%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Etableau---0.67 % Problem : NLP033-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % Computer : n029.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Mon Jul 18 02:11:51 EDT 2022 % Result : Satisfiable 4.17s 0.90s % Output : CNFRefutation 4.17s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.06/0.12 % Problem : NLP033-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0. % 0.06/0.12 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jul 1 05:58:39 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.12/0.37 # No SInE strategy applied % 0.12/0.37 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2SI % 0.12/0.37 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP. % 0.12/0.37 # % 0.12/0.37 # Presaturation interreduction done % 0.12/0.37 # Number of axioms: 38 Number of unprocessed: 38 % 0.12/0.37 # Tableaux proof search. % 0.12/0.37 # APR header successfully linked. % 0.12/0.37 # Hello from C++ % 0.12/0.37 # The folding up rule is enabled... % 0.12/0.37 # Local unification is enabled... % 0.12/0.37 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels... % 0.12/0.37 # 38 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification % 0.12/0.37 # Creating start rules for all 38 conjectures. % 0.12/0.37 # There are 38 start rule candidates: % 0.12/0.37 # Found 2 unit axioms. % 0.12/0.37 # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on. % 0.12/0.37 # 38 start rule tableaux created. % 0.12/0.37 # 36 extension rule candidate clauses % 0.12/0.37 # 2 unit axiom clauses % 0.12/0.37 % 0.12/0.37 # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process. % 4.17/0.90 # 18345 Satisfiable branch % 4.17/0.90 # Satisfiable branch found. % 4.17/0.90 # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts. % 4.17/0.90 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked. % 4.17/0.90 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts. % 4.17/0.90 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations. % 4.17/0.90 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations. % 4.17/0.90 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction. % 4.17/0.90 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch. % 4.17/0.90 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch. % 4.17/0.90 # SZS status Satisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 4.17/0.90 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 4.17/0.90 # Begin clausification derivation % 4.17/0.90 % 4.17/0.90 # End clausification derivation % 4.17/0.90 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_39, negated_conjecture, (actual_world(skc52))). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_40, negated_conjecture, (actual_world(skc5))). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_43, negated_conjecture, (group(skc5,skc6)|~ssSkC0)). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_41, negated_conjecture, (group(skc52,skc53)|ssSkC0)). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_42, negated_conjecture, (ssSkP2(skc53,skc52)|ssSkC0)). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_44, negated_conjecture, (table(skc5,skc7)|~ssSkC0)). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_45, negated_conjecture, (ssSkP1(skc7,skc6,skc5)|~ssSkC0)). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_48, negated_conjecture, (hamburger(skc5,X1)|~member(skc5,X1,skc6)|~ssSkC0)). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_47, negated_conjecture, (hamburger(skc52,X1)|ssSkC0|~member(skc52,X1,skc53))). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_61, negated_conjecture, (~hamburger(X1,skf12(X1,X2))|~ssSkP2(X3,X1)|~group(X1,X3)|~ssSkC0|~actual_world(X1))). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_52, negated_conjecture, (group(X1,skf22(X1,X2))|~member(X1,X3,X4)|~ssSkP2(X4,X1))). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_46, negated_conjecture, (member(X1,skf26(X1,X2),X2)|ssSkP2(X2,X1))). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_62, negated_conjecture, (member(X1,skf12(X1,X2),X2)|~ssSkP2(X2,X1)|~group(X1,X2)|~ssSkC0|~actual_world(X1))). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_51, negated_conjecture, (table(X1,skf23(X1,X2))|~member(X1,X3,X4)|~ssSkP2(X4,X1))). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_53, negated_conjecture, (three(X1,skf22(X1,X2))|~member(X1,X3,X4)|~ssSkP2(X4,X1))). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_71, negated_conjecture, (ssSkC0|~hamburger(X1,skf29(X1,X2))|~ssSkP1(X3,X4,X1)|~table(X1,X3)|~group(X1,X4)|~actual_world(X1))). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_49, negated_conjecture, (member(X1,skf19(X1,X2,X3),X3)|ssSkP1(X2,X3,X1))). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_50, negated_conjecture, (ssSkP0(X1,X2,X3,X4)|member(X4,skf15(X3,X4,X5,X6),X3))). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_66, negated_conjecture, (young(X1,X2)|~member(X1,X2,skf22(X1,X3))|~member(X1,X4,X5)|~ssSkP2(X5,X1))). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_67, negated_conjecture, (guy(X1,X2)|~member(X1,X2,skf22(X1,X3))|~member(X1,X4,X5)|~ssSkP2(X5,X1))). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_55, negated_conjecture, (group(X1,skf17(X1,X2,X3))|~member(X1,X4,X5)|~ssSkP1(X6,X5,X1))). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_68, negated_conjecture, (young(X1,X2)|~member(X1,X2,skf17(X1,X3,X4))|~member(X1,X5,X6)|~ssSkP1(X7,X6,X1))). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_54, negated_conjecture, (three(X1,skf17(X1,X2,X3))|~member(X1,X4,X5)|~ssSkP1(X6,X5,X1))). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_60, negated_conjecture, (ssSkP0(X1,skf23(X2,X1),skf22(X2,X1),X2)|~member(X2,X1,X3)|~ssSkP2(X3,X2))). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_70, negated_conjecture, (member(X1,skf29(X1,X2),X2)|ssSkC0|~ssSkP1(X3,X2,X1)|~table(X1,X3)|~group(X1,X2)|~actual_world(X1))). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_69, negated_conjecture, (guy(X1,X2)|~member(X1,X2,skf17(X1,X3,X4))|~member(X1,X5,X6)|~ssSkP1(X7,X6,X1))). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_59, negated_conjecture, (ssSkP0(X1,X2,skf17(X3,X2,X1),X3)|~member(X3,X1,X4)|~ssSkP1(X2,X4,X3))). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_73, negated_conjecture, (member(X1,skf27(X1,X2),X2)|ssSkP2(X3,X1)|~three(X1,X2)|~ssSkP0(skf26(X1,X4),X5,X2,X1)|~table(X1,X5)|~group(X1,X2))). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_56, negated_conjecture, (event(X1,skf13(X1,X2,X3,X4))|~ssSkP0(X5,X6,X7,X1)|~member(X1,X8,X7))). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_57, negated_conjecture, (present(X1,skf13(X1,X2,X3,X4))|~ssSkP0(X5,X6,X7,X1)|~member(X1,X8,X7))). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_58, negated_conjecture, (sit(X1,skf13(X1,X2,X3,X4))|~ssSkP0(X5,X6,X7,X1)|~member(X1,X8,X7))). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_63, negated_conjecture, (agent(X1,skf13(X1,X2,X3,X4),X2)|~ssSkP0(X5,X6,X7,X1)|~member(X1,X2,X7))). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_64, negated_conjecture, (at(X1,skf13(X1,X2,X3,X4),X4)|~ssSkP0(X3,X4,X5,X1)|~member(X1,X2,X5))). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_65, negated_conjecture, (with(X1,skf13(X1,X2,X3,X4),X3)|~ssSkP0(X3,X5,X6,X1)|~member(X1,X2,X6))). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_72, negated_conjecture, (member(X1,skf20(X1,X2),X2)|ssSkP1(X3,X4,X1)|~three(X1,X2)|~ssSkP0(skf19(X1,X3,X5),X3,X2,X1)|~group(X1,X2))). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_75, negated_conjecture, (ssSkP2(X1,X2)|~guy(X2,skf27(X2,X3))|~young(X2,skf27(X2,X3))|~three(X2,X4)|~ssSkP0(skf26(X2,X5),X6,X4,X2)|~table(X2,X6)|~group(X2,X4))). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_74, negated_conjecture, (ssSkP1(X1,X2,X3)|~guy(X3,skf20(X3,X4))|~young(X3,skf20(X3,X4))|~three(X3,X5)|~ssSkP0(skf19(X3,X1,X6),X1,X5,X3)|~group(X3,X5))). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_76, negated_conjecture, (ssSkP0(X1,X2,X3,X4)|~with(X4,X5,X1)|~at(X4,X5,X2)|~agent(X4,X5,skf15(X3,X4,X1,X2))|~sit(X4,X5)|~present(X4,X5)|~event(X4,X5))). % 4.17/0.90 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification! % 4.17/0.90 # Begin printing tableau % 4.17/0.90 # Found 4 steps % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_44, negated_conjecture, (table(skc5,skc7)|~ssSkC0), inference(start_rule)). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_199, plain, (table(skc5,skc7)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_75])). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_35369, plain, (ssSkP2(X6,skc5)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_61])). % 4.17/0.90 cnf(i_0_35391, plain, (~actual_world(skc5)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_40])). % 4.17/0.90 # End printing tableau % 4.17/0.90 # SZS output end % 4.17/0.90 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s" % 4.17/0.90 # Child (18345) has found a proof. % 4.17/0.90 % 4.17/0.90 # Proof search is over... % 4.17/0.90 # Freeing feature tree %------------------------------------------------------------------------------