%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : MSC014+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:28:39 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.29s 0.52s
% Output : Saturation 0.29s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_4ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_13ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ f(X2,X7,X8,X9,X6)
| ~ f(X1,X3,X4,X5,X6)
| equalish(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ equalish(X4,X4)
| ~ equalish(X3,X3)
| ~ equalish(X2,X2)
| ~ equalish(X1,X1)
| f(X1,X2,X3,X4,esk1_4(X1,X2,X3,X4)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ f(X7,X2,X8,X9,X6)
| ~ f(X3,X1,X4,X5,X6)
| equalish(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ f(X7,X8,X2,X9,X6)
| ~ f(X3,X4,X1,X5,X6)
| equalish(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ f(X7,X8,X9,X2,X6)
| ~ f(X3,X4,X5,X1,X6)
| equalish(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ equalish(X2,X2)
| ~ equalish(X6,X6)
| ~ equalish(X7,X7)
| ~ equalish(X8,X8)
| ~ f(X1,X3,X4,X5,esk1_4(X2,X6,X7,X8))
| equalish(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ equalish(X6,X6)
| ~ equalish(X2,X2)
| ~ equalish(X7,X7)
| ~ equalish(X8,X8)
| ~ f(X3,X1,X4,X5,esk1_4(X6,X2,X7,X8))
| equalish(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ equalish(X6,X6)
| ~ equalish(X7,X7)
| ~ equalish(X2,X2)
| ~ equalish(X8,X8)
| ~ f(X3,X4,X1,X5,esk1_4(X6,X7,X2,X8))
| equalish(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ equalish(X6,X6)
| ~ equalish(X7,X7)
| ~ equalish(X8,X8)
| ~ equalish(X2,X2)
| ~ f(X3,X4,X5,X1,esk1_4(X6,X7,X8,X2))
| equalish(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_8]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
~ equalish(n1,n0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
~ equalish(n0,n1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
equalish(n1,n1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[n0_and_n1_reflexive]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
equalish(n0,n0),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[n0_and_n1_reflexive]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : MSC014+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.43 % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.43 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.43 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.43 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.43 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.43 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.43 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.43 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:27:35 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.43 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.43 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.29/0.52 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.29/0.52 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.29/0.52 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.29/0.52 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.29/0.52 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.52 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.52 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.52 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 2865709 completed with status 1
% 0.29/0.52 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.29/0.52 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.29/0.52 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.29/0.52 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.29/0.52 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.29/0.52 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.29/0.52 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.29/0.52 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.29/0.52 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.52 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.52 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.52 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.52 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.52 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2865713 completed with status 1
% 0.29/0.52 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.29/0.52 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.29/0.52 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.29/0.52 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.29/0.52 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.29/0.52 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.29/0.52 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSF33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.29/0.52 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.29/0.52 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.29/0.52 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.29/0.52
% 0.29/0.52 % No proof found!
% 0.29/0.52 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.29/0.52 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.29/0.52 % Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.29/0.52 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.29/0.52 % Initial clauses : 9
% 0.29/0.52 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.29/0.52 % Initial clauses in saturation : 9
% 0.29/0.52 % Processed clauses : 13
% 0.29/0.52 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.29/0.52 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.29/0.52 % ...remaining for further processing : 13
% 0.29/0.52 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.29/0.52 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.29/0.52 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.29/0.52 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.29/0.52 % Generated clauses : 8
% 0.29/0.52 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4
% 0.29/0.52 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.29/0.52 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.29/0.52 % Paramodulations : 8
% 0.29/0.52 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.29/0.52 % NegExts : 0
% 0.29/0.52 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.29/0.52 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.29/0.52 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.29/0.52 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.29/0.52 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.29/0.52 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.29/0.52 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.29/0.52 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.29/0.52 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.29/0.52 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.29/0.52 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.52 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.52 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.52 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.52 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.52 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.29/0.52 % Current number of processed clauses : 13
% 0.29/0.52 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.29/0.52 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.29/0.52 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.29/0.52 % Non-unit-clauses : 9
% 0.29/0.52 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.29/0.52 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.29/0.52 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.29/0.52 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.29/0.52 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 28
% 0.29/0.52 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 24
% 0.29/0.52 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.29/0.52 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.29/0.52 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.29/0.52 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.29/0.52 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.29/0.52 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.29/0.52 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.29/0.52 % Termbank termtop insertions : 745
% 0.29/0.52 % Search garbage collected termcells : 97
% 0.29/0.52
% 0.29/0.52 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/0.52 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.29/0.52 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.29/0.52 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.29/0.52 % Maximum resident set size: 3604 pages
% 0.29/0.52
% 0.29/0.52 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.29/0.52 % User time : 0.009 s
% 0.29/0.52 % System time : 0.008 s
% 0.29/0.52 % Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.29/0.52 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.29/0.52 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------