↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : MSC015-1.005 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:03:12 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.49s 3.09s
% Output   : Refutation 4.49s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   5 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   25 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  142 (  12   ~;  10   |;   0   &; 120   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   8 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    4 (   3 usr;   3 con; 0-5 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (   0   ^;  20   !;   0   ?;  20   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(p_decl,type,
    p: $i > $i > $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(s1_decl,type,
    s1: $i ).

thf(s0_decl,type,
    s0: $i ).

thf(2,axiom,
    s0 @ ( s0 @ ( s0 @ ( s0 @ ( s0 @ p ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',init) ).

thf(10,plain,
    s0 @ ( s0 @ ( s0 @ ( s0 @ ( s0 @ p ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( s0 @ ( s1 @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ p ) ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( s1 @ ( s0 @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ p ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule2) ).

thf(13,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( s0 @ ( s1 @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ p ) ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( s1 @ ( s0 @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ p ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( s0 @ ( s0 @ ( s0 @ ( s1 @ ( A @ p ) ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( s1 @ ( s1 @ ( s1 @ ( s0 @ ( A @ p ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule4) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( s0 @ ( s0 @ ( s0 @ ( s1 @ ( A @ p ) ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( s1 @ ( s1 @ ( s1 @ ( s0 @ ( A @ p ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( s1 @ ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ p ) ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( s0 @ ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ p ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule1) ).

thf(11,plain,
    ! [D: $i,C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( s1 @ ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ p ) ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( s0 @ ( D @ ( C @ ( B @ ( A @ p ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( s1 @ ( s1 @ ( s1 @ ( s1 @ ( s1 @ p ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goal) ).

thf(8,plain,
    ~ ( s1 @ ( s1 @ ( s1 @ ( s1 @ ( s1 @ p ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ( ( s0 @ ( s0 @ ( s0 @ ( s0 @ ( s1 @ p ) ) ) ) )
    | ~ ( s1 @ ( s1 @ ( s1 @ ( s1 @ ( s0 @ p ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule5) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ( ( s0 @ ( s0 @ ( s0 @ ( s0 @ ( s1 @ p ) ) ) ) )
    | ~ ( s1 @ ( s1 @ ( s1 @ ( s1 @ ( s0 @ p ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( s0 @ ( s0 @ ( s1 @ ( B @ ( A @ p ) ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( s1 @ ( s1 @ ( s0 @ ( B @ ( A @ p ) ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',rule3) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( s0 @ ( s0 @ ( s1 @ ( B @ ( A @ p ) ) ) ) )
      | ~ ( s1 @ ( s1 @ ( s0 @ ( B @ ( A @ p ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(25,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[10,13,17,11,8,19,15]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : MSC015-1.005 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.5.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.22/0.47  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.22/0.47  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.22/0.47  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.22/0.47  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.22/0.47  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.22/0.47  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.22/0.47  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.22/0.47  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 00:16:22 UTC 2026
% 0.22/0.47  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.47  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.24/1.28  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.72/1.54  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (250ms). 
% 1.72/1.56  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.48/2.12  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.48/2.13  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.76/2.25  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 6 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.76/2.29  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 6 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.90/2.32  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 2.90/2.32  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.90/2.33  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 4.49/3.08  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.49/3.09  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 4.49/3.09  % Time passed: 2419ms (effective reasoning time: 1521ms)
% 4.49/3.09  % Axioms used in derivation (6): rule4, rule5, rule1, rule2, rule3, init
% 4.49/3.09  % No. of inferences in proof: 15
% 4.49/3.09  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2419 ms resp. 1521 ms w/o parsing
% 4.49/3.14  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.49/3.14  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------