%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Princess---230619 % Problem : NLP001+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % Computer : n027.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Thu Aug 31 10:03:13 EDT 2023 % Result : Theorem 4.32s 1.30s % Output : Proof 6.52s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.12 % Problem : NLP001+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0. % 0.00/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu % 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 11:49:17 EDT 2023 % 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.20/0.58 ________ _____ % 0.20/0.58 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________ % 0.20/0.58 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/ % 0.20/0.58 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ ) % 0.20/0.58 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/ % 0.20/0.58 % 0.20/0.58 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic % 0.20/0.58 (2023-06-19) % 0.20/0.58 % 0.20/0.58 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023 % 0.20/0.58 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen, % 0.20/0.58 Amanda Stjerna. % 0.20/0.58 Free software under BSD-3-Clause. % 0.20/0.58 % 0.20/0.59 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml % 0.20/0.59 % 0.20/0.59 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.20/0.60 Running up to 7 provers in parallel. % 0.20/0.62 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423 % 0.20/0.62 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893 % 0.20/0.62 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994 % 0.20/0.62 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996 % 0.20/0.62 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696 % 0.20/0.62 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288 % 0.20/0.62 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365 % 2.13/0.98 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 2.13/0.98 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 2.60/1.01 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 2.60/1.01 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 2.60/1.02 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 2.60/1.02 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 2.60/1.02 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 2.99/1.13 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ... % 2.99/1.13 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ... % 3.91/1.23 Prover 6: Proving ... % 4.21/1.24 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 4.32/1.25 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 4.32/1.30 Prover 5: proved (676ms) % 4.32/1.30 % 4.32/1.30 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 4.32/1.30 % 4.32/1.31 Prover 2: proved (686ms) % 4.32/1.31 % 4.32/1.31 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 4.32/1.31 % 4.32/1.32 Prover 3: stopped % 4.32/1.33 Prover 6: stopped % 4.32/1.33 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470 % 4.32/1.33 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089 % 4.32/1.33 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125 % 4.32/1.33 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984 % 4.32/1.34 Prover 8: Preprocessing ... % 4.32/1.36 Prover 10: Preprocessing ... % 4.32/1.36 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 4.32/1.37 Prover 11: Preprocessing ... % 4.32/1.40 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ... % 4.32/1.41 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ... % 4.98/1.48 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 5.99/1.49 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.99/1.49 Prover 0: stopped % 5.99/1.49 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443 % 5.99/1.50 Prover 10: Found proof (size 9) % 5.99/1.50 Prover 7: Found proof (size 9) % 5.99/1.50 Prover 10: proved (171ms) % 5.99/1.50 Prover 7: proved (184ms) % 5.99/1.50 Prover 8: stopped % 5.99/1.50 Prover 1: stopped % 5.99/1.51 Prover 13: Preprocessing ... % 5.99/1.51 Prover 4: stopped % 5.99/1.53 Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.99/1.53 Prover 13: stopped % 5.99/1.54 Prover 11: stopped % 5.99/1.54 % 5.99/1.54 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 5.99/1.54 % 5.99/1.54 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 5.99/1.54 Assumptions after simplification: % 5.99/1.54 --------------------------------- % 5.99/1.54 % 5.99/1.54 (co1) % 5.99/1.56 ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: $i] : ($i(v3) & $i(v2) & % 5.99/1.56 $i(v1) & $i(v0) & ((in(v1, v0) & down(v1, v3) & barrel(v1, v2) & old(v2) & % 5.99/1.56 dirty(v2) & white(v2) & car(v2) & chevy(v2) & lonely(v3) & way(v3) & % 5.99/1.56 street(v3) & event(v1) & city(v0) & hollywood(v0) & ! [v4: $i] : ! % 5.99/1.56 [v5: $i] : ! [v6: $i] : ! [v7: $i] : ( ~ $i(v7) | ~ $i(v6) | ~ % 5.99/1.56 $i(v5) | ~ $i(v4) | ~ in(v5, v4) | ~ down(v5, v6) | ~ barrel(v5, % 5.99/1.56 v7) | ~ old(v7) | ~ dirty(v7) | ~ white(v7) | ~ car(v7) | ~ % 5.99/1.56 chevy(v7) | ~ lonely(v6) | ~ way(v6) | ~ street(v6) | ~ event(v5) % 5.99/1.56 | ~ city(v4) | ~ hollywood(v4))) | (in(v1, v0) & down(v1, v2) & % 5.99/1.56 barrel(v1, v3) & old(v3) & dirty(v3) & white(v3) & car(v3) & chevy(v3) & % 5.99/1.56 lonely(v2) & way(v2) & street(v2) & event(v1) & city(v0) & hollywood(v0) % 5.99/1.56 & ! [v4: $i] : ! [v5: $i] : ! [v6: $i] : ! [v7: $i] : ( ~ $i(v7) | % 5.99/1.56 ~ $i(v6) | ~ $i(v5) | ~ $i(v4) | ~ in(v5, v4) | ~ down(v5, v7) | % 5.99/1.56 ~ barrel(v5, v6) | ~ old(v6) | ~ dirty(v6) | ~ white(v6) | ~ % 5.99/1.56 car(v6) | ~ chevy(v6) | ~ lonely(v7) | ~ way(v7) | ~ street(v7) | % 5.99/1.56 ~ event(v5) | ~ city(v4) | ~ hollywood(v4))))) % 5.99/1.56 % 5.99/1.56 Those formulas are unsatisfiable: % 5.99/1.56 --------------------------------- % 5.99/1.56 % 5.99/1.56 Begin of proof % 5.99/1.56 | % 5.99/1.56 | DELTA: instantiating (co1) with fresh symbols all_2_0, all_2_1, all_2_2, % 5.99/1.56 | all_2_3 gives: % 5.99/1.56 | (1) $i(all_2_0) & $i(all_2_1) & $i(all_2_2) & $i(all_2_3) & ((in(all_2_2, % 5.99/1.56 | all_2_3) & down(all_2_2, all_2_0) & barrel(all_2_2, all_2_1) & % 5.99/1.56 | old(all_2_1) & dirty(all_2_1) & white(all_2_1) & car(all_2_1) & % 5.99/1.56 | chevy(all_2_1) & lonely(all_2_0) & way(all_2_0) & street(all_2_0) & % 5.99/1.56 | event(all_2_2) & city(all_2_3) & hollywood(all_2_3) & ! [v0: $i] : % 5.99/1.56 | ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2) | % 5.99/1.56 | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ in(v1, v0) | ~ down(v1, v2) | ~ % 5.99/1.56 | barrel(v1, v3) | ~ old(v3) | ~ dirty(v3) | ~ white(v3) | ~ % 5.99/1.56 | car(v3) | ~ chevy(v3) | ~ lonely(v2) | ~ way(v2) | ~ % 5.99/1.56 | street(v2) | ~ event(v1) | ~ city(v0) | ~ hollywood(v0))) | % 5.99/1.56 | (in(all_2_2, all_2_3) & down(all_2_2, all_2_1) & barrel(all_2_2, % 5.99/1.56 | all_2_0) & old(all_2_0) & dirty(all_2_0) & white(all_2_0) & % 5.99/1.56 | car(all_2_0) & chevy(all_2_0) & lonely(all_2_1) & way(all_2_1) & % 5.99/1.56 | street(all_2_1) & event(all_2_2) & city(all_2_3) & % 5.99/1.56 | hollywood(all_2_3) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! % 5.99/1.57 | [v3: $i] : ( ~ $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ % 5.99/1.57 | in(v1, v0) | ~ down(v1, v3) | ~ barrel(v1, v2) | ~ old(v2) | % 5.99/1.57 | ~ dirty(v2) | ~ white(v2) | ~ car(v2) | ~ chevy(v2) | ~ % 5.99/1.57 | lonely(v3) | ~ way(v3) | ~ street(v3) | ~ event(v1) | ~ % 5.99/1.57 | city(v0) | ~ hollywood(v0)))) % 5.99/1.57 | % 5.99/1.57 | ALPHA: (1) implies: % 5.99/1.57 | (2) $i(all_2_3) % 5.99/1.57 | (3) $i(all_2_2) % 5.99/1.57 | (4) $i(all_2_1) % 5.99/1.57 | (5) $i(all_2_0) % 5.99/1.57 | (6) (in(all_2_2, all_2_3) & down(all_2_2, all_2_0) & barrel(all_2_2, % 5.99/1.57 | all_2_1) & old(all_2_1) & dirty(all_2_1) & white(all_2_1) & % 5.99/1.57 | car(all_2_1) & chevy(all_2_1) & lonely(all_2_0) & way(all_2_0) & % 5.99/1.57 | street(all_2_0) & event(all_2_2) & city(all_2_3) & hollywood(all_2_3) % 5.99/1.57 | & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ $i(v3) % 5.99/1.57 | | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ in(v1, v0) | ~ down(v1, % 5.99/1.57 | v2) | ~ barrel(v1, v3) | ~ old(v3) | ~ dirty(v3) | ~ % 5.99/1.57 | white(v3) | ~ car(v3) | ~ chevy(v3) | ~ lonely(v2) | ~ way(v2) % 5.99/1.57 | | ~ street(v2) | ~ event(v1) | ~ city(v0) | ~ hollywood(v0))) | % 5.99/1.57 | (in(all_2_2, all_2_3) & down(all_2_2, all_2_1) & barrel(all_2_2, % 5.99/1.57 | all_2_0) & old(all_2_0) & dirty(all_2_0) & white(all_2_0) & % 5.99/1.57 | car(all_2_0) & chevy(all_2_0) & lonely(all_2_1) & way(all_2_1) & % 5.99/1.57 | street(all_2_1) & event(all_2_2) & city(all_2_3) & hollywood(all_2_3) % 5.99/1.57 | & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ $i(v3) % 5.99/1.57 | | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ in(v1, v0) | ~ down(v1, % 5.99/1.57 | v3) | ~ barrel(v1, v2) | ~ old(v2) | ~ dirty(v2) | ~ % 5.99/1.57 | white(v2) | ~ car(v2) | ~ chevy(v2) | ~ lonely(v3) | ~ way(v3) % 5.99/1.57 | | ~ street(v3) | ~ event(v1) | ~ city(v0) | ~ hollywood(v0))) % 5.99/1.57 | % 5.99/1.57 | BETA: splitting (6) gives: % 5.99/1.57 | % 5.99/1.57 | Case 1: % 5.99/1.57 | | % 5.99/1.57 | | (7) in(all_2_2, all_2_3) & down(all_2_2, all_2_0) & barrel(all_2_2, % 5.99/1.57 | | all_2_1) & old(all_2_1) & dirty(all_2_1) & white(all_2_1) & % 5.99/1.57 | | car(all_2_1) & chevy(all_2_1) & lonely(all_2_0) & way(all_2_0) & % 5.99/1.57 | | street(all_2_0) & event(all_2_2) & city(all_2_3) & hollywood(all_2_3) % 5.99/1.57 | | & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ $i(v3) % 5.99/1.57 | | | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ in(v1, v0) | ~ down(v1, % 5.99/1.57 | | v2) | ~ barrel(v1, v3) | ~ old(v3) | ~ dirty(v3) | ~ % 5.99/1.57 | | white(v3) | ~ car(v3) | ~ chevy(v3) | ~ lonely(v2) | ~ way(v2) % 5.99/1.57 | | | ~ street(v2) | ~ event(v1) | ~ city(v0) | ~ hollywood(v0)) % 5.99/1.57 | | % 5.99/1.57 | | ALPHA: (7) implies: % 6.48/1.57 | | (8) hollywood(all_2_3) % 6.48/1.57 | | (9) city(all_2_3) % 6.48/1.57 | | (10) event(all_2_2) % 6.48/1.57 | | (11) street(all_2_0) % 6.48/1.57 | | (12) way(all_2_0) % 6.48/1.58 | | (13) lonely(all_2_0) % 6.48/1.58 | | (14) chevy(all_2_1) % 6.48/1.58 | | (15) car(all_2_1) % 6.48/1.58 | | (16) white(all_2_1) % 6.48/1.58 | | (17) dirty(all_2_1) % 6.48/1.58 | | (18) old(all_2_1) % 6.48/1.58 | | (19) barrel(all_2_2, all_2_1) % 6.48/1.58 | | (20) down(all_2_2, all_2_0) % 6.48/1.58 | | (21) in(all_2_2, all_2_3) % 6.48/1.58 | | (22) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ $i(v3) | % 6.48/1.58 | | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ in(v1, v0) | ~ down(v1, % 6.48/1.58 | | v2) | ~ barrel(v1, v3) | ~ old(v3) | ~ dirty(v3) | ~ % 6.48/1.58 | | white(v3) | ~ car(v3) | ~ chevy(v3) | ~ lonely(v2) | ~ way(v2) % 6.48/1.58 | | | ~ street(v2) | ~ event(v1) | ~ city(v0) | ~ hollywood(v0)) % 6.48/1.58 | | % 6.48/1.58 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (22) with all_2_3, all_2_2, all_2_0, all_2_1, % 6.48/1.58 | | simplifying with (2), (3), (4), (5), (8), (9), (10), (11), % 6.48/1.58 | | (12), (13), (14), (15), (16), (17), (18), (19), (20), (21) % 6.48/1.58 | | gives: % 6.48/1.58 | | (23) $false % 6.48/1.58 | | % 6.48/1.58 | | CLOSE: (23) is inconsistent. % 6.48/1.58 | | % 6.48/1.58 | Case 2: % 6.48/1.58 | | % 6.52/1.58 | | (24) in(all_2_2, all_2_3) & down(all_2_2, all_2_1) & barrel(all_2_2, % 6.52/1.58 | | all_2_0) & old(all_2_0) & dirty(all_2_0) & white(all_2_0) & % 6.52/1.58 | | car(all_2_0) & chevy(all_2_0) & lonely(all_2_1) & way(all_2_1) & % 6.52/1.58 | | street(all_2_1) & event(all_2_2) & city(all_2_3) & % 6.52/1.58 | | hollywood(all_2_3) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! % 6.52/1.58 | | [v3: $i] : ( ~ $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ % 6.52/1.58 | | in(v1, v0) | ~ down(v1, v3) | ~ barrel(v1, v2) | ~ old(v2) | ~ % 6.52/1.58 | | dirty(v2) | ~ white(v2) | ~ car(v2) | ~ chevy(v2) | ~ % 6.52/1.58 | | lonely(v3) | ~ way(v3) | ~ street(v3) | ~ event(v1) | ~ % 6.52/1.58 | | city(v0) | ~ hollywood(v0)) % 6.52/1.58 | | % 6.52/1.58 | | ALPHA: (24) implies: % 6.52/1.58 | | (25) hollywood(all_2_3) % 6.52/1.58 | | (26) city(all_2_3) % 6.52/1.58 | | (27) event(all_2_2) % 6.52/1.58 | | (28) street(all_2_1) % 6.52/1.59 | | (29) way(all_2_1) % 6.52/1.59 | | (30) lonely(all_2_1) % 6.52/1.59 | | (31) chevy(all_2_0) % 6.52/1.59 | | (32) car(all_2_0) % 6.52/1.59 | | (33) white(all_2_0) % 6.52/1.59 | | (34) dirty(all_2_0) % 6.52/1.59 | | (35) old(all_2_0) % 6.52/1.59 | | (36) barrel(all_2_2, all_2_0) % 6.52/1.59 | | (37) down(all_2_2, all_2_1) % 6.52/1.59 | | (38) in(all_2_2, all_2_3) % 6.52/1.59 | | (39) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ( ~ $i(v3) | % 6.52/1.59 | | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ in(v1, v0) | ~ down(v1, % 6.52/1.59 | | v3) | ~ barrel(v1, v2) | ~ old(v2) | ~ dirty(v2) | ~ % 6.52/1.59 | | white(v2) | ~ car(v2) | ~ chevy(v2) | ~ lonely(v3) | ~ way(v3) % 6.52/1.59 | | | ~ street(v3) | ~ event(v1) | ~ city(v0) | ~ hollywood(v0)) % 6.52/1.59 | | % 6.52/1.59 | | GROUND_INST: instantiating (39) with all_2_3, all_2_2, all_2_0, all_2_1, % 6.52/1.59 | | simplifying with (2), (3), (4), (5), (25), (26), (27), (28), % 6.52/1.59 | | (29), (30), (31), (32), (33), (34), (35), (36), (37), (38) % 6.52/1.59 | | gives: % 6.52/1.59 | | (40) $false % 6.52/1.59 | | % 6.52/1.59 | | CLOSE: (40) is inconsistent. % 6.52/1.59 | | % 6.52/1.59 | End of split % 6.52/1.59 | % 6.52/1.59 End of proof % 6.52/1.59 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 6.52/1.59 % 6.52/1.59 1004ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------