↑ Up

E---3.5.1.CSA-Sat.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : NLP012+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:34:15 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 0.26s 0.57s
% Output   : Saturation 0.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_46ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_49ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    epred1_0,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]),c_0_42]),c_0_43]),c_0_44]),c_0_45]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    ( ~ hollywood(X5)
    | ~ city(X5)
    | ~ event(X4)
    | ~ chevy(X7)
    | ~ car(X7)
    | ~ white(X7)
    | ~ dirty(X7)
    | ~ old(X7)
    | ~ street(X6)
    | ~ way(X6)
    | ~ lonely(X6)
    | ~ barrel(X4,X7)
    | ~ down(X4,X6)
    | ~ in(X4,X5)
    | ~ in(X1,X3)
    | ~ in(X2,X3)
    | ~ seat(X3)
    | ~ furniture(X3)
    | ~ front(X3)
    | ~ fellow(X1)
    | ~ fellow(X2)
    | ~ man(X1)
    | ~ man(X2)
    | ~ young(X1)
    | ~ young(X2)
    | epred2_0
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_46])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_59,negated_conjecture,
    ~ epred2_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_65,plain,
    in(esk12_0,esk11_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_59]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_73,plain,
    event(esk12_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_59]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_74,plain,
    city(esk11_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_62,c_0_59]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_75,plain,
    hollywood(esk11_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_59]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_85,plain,
    down(esk12_0,esk13_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_67,c_0_59]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_86,plain,
    lonely(esk13_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_70,c_0_59]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_87,plain,
    way(esk13_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_69,c_0_59]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_88,plain,
    street(esk13_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_68,c_0_59]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_100,plain,
    barrel(esk12_0,esk14_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_77,c_0_59]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_101,plain,
    old(esk14_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_82,c_0_59]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_102,plain,
    dirty(esk14_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_81,c_0_59]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_103,plain,
    white(esk14_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_80,c_0_59]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_104,plain,
    car(esk14_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_79,c_0_59]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_105,plain,
    chevy(esk14_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_78,c_0_59]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_106,plain,
    esk19_0 = esk16_0,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_89,c_0_59]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_107,plain,
    young(esk16_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_90,c_0_59]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_108,plain,
    man(esk16_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_91,c_0_59]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_109,plain,
    fellow(esk16_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_92,c_0_59]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_110,plain,
    esk18_0 = esk15_0,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_93,c_0_59]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_111,plain,
    young(esk15_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_94,c_0_59]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_112,plain,
    man(esk15_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_95,c_0_59]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_113,plain,
    fellow(esk15_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_96,c_0_59]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_116,plain,
    ( esk15_0 != esk16_0
    | epred2_0 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_38]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_117,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,esk11_0)
    | ~ seat(esk11_0)
    | ~ furniture(esk11_0)
    | ~ front(esk11_0)
    | ~ fellow(X1)
    | ~ fellow(esk12_0)
    | ~ man(X1)
    | ~ man(esk12_0)
    | ~ young(X1)
    | ~ young(esk12_0)
    | X1 = esk12_0 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_99,c_0_100]),c_0_101]),c_0_102]),c_0_103]),c_0_104]),c_0_105])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_118,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,esk10_0)
    | ~ fellow(X1)
    | ~ man(X1)
    | ~ young(X1)
    | X1 = esk16_0 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_98,c_0_106]),c_0_106]),c_0_106]),c_0_106]),c_0_59]),c_0_107]),c_0_108]),c_0_109])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_119,plain,
    ( ~ in(X1,esk17_0)
    | ~ fellow(X1)
    | ~ man(X1)
    | ~ young(X1)
    | X1 = esk15_0 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_97,c_0_110]),c_0_110]),c_0_110]),c_0_110]),c_0_59]),c_0_111]),c_0_112]),c_0_113])]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_120,plain,
    ( ~ in(esk16_0,esk17_0)
    | esk16_0 = esk15_0 ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_114,c_0_107]),c_0_108]),c_0_109])]),c_0_59]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_121,plain,
    ( ~ in(esk15_0,esk10_0)
    | esk16_0 = esk15_0 ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_115,c_0_111]),c_0_112]),c_0_113])]),c_0_59]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_122,plain,
    ( ~ in(esk16_0,esk17_0)
    | epred2_0 ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_114,c_0_90]),c_0_92]),c_0_91]),c_0_116]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_123,plain,
    ( ~ in(esk15_0,esk10_0)
    | epred2_0 ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_115,c_0_94]),c_0_96]),c_0_95]),c_0_116]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_124,plain,
    in(esk16_0,esk10_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_59]),c_0_106]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_125,plain,
    in(esk15_0,esk17_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_59]),c_0_110]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_126,plain,
    front(esk17_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_59]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_127,plain,
    front(esk10_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_59]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_128,plain,
    furniture(esk17_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_52,c_0_59]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_129,plain,
    furniture(esk10_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_59]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_130,plain,
    seat(esk17_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_59]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_131,plain,
    seat(esk10_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_59]),
    [final] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : NLP012+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.43  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.43  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.43  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.44  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.44  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.44  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:29:35 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.44  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.44  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.26/0.51  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.26/0.51  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.26/0.57  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.26/0.57  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.57  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.57  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.57  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.57  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.57  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.57  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 4075182 completed with status 1
% 0.26/0.57  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.26/0.57  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.57  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.57  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.57  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.26/0.57  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.26/0.57  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.57  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.26/0.57  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.57  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.57  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.57  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.57  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.57  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 4075190 completed with status 1
% 0.26/0.57  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.26/0.57  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.26/0.57  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.26/0.57  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.26/0.57  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.26/0.57  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.26/0.57  % Search class: FGHSF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.26/0.57  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.26/0.57  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.57  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.57  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.26/0.57  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.26/0.57  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.26/0.57  
% 0.26/0.57  % No proof found!
% 0.26/0.57  % SZS status CounterSatisfiable
% 0.26/0.57  % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.26/0.58  % Parsed axioms                        : 1
% 0.26/0.58  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.26/0.58  % Initial clauses                      : 62
% 0.26/0.58  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.26/0.58  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 62
% 0.26/0.58  % Processed clauses                    : 238
% 0.26/0.58  % ...of these trivial                  : 2
% 0.26/0.58  % ...subsumed                          : 10
% 0.26/0.58  % ...remaining for further processing  : 226
% 0.26/0.58  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 4
% 0.26/0.58  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.26/0.58  % Backward-subsumed                    : 52
% 0.26/0.58  % Backward-rewritten                   : 37
% 0.26/0.58  % Generated clauses                    : 174
% 0.26/0.58  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 176
% 0.26/0.58  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.26/0.58  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 111
% 0.26/0.58  % Paramodulations                      : 140
% 0.26/0.58  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.26/0.58  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.26/0.58  % Equation resolutions                 : 4
% 0.26/0.58  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.26/0.58  % Total rewrite steps                  : 84
% 0.26/0.58  % ...of those cached                   : 56
% 0.26/0.58  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.26/0.58  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.26/0.58  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.26/0.58  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.26/0.58  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.26/0.58  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.26/0.58  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.26/0.58  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.26/0.58  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.26/0.58  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.26/0.58  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.26/0.58  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.26/0.58  % Current number of processed clauses  : 41
% 0.26/0.58  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 31
% 0.26/0.58  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/0.58  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.26/0.58  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 9
% 0.26/0.58  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.26/0.58  % ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.26/0.58  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.26/0.58  % Current number of archived clauses   : 183
% 0.26/0.58  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 21069
% 0.26/0.58  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1535
% 0.26/0.58  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 172
% 0.26/0.58  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 94
% 0.26/0.58  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.26/0.58  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 3
% 0.26/0.58  % BW rewrite match successes           : 3
% 0.26/0.58  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.26/0.58  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.26/0.58  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 14943
% 0.26/0.58  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 1642
% 0.26/0.58  
% 0.26/0.58  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.58  % User time                : 0.039 s
% 0.26/0.58  % System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.26/0.58  % Total time               : 0.045 s
% 0.26/0.58  % Maximum resident set size: 3688 pages
% 0.26/0.58  
% 0.26/0.58  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.58  % User time                : 0.176 s
% 0.26/0.58  % System time              : 0.023 s
% 0.26/0.58  % Total time               : 0.199 s
% 0.26/0.58  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.26/0.58  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------