↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : MSC006-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:03:10 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.24s 1.36s
% Output   : Refutation 2.53s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   13 (   5 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   25 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   74 (  14   ~;  12   |;   0   &;  48   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (   0   ^;  20   !;   0   ?;  20   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(q_decl,type,
    q: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(c_decl,type,
    c: $i ).

thf(d_decl,type,
    d: $i ).

thf(p_decl,type,
    p: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(a_decl,type,
    a: $i ).

thf(b_decl,type,
    b: $i ).

thf(2,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( A @ p ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ p ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ p ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p_transitivity) ).

thf(9,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( A @ p ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ p ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ p ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( B @ q ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ q ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',q_symmetry) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( B @ q ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ q ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ~ ( b @ ( a @ p ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p_is_not_total) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ~ ( b @ ( a @ p ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( d @ ( c @ q ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_q_is_total) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ~ ( d @ ( c @ q ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( A @ q ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ q ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ q ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',q_transitivity) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( A @ q ) )
      | ~ ( C @ ( B @ q ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ q ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ q ) )
      | ( B @ ( A @ p ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',all_related) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ q ) )
      | ( B @ ( A @ p ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(19,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[9,13,17,7,11,15]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MSC006-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.14/0.40  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.14/0.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.14/0.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.40  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 00:14:44 UTC 2026
% 0.14/0.40  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.40  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.72/0.70  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 0.72/0.78  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (86ms). 
% 0.72/0.79  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.16/0.97  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.16/0.98  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 1.16/1.01  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 5 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 1.46/1.03  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 5 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 1.46/1.03  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 1.46/1.03  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 1.46/1.04  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 2.24/1.36  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 2.24/1.36  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 2.24/1.36  % Time passed: 872ms (effective reasoning time: 568ms)
% 2.24/1.36  % Axioms used in derivation (5): q_symmetry, p_transitivity, p_is_not_total, all_related, q_transitivity
% 2.24/1.36  % No. of inferences in proof: 13
% 2.24/1.36  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 872 ms resp. 568 ms w/o parsing
% 2.53/1.40  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.53/1.40  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------