%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : NLP002-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:34:03 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.15s 11.85s
% Output : Saturation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_76ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_128ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
( ~ vehicle(X1)
| transport(X1) ),
c_0_52,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_56,plain,
( ~ car(X1)
| vehicle(X1) ),
c_0_53,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_58,plain,
( ~ transport(X1)
| instrumentality(X1) ),
c_0_54,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_59,plain,
( ~ car(X1)
| transport(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_56]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_66,plain,
( ~ instrumentality(X1)
| artifact(X1) ),
c_0_57,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_67,plain,
( ~ car(X1)
| instrumentality(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_59]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_70,plain,
( ~ object(X1)
| entity(X1) ),
c_0_60,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_71,plain,
( ~ artifact(X1)
| object(X1) ),
c_0_61,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_73,plain,
( ~ location(X1)
| object(X1) ),
c_0_62,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_74,plain,
( ~ city(X1)
| location(X1) ),
c_0_63,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_77,plain,
( ~ have(X3,X2,X1)
| ~ nonhuman(X2)
| ~ nonhuman(X1)
| partof(X1,X2) ),
c_0_64,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_78,plain,
( ~ of(X1,X2)
| have(skf1(X1,X2),X2,X1) ),
c_0_65,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_80,plain,
( ~ car(X1)
| artifact(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_66,c_0_67]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_81,negated_conjecture,
car(skc4),
clause48,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_82,plain,
( ~ eventuality(X1)
| ~ entity(X1) ),
c_0_68,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_83,plain,
( ~ event(X1)
| eventuality(X1) ),
c_0_69,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_84,plain,
( ~ artifact(X1)
| entity(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_70,c_0_71]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_85,plain,
( ~ way(X1)
| artifact(X1) ),
c_0_72,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_86,plain,
( ~ city(X1)
| object(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_73,c_0_74]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_87,plain,
( ~ artifact(X1)
| ~ location(X1) ),
c_0_75,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_88,plain,
( ~ partof(X1,X3)
| ~ partof(X1,X2)
| X3 = X2 ),
c_0_76,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_89,plain,
( ~ nonhuman(X1)
| ~ nonhuman(X2)
| ~ of(X1,X2)
| partof(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_77,c_0_78]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_92,plain,
( ~ instrumentality(X1)
| ~ way(X1) ),
c_0_79,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_93,negated_conjecture,
artifact(skc4),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_80,c_0_81]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_94,plain,
( ~ event(X1)
| ~ entity(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_82,c_0_83]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_95,plain,
( ~ way(X1)
| entity(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_84,c_0_85]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_96,plain,
( ~ city(X1)
| entity(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_70,c_0_86]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_97,negated_conjecture,
city(skc7),
clause40,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_98,plain,
( ~ city(X1)
| ~ artifact(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_87,c_0_74]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_99,plain,
( ~ nonhuman(X3)
| ~ nonhuman(X2)
| ~ of(X3,X2)
| ~ partof(X3,X1)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_88,c_0_89]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_101,plain,
( ~ event(X1)
| ~ have(X1,X2,X3)
| of(X2,X3) ),
c_0_90,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_102,axiom,
event(skf1(X1,X2)),
clause1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_103,plain,
( ~ have(X2,X1,X3)
| ~ human(X1)
| owner(X1) ),
c_0_91,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_122,plain,
( ~ way(X1)
| ~ car(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_92,c_0_67]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_123,negated_conjecture,
entity(skc4),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_84,c_0_93]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_124,plain,
( ~ event(X1)
| ~ way(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_94,c_0_95]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_125,negated_conjecture,
way(skc5),
clause43,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_126,negated_conjecture,
entity(skc7),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_96,c_0_97]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_127,negated_conjecture,
~ artifact(skc7),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_98,c_0_97]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_128,plain,
( ~ nonhuman(X1)
| ~ nonhuman(X3)
| ~ nonhuman(X2)
| ~ of(X3,X1)
| ~ of(X3,X2)
| X1 = X2 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_99,c_0_89]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_129,plain,
( ~ have(X2,X1,X3)
| ~ human(X1)
| of(X1,X3) ),
c_0_100,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_130,plain,
( ~ of(X2,X1)
| of(X1,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_101,c_0_78]),c_0_102])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_131,plain,
( ~ human(X1)
| ~ of(X2,X1)
| owner(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_103,c_0_78]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_132,plain,
( ~ of(X1,X2)
| ~ owner(X1)
| have(X3,X1,X2) ),
c_0_104,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_133,plain,
( ~ of(X1,X2)
| ~ owner(X1)
| human(X1) ),
c_0_105,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_134,plain,
( ~ old(X1)
| ~ new(X1) ),
c_0_106,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_135,plain,
( ~ abstraction(X1)
| ~ eventuality(X1) ),
c_0_107,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_136,plain,
( ~ male(X1)
| ~ female(X1) ),
c_0_108,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_137,plain,
( ~ man(X1)
| ~ woman(X1) ),
c_0_109,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_138,plain,
( ~ abstraction(X1)
| ~ entity(X1) ),
c_0_110,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_139,plain,
( ~ human(X1)
| ~ nonhuman(X1) ),
c_0_111,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_140,plain,
( ~ chevy(X1)
| car(X1) ),
c_0_112,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_141,plain,
( ~ street(X1)
| way(X1) ),
c_0_113,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_142,plain,
( ~ hollywood(X1)
| city(X1) ),
c_0_114,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_143,plain,
( ~ man(X1)
| male(X1) ),
c_0_115,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_144,plain,
( ~ male(X1)
| human(X1) ),
c_0_116,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_145,plain,
( ~ female(X1)
| human(X1) ),
c_0_117,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_146,plain,
( ~ woman(X1)
| female(X1) ),
c_0_118,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_147,plain,
( ~ drs(X1)
| proposition(X1) ),
c_0_119,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_148,plain,
( ~ proposition(X1)
| drs(X1) ),
c_0_120,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_149,plain,
( ~ nonhuman(X1)
| entity(X1) ),
c_0_121,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_150,negated_conjecture,
~ way(skc4),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_122,c_0_81]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_151,negated_conjecture,
~ event(skc4),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_94,c_0_123]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_152,negated_conjecture,
~ event(skc5),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_124,c_0_125]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_153,negated_conjecture,
~ event(skc7),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_94,c_0_126]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_154,negated_conjecture,
~ way(skc7),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_127,c_0_85]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_155,negated_conjecture,
barrel(skc6,skc4),
clause52,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_156,negated_conjecture,
down(skc6,skc5),
clause51,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_157,negated_conjecture,
in(skc6,skc7),
clause50,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_158,negated_conjecture,
white(skc4),
clause47,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_159,negated_conjecture,
dirty(skc4),
clause46,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_160,negated_conjecture,
lonely(skc5),
clause44,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_161,negated_conjecture,
old(skc4),
clause45,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_162,negated_conjecture,
chevy(skc4),
clause49,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_163,negated_conjecture,
street(skc5),
clause42,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_164,negated_conjecture,
hollywood(skc7),
clause39,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_165,negated_conjecture,
event(skc6),
clause41,
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : NLP002-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/11.78 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/11.78 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/11.78 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/11.78 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/11.78 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/11.78 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/11.78 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/11.78 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:31:24 UTC 2026
% 0.12/11.79 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/11.79 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/11.83 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/11.83 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/11.85 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/11.85 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/11.85 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/11.85 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/11.85 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/11.85 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/11.85 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/11.85 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 4061735 completed with status 1
% 0.15/11.85 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.15/11.85 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/11.85 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/11.85 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/11.85 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/11.85 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/11.85 % Search class: FHHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/11.85 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/11.85 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/11.85 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/11.85 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/11.85 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/11.85 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/11.85 % SubtermCWHack with pid 4061739 completed with status 1
% 0.15/11.85 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/11.85 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/11.85 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/11.85 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/11.85 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/11.85 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/11.85 % Search class: FHHSF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/11.85 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/11.85 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/11.85 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.15/11.85
% 0.15/11.85 % No proof found!
% 0.15/11.85 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.15/11.85 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.15/11.85 % Parsed axioms : 52
% 0.15/11.85 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/11.85 % Initial clauses : 52
% 0.15/11.85 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/11.85 % Initial clauses in saturation : 52
% 0.15/11.85 % Processed clauses : 78
% 0.15/11.85 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/11.85 % ...subsumed : 1
% 0.15/11.85 % ...remaining for further processing : 77
% 0.15/11.85 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/11.85 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/11.85 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/11.85 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.15/11.85 % Generated clauses : 30
% 0.15/11.85 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 26
% 0.15/11.85 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/11.85 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/11.85 % Paramodulations : 30
% 0.15/11.85 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/11.85 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/11.85 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/11.85 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/11.85 % Total rewrite steps : 4
% 0.15/11.85 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.15/11.85 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/11.85 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/11.85 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/11.85 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/11.85 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/11.85 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/11.85 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/11.85 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/11.85 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/11.85 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/11.85 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/11.85 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/11.85 % Current number of processed clauses : 77
% 0.15/11.85 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 18
% 0.15/11.85 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/11.85 % Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.15/11.85 % Non-unit-clauses : 53
% 0.15/11.85 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.15/11.85 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.15/11.85 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/11.85 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.15/11.85 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1177
% 0.15/11.85 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 890
% 0.15/11.85 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.15/11.85 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 240
% 0.15/11.85 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/11.85 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.15/11.85 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.15/11.85 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/11.85 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/11.85 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1446
% 0.15/11.85 % Search garbage collected termcells : 95
% 0.15/11.85
% 0.15/11.85 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/11.85 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/11.85 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/11.85 % Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.15/11.85 % Maximum resident set size: 3612 pages
% 0.15/11.85
% 0.15/11.85 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/11.85 % User time : 0.015 s
% 0.15/11.85 % System time : 0.013 s
% 0.15/11.85 % Total time : 0.028 s
% 0.15/11.85 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.15/11.85 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------