%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.52
% Problem : MSC014+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Apr 9 07:45:09 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Satisfiable 2.88s 1.77s
% Output : Assurance 0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : MSC014+1 : TPTP v9.0.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Apr 8 07:57:14 EDT 2025
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 2.88/1.77
% 2.88/1.77 % SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.88/1.77
% 2.88/1.77 % SZS output start Saturation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.90/1.78 %$ f > equalish > #nlpp > n1 > n0 > #skF_1
% 2.90/1.78
% 2.90/1.78 %Foreground sorts:
% 2.90/1.78
% 2.90/1.78
% 2.90/1.78 %Background operators:
% 2.90/1.78
% 2.90/1.78
% 2.90/1.78 %Foreground operators:
% 2.90/1.78 tff(n1, type, n1: $i).
% 2.90/1.78 tff(n0, type, n0: $i).
% 2.90/1.78 tff(f, type, f: ($i * $i * $i * $i * $i) > $o).
% 2.90/1.78 tff(equalish, type, equalish: ($i * $i) > $o).
% 2.90/1.78 tff('#skF_1', type, '#skF_1': ($i * $i * $i * $i) > $i).
% 2.90/1.78
% 2.90/1.78 %Saturated clause set:
% 2.90/1.79 tff(c_34, plain, (![X2_7, X3_53, X4_54, X3_8, X4_9, X1_51, X2_52, X1_6]: (equalish(X4_9, X4_54) | ~f(X1_6, X2_7, X3_8, X4_9, '#skF_1'(X1_51, X2_52, X3_53, X4_54)) | ~equalish(X4_54, X4_54) | ~equalish(X3_53, X3_53) | ~equalish(X2_52, X2_52) | ~equalish(X1_51, X1_51)))).
% 2.90/1.79 tff(c_35, plain, (![X2_7, X3_53, X4_54, X3_8, X4_9, X1_51, X2_52, X1_6]: (equalish(X3_8, X3_53) | ~f(X1_6, X2_7, X3_8, X4_9, '#skF_1'(X1_51, X2_52, X3_53, X4_54)) | ~equalish(X4_54, X4_54) | ~equalish(X3_53, X3_53) | ~equalish(X2_52, X2_52) | ~equalish(X1_51, X1_51)))).
% 2.90/1.79 tff(c_33, plain, (![X2_7, X3_53, X4_54, X3_8, X4_9, X1_51, X2_52, X1_6]: (equalish(X1_6, X1_51) | ~f(X1_6, X2_7, X3_8, X4_9, '#skF_1'(X1_51, X2_52, X3_53, X4_54)) | ~equalish(X4_54, X4_54) | ~equalish(X3_53, X3_53) | ~equalish(X2_52, X2_52) | ~equalish(X1_51, X1_51)))).
% 2.90/1.79 tff(c_32, plain, (![X2_7, X3_53, X4_54, X3_8, X4_9, X1_51, X2_52, X1_6]: (equalish(X2_7, X2_52) | ~f(X1_6, X2_7, X3_8, X4_9, '#skF_1'(X1_51, X2_52, X3_53, X4_54)) | ~equalish(X4_54, X4_54) | ~equalish(X3_53, X3_53) | ~equalish(X2_52, X2_52) | ~equalish(X1_51, X1_51)))).
% 2.90/1.79 tff(c_10, plain, (![X1_1, X2_2, X3_3, X4_4]: (f(X1_1, X2_2, X3_3, X4_4, '#skF_1'(X1_1, X2_2, X3_3, X4_4)) | ~equalish(X4_4, X4_4) | ~equalish(X3_3, X3_3) | ~equalish(X2_2, X2_2) | ~equalish(X1_1, X1_1)))).
% 2.90/1.79 tff(c_16, plain, (![Y1_10, Y3_12, X2_7, X3_8, Z_14, X4_9, Y4_13, X1_6, Y2_11]: (equalish(X2_7, Y2_11) | ~f(Y1_10, Y2_11, Y3_12, Y4_13, Z_14) | ~f(X1_6, X2_7, X3_8, X4_9, Z_14)))).
% 2.90/1.79 tff(c_18, plain, (![Y1_10, Y3_12, X2_7, X3_8, Z_14, X4_9, Y4_13, X1_6, Y2_11]: (equalish(X1_6, Y1_10) | ~f(Y1_10, Y2_11, Y3_12, Y4_13, Z_14) | ~f(X1_6, X2_7, X3_8, X4_9, Z_14)))).
% 2.90/1.79 tff(c_12, plain, (![Y1_10, Y3_12, X2_7, X3_8, Z_14, X4_9, Y4_13, X1_6, Y2_11]: (equalish(X4_9, Y4_13) | ~f(Y1_10, Y2_11, Y3_12, Y4_13, Z_14) | ~f(X1_6, X2_7, X3_8, X4_9, Z_14)))).
% 2.90/1.79 tff(c_14, plain, (![Y1_10, Y3_12, X2_7, X3_8, Z_14, X4_9, Y4_13, X1_6, Y2_11]: (equalish(X3_8, Y3_12) | ~f(Y1_10, Y2_11, Y3_12, Y4_13, Z_14) | ~f(X1_6, X2_7, X3_8, X4_9, Z_14)))).
% 2.90/1.79 tff(c_6, plain, (~equalish(n1, n0))).
% 2.90/1.79 tff(c_2, plain, (equalish(n1, n1))).
% 2.90/1.79 tff(c_4, plain, (equalish(n0, n0))).
% 2.90/1.79 tff(c_8, plain, (~equalish(n0, n1))).
% 2.90/1.79 % SZS output end Saturation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.90/1.79
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------