↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : MSC002-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:28:26 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.11s 0.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   38 (  11 unt;   3 nHn;  26 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   77 (   0 equ;  43 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   95 (  24 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(can_put_somewhere_if_grab_and_go_there,axiom,
    ( ~ grabbed(X1,X3)
    | ~ at(X1,X2,X3)
    | put(X1,X4,go(X4,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',can_put_somewhere_if_grab_and_go_there) ).

cnf(situation_pick_up,axiom,
    ( ~ at(X1,X2,X3)
    | at(X1,X2,pick_up(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',situation_pick_up) ).

cnf(can_grab_if_previously_let_go,axiom,
    ( ~ at(X1,X2,X3)
    | grabbed(X1,pick_up(go(X2,let_go(X3)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',can_grab_if_previously_let_go) ).

cnf(thing_either_held_or_went_there,axiom,
    ( ~ at(X1,X3,X2)
    | at(X1,X3,go(X4,X2))
    | held(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thing_either_held_or_went_there) ).

cnf(situation_let_go,axiom,
    ( ~ at(X1,X2,X3)
    | at(X1,X2,let_go(X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',situation_let_go) ).

cnf(cant_hold_and_let_go,axiom,
    ~ held(X1,let_go(X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cant_hold_and_let_go) ).

cnf(answer_if_red_and_put_there,axiom,
    ( ~ put(X1,there,X2)
    | ~ red(X1)
    | answer(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',answer_if_red_and_put_there) ).

cnf(prove_there_is_an_answer_situation,negated_conjecture,
    ~ answer(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_there_is_an_answer_situation) ).

cnf(something_is_here_now,axiom,
    at(something,here,now),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',something_is_here_now) ).

cnf(everything_is_red,axiom,
    ( ~ at(X1,here,X2)
    | red(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',everything_is_red) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ grabbed(X1,X3)
    | ~ at(X1,X2,X3)
    | put(X1,X4,go(X4,X3)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[can_put_somewhere_if_grab_and_go_there]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ at(X1,X2,X3)
    | at(X1,X2,pick_up(X3)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[situation_pick_up]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ grabbed(X1,X3)
    | ~ at(X1,X2,X3)
    | put(X1,X4,go(X4,X3)) ),
    c_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ at(X1,X2,X3)
    | at(X1,X2,pick_up(X3)) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ at(X1,X2,X3)
    | grabbed(X1,pick_up(go(X2,let_go(X3)))) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[can_grab_if_previously_let_go]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ at(X1,X3,X2)
    | at(X1,X3,go(X4,X2))
    | held(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[thing_either_held_or_went_there]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ at(X1,X2,X3)
    | at(X1,X2,let_go(X3)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[situation_let_go]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ~ held(X1,let_go(X2)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[cant_hold_and_let_go]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ at(X1,X4,X3)
    | ~ grabbed(X1,pick_up(X3))
    | put(X1,X2,go(X2,pick_up(X3))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ at(X1,X2,X3)
    | grabbed(X1,pick_up(go(X2,let_go(X3)))) ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ at(X1,X3,X2)
    | at(X1,X3,go(X4,X2))
    | held(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ at(X1,X2,X3)
    | at(X1,X2,let_go(X3)) ),
    c_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ~ held(X1,let_go(X2)),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ at(X1,X3,X4)
    | ~ at(X1,X5,go(X3,let_go(X4)))
    | put(X1,X2,go(X2,pick_up(go(X3,let_go(X4))))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ at(X1,X2,X4)
    | at(X1,X2,go(X3,let_go(X4))) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ put(X1,there,X2)
    | ~ red(X1)
    | answer(X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[answer_if_red_and_put_there]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ~ answer(X1),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_there_is_an_answer_situation]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ at(X1,X5,X4)
    | ~ at(X1,X3,X4)
    | put(X1,X2,go(X2,pick_up(go(X3,let_go(X4))))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,axiom,
    at(something,here,now),
    something_is_here_now ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ at(X1,here,X2)
    | red(X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[everything_is_red]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ put(X1,there,X2)
    | ~ red(X1)
    | answer(X2) ),
    c_0_25 ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ~ answer(X1),
    c_0_26 ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( ~ at(something,X2,now)
    | put(something,X1,go(X1,pick_up(go(here,let_go(now))))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ at(X1,here,X2)
    | red(X1) ),
    c_0_29 ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ red(X1)
    | ~ put(X1,there,X2) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    put(something,X1,go(X1,pick_up(go(here,let_go(now))))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    red(something),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MSC002-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.38  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:27:21 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.43  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.45  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1401972 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.11/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.45  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.45  % Search class: FGUNF-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1401977 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.11/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.11/0.45  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.11/0.45  % Search class: FGUNF-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.45  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.11/0.45  
% 0.11/0.45  % Proof found!
% 0.11/0.45  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.11/0.45  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.45  % Parsed axioms                        : 10
% 0.11/0.45  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Initial clauses                      : 10
% 0.11/0.45  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 10
% 0.11/0.45  % Processed clauses                    : 45
% 0.11/0.45  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % ...subsumed                          : 3
% 0.11/0.45  % ...remaining for further processing  : 42
% 0.11/0.45  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.11/0.45  % Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.11/0.45  % Generated clauses                    : 78
% 0.11/0.45  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 72
% 0.11/0.45  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Paramodulations                      : 78
% 0.11/0.45  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Total rewrite steps                  : 8
% 0.11/0.45  % ...of those cached                   : 6
% 0.11/0.45  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45  % Current number of processed clauses  : 30
% 0.11/0.45  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 0.11/0.45  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.11/0.45  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 24
% 0.11/0.45  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 47
% 0.11/0.45  % ...number of literals in the above   : 147
% 0.11/0.45  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Current number of archived clauses   : 12
% 0.11/0.45  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 81
% 0.11/0.45  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 69
% 0.11/0.45  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 3
% 0.11/0.45  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12
% 0.11/0.45  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.11/0.45  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.11/0.45  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1827
% 0.11/0.45  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 24
% 0.11/0.45  
% 0.11/0.45  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.45  % User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.11/0.45  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.11/0.45  % Total time               : 0.008 s
% 0.11/0.45  % Maximum resident set size: 3588 pages
% 0.11/0.45  
% 0.11/0.45  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.45  % User time                : 0.023 s
% 0.11/0.45  % System time              : 0.012 s
% 0.11/0.45  % Total time               : 0.035 s
% 0.11/0.45  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.11/0.45  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------