60/58.84      | red(Thing) ) ).
% 58.60/58.84  
% 58.60/58.84  cnf(situation_let_go,axiom,
% 58.60/58.84      ( ~ at(Thing,Place,Situation)
% 58.60/58.84      | at(Thing,Place,let_go(Situation)) ) ).
% 58.60/58.84  
% 58.60/58.84  cnf(situation_pick_up,axiom,
% 58.60/58.84      ( ~ at(Thing,Place,Situation)
% 58.60/58.84      | at(Thing,Place,pick_up(Situation)) ) ).
% 58.60/58.84  
% 58.60/58.84  cnf(can_grab_if_previously_let_go,axiom,
% 58.60/58.84      ( ~ at(Thing,Place,Situation)
% 58.60/58.84      | grabbed(Thing,pick_up(go(Place,let_go(Situation)))) ) ).
% 58.60/58.84  
% 58.60/58.84  cnf(answer_if_red_and_put_there,axiom,
% 58.60/58.84      ( ~ red(Thing)
% 58.60/58.84      | ~ put(Thing,there,Situation)
% 58.60/58.84      | answer(Situation) ) ).
% 58.60/58.84  
% 58.60/58.84  cnf(can_put_somewhere_if_grab_and_go_there,axiom,
% 58.60/58.84      ( ~ at(Thing,Place,Situation)
% 58.60/58.84      | ~ grabbed(Thing,Situation)
% 58.60/58.84      | put(Thing,Another_place,go(Another_place,Situation)) ) ).
% 58.60/58.84  
% 58.60/58.84  cnf(thing_either_held_or_went_there,axiom,
% 58.60/58.85      ( held(Thing,Situation)
% 58.60/58.85      | ~ at(Thing,Place,Situation)
% 58.60/58.85      | at(Thing,Place,go(Another_place,Situation)) ) ).
% 58.60/58.85  
% 58.60/58.85  cnf(prove_there_is_an_answer_situation,negated_conjecture,
% 58.60/58.85      ~ answer(Situation) ).
% 58.60/58.85  
% 58.60/58.85  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.60/58.85  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.60/58.85  % Proof found
% 58.60/58.85  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 58.60/58.85  % SZS output start Proof
% 58.60/58.85  %ClaNum:10(EqnAxiom:0)
% 58.60/58.85  %VarNum:46(SingletonVarNum:24)
% 58.60/58.85  %MaxLitNum:3
% 58.60/58.85  %MaxfuncDepth:3
% 58.60/58.85  %SharedTerms:5
% 58.60/58.85  %goalClause: 2
% 58.60/58.85  %singleGoalClaCount:1
% 58.60/58.85  [1]P1(a1,a2,a4)
% 58.60/58.85  [2]~P2(x21)
% 58.60/58.85  [3]~P3(x31,f5(x32))
% 58.60/58.85  [4]P5(x41)+~P1(x41,a2,x42)
% 58.60/58.85  [6]~P1(x61,x62,x63)+P1(x61,x62,f5(x63))
% 58.60/58.85  [7]~P1(x71,x72,x73)+P1(x71,x72,f6(x73))
% 58.60/58.85  [9]~P1(x91,x92,x93)+P4(x91,f6(f3(x92,f5(x93))))
% 58.60/58.85  [5]P2(x51)+~P5(x52)+~P6(x52,a7,x51)
% 58.60/58.86  [8]~P1(x81,x83,x82)+P3(x81,x82)+P1(x81,x83,f3(x84,x82))
% 58.60/58.86  [10]~P4(x101,x103)+~P1(x101,x104,x103)+P6(x101,x102,f3(x102,x103))
% 58.60/58.86  %EqnAxiom
% 58.60/58.86  
% 58.60/58.86  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.80/59.01  cnf(13,plain,
% 58.80/59.01     (P1(a1,a2,f5(f6(a4)))),
% 58.80/59.01     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,6,7])).
% 58.80/59.01  cnf(15,plain,
% 58.80/59.01     (~P6(a1,a7,x151)),
% 58.80/59.01     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,1,5,4])).
% 58.80/59.01  cnf(19,plain,
% 58.80/59.01     (P1(a1,a2,f3(x191,f5(a4)))),
% 58.80/59.01     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,1,8,6])).
% 58.80/59.01  cnf(269732,plain,
% 58.80/59.01     (~P1(a1,x2697321,f6(f3(a2,f5(a4))))),
% 58.80/59.01     inference(scs_inference,[],[3,13,15,1,6,7,9,8,10])).
% 58.80/59.01  cnf(269770,plain,
% 58.80/59.01     ($false),
% 58.80/59.01     inference(scs_inference,[],[269732,19,6,7]),
% 58.80/59.01     ['proof']).
% 58.91/59.13  % SZS output end Proof
% 58.91/59.13  % Total time :58.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------