%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Duper---1.0 % Problem : MSC011+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : duper %s % Computer : n008.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Fri Oct 3 07:55:23 PM UTC 2025 % Result : Theorem 4.76s 4.93s % Output : Proof 4.76s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.12/0.13 % Problem : MSC011+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.12/0.14 % Command : duper %s % 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu % 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Oct 2 16:57:53 EDT 2025 % 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime : % 4.76/4.93 SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p % 4.76/4.93 SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p % 4.76/4.93 Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (A : Iota), And (drunk A) (not_drunk A) → goal) True % 4.76/4.93 Clause #1 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (A : Iota), And (drunk A) neg_psi) True % 4.76/4.93 Clause #2 (by assumption #[]): Eq (neg_psi → Exists fun A => not_drunk A) True % 4.76/4.93 Clause #3 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not goal) True % 4.76/4.93 Clause #4 (by clausification #[3]): Eq goal False % 4.76/4.93 Clause #5 (by clausification #[0]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (And (drunk a) (not_drunk a) → goal) True % 4.76/4.93 Clause #6 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (And (drunk a) (not_drunk a)) False) (Eq goal True) % 4.76/4.93 Clause #7 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq goal True) (Or (Eq (drunk a) False) (Eq (not_drunk a) False)) % 4.76/4.93 Clause #8 (by forward demodulation #[7, 4]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq False True) (Or (Eq (drunk a) False) (Eq (not_drunk a) False)) % 4.76/4.93 Clause #9 (by clausification #[8]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (drunk a) False) (Eq (not_drunk a) False) % 4.76/4.93 Clause #10 (by clausification #[1]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (And (drunk a) neg_psi) True % 4.76/4.93 Clause #11 (by clausification #[10]): Eq neg_psi True % 4.76/4.93 Clause #12 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (drunk a) True % 4.76/4.93 Clause #13 (by superposition #[12, 9]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq True False) (Eq (not_drunk a) False) % 4.76/4.93 Clause #14 (by clausification #[13]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (not_drunk a) False % 4.76/4.93 Clause #16 (by betaEtaReduce #[2]): Eq (neg_psi → Exists not_drunk) True % 4.76/4.93 Clause #17 (by clausification #[16]): Or (Eq neg_psi False) (Eq (Exists not_drunk) True) % 4.76/4.93 Clause #18 (by clausification #[17]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq neg_psi False) (Eq (not_drunk (skS.0 0 a)) True) % 4.76/4.93 Clause #19 (by forward demodulation #[18, 11]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq True False) (Eq (not_drunk (skS.0 0 a)) True) % 4.76/4.93 Clause #20 (by clausification #[19]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (not_drunk (skS.0 0 a)) True % 4.76/4.93 Clause #21 (by superposition #[20, 14]): Eq True False % 4.76/4.93 Clause #22 (by clausification #[21]): False % 4.76/4.93 SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p %------------------------------------------------------------------------------