%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : NLP006-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:36:27 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.08s 0.44s
% Output : Saturation 0.08s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named clause15ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_65ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_65,negated_conjecture,
fellow(skc15),
clause15,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_66,negated_conjecture,
seat(skc17),
clause13,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_77,negated_conjecture,
young(skc16),
clause14,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_85,negated_conjecture,
event(skc20),
clause10,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_86,negated_conjecture,
city(skc21),
clause9,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_95,negated_conjecture,
old(skc19),
clause11,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_105,negated_conjecture,
street(skc18),
clause12,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_110,negated_conjecture,
~ ssSkC0,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_103,c_0_104]),c_0_105])]),c_0_106]),c_0_107]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_121,negated_conjecture,
( ~ seat(X7)
| ~ furniture(X7)
| ~ front(X7)
| ~ in(X6,X7)
| ~ in(X5,X7)
| ~ young(X6)
| ~ man(X6)
| ~ fellow(X6)
| ~ fellow(X5)
| ~ man(X5)
| ~ young(X5)
| ~ in(X3,X4)
| ~ city(X4)
| ~ hollywood(X4)
| ~ event(X3)
| ~ barrel(X3,X2)
| ~ down(X3,X1)
| ~ old(X2)
| ~ dirty(X2)
| ~ white(X2)
| ~ car(X2)
| ~ chevy(X2)
| ~ street(X1)
| ~ way(X1)
| ~ lonely(X1)
| X6 = X5
| ssSkC0 ),
c_0_108,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_122,negated_conjecture,
fellow(skc23),
clause7,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_123,negated_conjecture,
seat(skc24),
clause6,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_124,negated_conjecture,
young(skc22),
clause8,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_125,negated_conjecture,
front(skc25),
clause5,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_126,negated_conjecture,
in(skc28,skc29),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_109,c_0_110]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_128,negated_conjecture,
in(skc22,skc25),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_111,c_0_110]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_129,negated_conjecture,
man(skc22),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_112,c_0_110]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_130,negated_conjecture,
furniture(skc25),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_113,c_0_110]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_131,negated_conjecture,
fellow(skc22),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_114,c_0_110]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_132,negated_conjecture,
seat(skc25),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_115,c_0_110]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_133,negated_conjecture,
in(skc23,skc24),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_116,c_0_110]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_134,negated_conjecture,
man(skc23),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_117,c_0_110]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_135,negated_conjecture,
furniture(skc24),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_118,c_0_110]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_136,negated_conjecture,
young(skc23),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_119,c_0_110]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_137,negated_conjecture,
front(skc24),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_120,c_0_110]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_139,negated_conjecture,
event(skc28),
clause2,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_140,negated_conjecture,
city(skc29),
clause1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_143,negated_conjecture,
hollywood(skc29),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_127,c_0_110]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_152,negated_conjecture,
old(skc27),
clause3,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_155,negated_conjecture,
barrel(skc28,skc27),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_144,c_0_110]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_156,negated_conjecture,
dirty(skc27),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_145,c_0_110]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_157,negated_conjecture,
white(skc27),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_146,c_0_110]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_158,negated_conjecture,
car(skc27),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_147,c_0_110]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_159,negated_conjecture,
chevy(skc27),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_148,c_0_110]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_166,negated_conjecture,
street(skc26),
clause4,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_170,negated_conjecture,
down(skc28,skc26),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_160,c_0_110]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_171,negated_conjecture,
way(skc26),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_161,c_0_110]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_172,negated_conjecture,
lonely(skc26),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_162,c_0_110]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_177,negated_conjecture,
( skc23 != skc22
| ssSkC0 ),
c_0_168,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_178,negated_conjecture,
( ~ front(skc29)
| ~ seat(skc29)
| ~ fellow(X1)
| ~ fellow(skc28)
| ~ young(X1)
| ~ young(skc28)
| ~ furniture(skc29)
| ~ man(X1)
| ~ man(skc28)
| ~ in(X1,skc29)
| X1 = skc28 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_169,c_0_170]),c_0_171]),c_0_172]),c_0_166])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_179,negated_conjecture,
( ~ fellow(X1)
| ~ young(X1)
| ~ man(X1)
| ~ in(X1,skc25)
| X1 = skc22 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_173,c_0_170]),c_0_171]),c_0_172]),c_0_166])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_180,negated_conjecture,
( ~ fellow(X1)
| ~ young(X1)
| ~ man(X1)
| ~ in(X1,skc24)
| X1 = skc23 ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_174,c_0_170]),c_0_171]),c_0_172]),c_0_166])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_181,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(skc22,skc24)
| skc22 = skc23 ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_175,c_0_129]),c_0_124]),c_0_131])]),c_0_110]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_182,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(skc23,skc25)
| skc22 = skc23 ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_176,c_0_134]),c_0_136]),c_0_122])]),c_0_110]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_183,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(skc22,skc24)
| ssSkC0 ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_175,c_0_112]),c_0_124])]),c_0_114]),c_0_177]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_184,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(skc23,skc25)
| ssSkC0 ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_176,c_0_117]),c_0_122])]),c_0_119]),c_0_177]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : NLP006-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.36 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:31:10 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.08/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.44 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.08/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.08/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.08/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.44 % new_bool_3 with pid 684286 completed with status 1
% 0.08/0.44 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.08/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.08/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.08/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.08/0.44 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.08/0.44 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.08/0.44 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.08/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.44 % SubtermCWHack with pid 684293 completed with status 1
% 0.08/0.44 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.08/0.44 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.08/0.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.44 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.08/0.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.44 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.08/0.44 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.08/0.44 % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.08/0.44 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.08/0.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.44 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.08/0.44
% 0.08/0.44 % No proof found!
% 0.08/0.44 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.08/0.44 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.08/0.44 % Parsed axioms : 57
% 0.08/0.44 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.08/0.44 % Initial clauses : 57
% 0.08/0.44 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.08/0.44 % Initial clauses in saturation : 57
% 0.08/0.44 % Processed clauses : 116
% 0.08/0.44 % ...of these trivial : 3
% 0.08/0.44 % ...subsumed : 2
% 0.08/0.44 % ...remaining for further processing : 111
% 0.08/0.44 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.08/0.44 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.08/0.44 % Backward-subsumed : 46
% 0.08/0.44 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.08/0.44 % Generated clauses : 97
% 0.08/0.44 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 90
% 0.08/0.44 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.08/0.44 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 49
% 0.08/0.44 % Paramodulations : 77
% 0.08/0.44 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.08/0.44 % NegExts : 0
% 0.08/0.44 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.08/0.44 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.08/0.44 % Total rewrite steps : 105
% 0.08/0.44 % ...of those cached : 75
% 0.08/0.44 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.08/0.44 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.08/0.44 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.08/0.44 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.08/0.44 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.08/0.44 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.08/0.44 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.44 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.44 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.44 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.44 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.44 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.08/0.44 % Current number of processed clauses : 45
% 0.08/0.44 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 35
% 0.08/0.44 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.08/0.44 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.08/0.44 % Non-unit-clauses : 9
% 0.08/0.44 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.08/0.44 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.08/0.44 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.08/0.44 % Current number of archived clauses : 66
% 0.08/0.44 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3565
% 0.08/0.44 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 521
% 0.08/0.44 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 75
% 0.08/0.44 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 80
% 0.08/0.44 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.08/0.44 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.08/0.44 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.08/0.44 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.08/0.44 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.08/0.44 % Termbank termtop insertions : 6459
% 0.08/0.44 % Search garbage collected termcells : 151
% 0.08/0.44
% 0.08/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.08/0.44 % User time : 0.009 s
% 0.08/0.44 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.08/0.44 % Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.08/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 3680 pages
% 0.08/0.44
% 0.08/0.44 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.08/0.44 % User time : 0.012 s
% 0.08/0.44 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.08/0.44 % Total time : 0.019 s
% 0.08/0.44 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.08/0.44 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------