%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : MSC013+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:28:38 PM UTC 2026
% Result : CounterSatisfiable 0.14s 5.43s
% Output : Saturation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_8ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_22ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ f(X2,X8,X9,X10,X11,X7)
| ~ f(X1,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7)
| equalish(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ equalish(X5,X5)
| ~ equalish(X4,X4)
| ~ equalish(X3,X3)
| ~ equalish(X2,X2)
| ~ equalish(X1,X1)
| f(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,esk1_5(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ f(X8,X2,X9,X10,X11,X7)
| ~ f(X3,X1,X4,X5,X6,X7)
| equalish(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ f(X8,X9,X2,X10,X11,X7)
| ~ f(X3,X4,X1,X5,X6,X7)
| equalish(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ f(X8,X9,X10,X2,X11,X7)
| ~ f(X3,X4,X5,X1,X6,X7)
| equalish(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ f(X8,X9,X10,X11,X2,X7)
| ~ f(X3,X4,X5,X6,X1,X7)
| equalish(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ goal,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ equalish(X2,X2)
| ~ equalish(X7,X7)
| ~ equalish(X8,X8)
| ~ equalish(X9,X9)
| ~ equalish(X10,X10)
| ~ f(X1,X3,X4,X5,X6,esk1_5(X2,X7,X8,X9,X10))
| equalish(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ equalish(X7,X7)
| ~ equalish(X2,X2)
| ~ equalish(X8,X8)
| ~ equalish(X9,X9)
| ~ equalish(X10,X10)
| ~ f(X3,X1,X4,X5,X6,esk1_5(X7,X2,X8,X9,X10))
| equalish(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_14]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ equalish(X7,X7)
| ~ equalish(X8,X8)
| ~ equalish(X2,X2)
| ~ equalish(X9,X9)
| ~ equalish(X10,X10)
| ~ f(X3,X4,X1,X5,X6,esk1_5(X7,X8,X2,X9,X10))
| equalish(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_14]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ equalish(X7,X7)
| ~ equalish(X8,X8)
| ~ equalish(X9,X9)
| ~ equalish(X2,X2)
| ~ equalish(X10,X10)
| ~ f(X3,X4,X5,X1,X6,esk1_5(X7,X8,X9,X2,X10))
| equalish(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_14]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
( ~ equalish(X7,X7)
| ~ equalish(X8,X8)
| ~ equalish(X9,X9)
| ~ equalish(X10,X10)
| ~ equalish(X2,X2)
| ~ f(X3,X4,X5,X6,X1,esk1_5(X7,X8,X9,X10,X2))
| equalish(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_14]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
~ equalish(n1,n0),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
~ equalish(n0,n1),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_20]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
equalish(n1,n1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[n0_and_n1_reflexive]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
equalish(n0,n0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[n0_and_n1_reflexive]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : MSC013+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/5.37 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.08/5.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/5.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/5.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/5.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/5.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/5.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/5.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:28:15 UTC 2026
% 0.08/5.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/5.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/5.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/5.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/5.43 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/5.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/5.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/5.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/5.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.43 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.43 % sh5l with pid 4056002 completed with status 1
% 0.14/5.43 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.14/5.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/5.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/5.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/5.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.43 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.43 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.14/5.43 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.14/5.43 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/5.43 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/5.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.43 % SubtermCWHack with pid 4056009 completed with status 1
% 0.14/5.43 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/5.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/5.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/5.43 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/5.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.43 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.43 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.14/5.43 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.14/5.43 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/5.43 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/5.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/5.43 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/5.43
% 0.14/5.43 % No proof found!
% 0.14/5.43 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable
% 0.14/5.43 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.14/5.43 % Parsed axioms : 6
% 0.14/5.43 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.14/5.43 % Initial clauses : 11
% 0.14/5.43 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.14/5.43 % Initial clauses in saturation : 11
% 0.14/5.43 % Processed clauses : 16
% 0.14/5.43 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.14/5.43 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.14/5.43 % ...remaining for further processing : 16
% 0.14/5.43 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/5.43 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/5.43 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.14/5.43 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.14/5.43 % Generated clauses : 10
% 0.14/5.43 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5
% 0.14/5.43 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/5.43 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.14/5.43 % Paramodulations : 10
% 0.14/5.43 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/5.43 % NegExts : 0
% 0.14/5.43 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.14/5.43 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/5.43 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.14/5.43 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.14/5.43 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/5.43 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/5.43 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/5.43 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/5.43 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/5.43 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/5.43 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/5.43 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/5.43 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/5.43 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/5.43 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/5.43 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/5.43 % Current number of processed clauses : 16
% 0.14/5.43 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.14/5.43 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/5.43 % Negative unit clauses : 3
% 0.14/5.43 % Non-unit-clauses : 11
% 0.14/5.43 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.14/5.43 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.14/5.43 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/5.43 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.14/5.43 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 45
% 0.14/5.43 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 40
% 0.14/5.43 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.14/5.43 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.14/5.43 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/5.43 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.14/5.43 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.14/5.43 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/5.43 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/5.43 % Termbank termtop insertions : 967
% 0.14/5.43 % Search garbage collected termcells : 121
% 0.14/5.43
% 0.14/5.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/5.43 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.14/5.43 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.14/5.43 % Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.14/5.43 % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.14/5.43
% 0.14/5.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/5.43 % User time : 0.006 s
% 0.14/5.43 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.14/5.43 % Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.14/5.43 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.14/5.43 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------