%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : MSC012+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n015.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:43:16 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.12s 0.35s % Output : CNFRefutation 0.12s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.06/0.12 % Problem : MSC012+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0. % 0.06/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jul 1 16:54:13 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 0.12/0.35 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.12/0.35 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN % 0.12/0.35 # and selection function PSelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn. % 0.12/0.35 # % 0.12/0.35 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.12/0.35 # Number of axioms: 6 Number of unprocessed: 6 % 0.12/0.35 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.12/0.35 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.12/0.35 # Hello from C++ % 0.12/0.35 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.12/0.35 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.12/0.35 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.12/0.35 # 6 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.12/0.35 # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures. % 0.12/0.35 # There are 1 start rule candidates: % 0.12/0.35 # Found 2 unit axioms. % 0.12/0.35 # 1 start rule tableaux created. % 0.12/0.35 # 4 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.12/0.35 # 2 unit axiom clauses % 0.12/0.35 % 0.12/0.35 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 0.12/0.35 # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1 % 0.12/0.35 # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses % 0.12/0.35 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 0.12/0.35 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 0.12/0.35 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 0.12/0.35 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 0.12/0.35 # There were 1 total successful branch saturations. % 0.12/0.35 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 0.12/0.35 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 0.12/0.35 # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 0.12/0.35 # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.35 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.12/0.35 # Begin clausification derivation % 0.12/0.35 % 0.12/0.35 # End clausification derivation % 0.12/0.35 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 0.12/0.35 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (less(X1,esk2_1(X1)))). % 0.12/0.35 cnf(i_0_6, negated_conjecture, (~goal)). % 0.12/0.35 cnf(i_0_2, plain, (p(esk1_1(X1))|p(X1))). % 0.12/0.35 cnf(i_0_1, plain, (~less(X1,X2)|~p(X2)|~p(X1))). % 0.12/0.35 cnf(i_0_3, plain, (less(X1,esk1_1(X1))|p(X1))). % 0.12/0.35 cnf(i_0_4, plain, (less(X1,X2)|~less(X3,X2)|~less(X1,X3))). % 0.12/0.35 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 0.12/0.35 # Begin printing tableau % 0.12/0.35 # Found 6 steps % 0.12/0.35 cnf(i_0_5, plain, (less(X5,esk2_1(X5))), inference(start_rule)). % 0.12/0.35 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (less(X5,esk2_1(X5))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_4])). % 0.12/0.35 cnf(i_0_38, plain, (~less(esk2_1(X5),esk2_1(esk2_1(X5)))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_5])). % 0.12/0.35 cnf(i_0_37, plain, (less(X5,esk2_1(esk2_1(X5)))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_4])). % 0.12/0.35 cnf(i_0_48, plain, (~less(esk2_1(esk2_1(X5)),esk2_1(esk2_1(esk2_1(X5))))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_5])). % 0.12/0.35 cnf(i_0_47, plain, (less(X5,esk2_1(esk2_1(esk2_1(X5))))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_47, ...])). % 0.12/0.35 # End printing tableau % 0.12/0.35 # SZS output end % 0.12/0.35 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 0.12/0.35 # Returning from population with 8 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux. % 0.12/0.35 # We now have 8 tableaux to operate on % 0.12/0.35 # Found closed tableau during pool population. % 0.12/0.35 # Proof search is over... % 0.12/0.35 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------