↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : MSC015-1.005 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:28:39 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   33
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   51 (  36 unt;   0 nHn;  51 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   66 (   0 equ;  48 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    2 (   2 usr;   2 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   30 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(goal,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s1,s1,s1,s1,s1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goal) ).

cnf(rule1,axiom,
    ( ~ p(X1,X2,X3,X4,s0)
    | p(X1,X2,X3,X4,s1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule1) ).

cnf(rule2,axiom,
    ( ~ p(X1,X2,X3,s0,s1)
    | p(X1,X2,X3,s1,s0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule2) ).

cnf(rule3,axiom,
    ( ~ p(X1,X2,s0,s1,s1)
    | p(X1,X2,s1,s0,s0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule3) ).

cnf(rule4,axiom,
    ( ~ p(X1,s0,s1,s1,s1)
    | p(X1,s1,s0,s0,s0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule4) ).

cnf(rule5,axiom,
    ( ~ p(s0,s1,s1,s1,s1)
    | p(s1,s0,s0,s0,s0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule5) ).

cnf(init,axiom,
    p(s0,s0,s0,s0,s0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',init) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s1,s1,s1,s1,s1),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[goal]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ p(X1,X2,X3,X4,s0)
    | p(X1,X2,X3,X4,s1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule1]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s1,s1,s1,s1,s1),
    c_0_7 ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ p(X1,X2,X3,X4,s0)
    | p(X1,X2,X3,X4,s1) ),
    c_0_8 ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ p(X1,X2,X3,s0,s1)
    | p(X1,X2,X3,s1,s0) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule2]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s1,s1,s1,s1,s0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ p(X1,X2,X3,s0,s1)
    | p(X1,X2,X3,s1,s0) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s1,s1,s1,s0,s1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ p(X1,X2,s0,s1,s1)
    | p(X1,X2,s1,s0,s0) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule3]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s1,s1,s1,s0,s0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ p(X1,X2,s0,s1,s1)
    | p(X1,X2,s1,s0,s0) ),
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s1,s1,s0,s1,s1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s1,s1,s0,s1,s0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s1,s1,s0,s0,s1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ p(X1,s0,s1,s1,s1)
    | p(X1,s1,s0,s0,s0) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule4]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s1,s1,s0,s0,s0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ p(X1,s0,s1,s1,s1)
    | p(X1,s1,s0,s0,s0) ),
    c_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s1,s0,s1,s1,s1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s1,s0,s1,s1,s0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s1,s0,s1,s0,s1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s1,s0,s1,s0,s0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s1,s0,s0,s1,s1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s1,s0,s0,s1,s0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s1,s0,s0,s0,s1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ p(s0,s1,s1,s1,s1)
    | p(s1,s0,s0,s0,s0) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[rule5]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s1,s0,s0,s0,s0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ p(s0,s1,s1,s1,s1)
    | p(s1,s0,s0,s0,s0) ),
    c_0_31 ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s0,s1,s1,s1,s1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s0,s1,s1,s1,s0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s0,s1,s1,s0,s1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s0,s1,s1,s0,s0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s0,s1,s0,s1,s1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s0,s1,s0,s1,s0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s0,s1,s0,s0,s1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s0,s1,s0,s0,s0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s0,s0,s1,s1,s1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s0,s0,s1,s1,s0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s0,s0,s1,s0,s1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s0,s0,s1,s0,s0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s0,s0,s0,s1,s1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s0,s0,s0,s1,s0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(s0,s0,s0,s0,s1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,axiom,
    p(s0,s0,s0,s0,s0),
    init ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_10]),c_0_49])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MSC015-1.005 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:32:23 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.43  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  % new_bool_3 with pid 1286141 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/0.43  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.43  % Search class: FHUNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1286147 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/0.43  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/0.43  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.43  % Search class: FHUNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.43  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.43  
% 0.15/0.43  % Proof found!
% 0.15/0.43  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.43  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.43  % Parsed axioms                        : 7
% 0.15/0.43  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.15/0.43  % Initial clauses                      : 7
% 0.15/0.43  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.15/0.43  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 7
% 0.15/0.43  % Processed clauses                    : 37
% 0.15/0.43  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.15/0.43  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.15/0.43  % ...remaining for further processing  : 37
% 0.15/0.43  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.15/0.43  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.15/0.43  % Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.15/0.43  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.15/0.43  % Generated clauses                    : 31
% 0.15/0.43  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 30
% 0.15/0.43  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.15/0.43  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.15/0.43  % Paramodulations                      : 31
% 0.15/0.43  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.15/0.43  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.15/0.43  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.15/0.43  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.15/0.43  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1
% 0.15/0.43  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.15/0.43  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.15/0.43  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.15/0.43  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.43  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.15/0.43  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.43  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.15/0.43  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  % Current number of processed clauses  : 36
% 0.15/0.43  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 0.15/0.43  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.43  %    Negative unit clauses             : 31
% 0.15/0.43  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 4
% 0.15/0.43  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.43  % ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.15/0.43  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.15/0.43  % Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.15/0.43  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10
% 0.15/0.43  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10
% 0.15/0.43  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.15/0.43  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 115
% 0.15/0.43  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.15/0.43  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.15/0.43  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.15/0.43  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.15/0.43  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.15/0.43  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 321
% 0.15/0.43  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 17
% 0.15/0.43  
% 0.15/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43  % User time                : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.43  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.15/0.43  % Total time               : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.15/0.43  
% 0.15/0.43  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43  % User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.43  % System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.15/0.43  % Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.15/0.43  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.15/0.43  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------