%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : DCTP---1.31 % Problem : NLP096-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v2.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : oldtptp % Command : dctp-wrapper -negpref -complexity -fullrewrite -alternate -resisol %s % Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu % Model : i686 i686 % CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz % Memory : 2018MB % OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Sat Dec 4 10:46:45 EST 2010 % Result : Satisfiable 0.00s % Output : Assurance 0.00s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % running dctp on problem file NLP096-1.oldtptp on host art02.cs.miami.edu % starting preprocessing loop for 38 clauses % no conjecture type clause ... restricting relevance to all-negative clauses % problem statistics for file /tmp/SystemOnTPTP7060/NLP096-1.oldtptp % Syntax : Number of clauses : 38 ( 17 non-Horn; 2 unit) % Number of literals : 192 ( 0 equality) % Maximal clause size : 16 % Number of predicates : 14 ( 1 propositional; 0-3 arity) % Number of functors : 14 ( 3 constant; 0-2 arity) % Number of variables : 100 ( 24 singleton) % Maximal term depth : 2 % Starting proof % Saturation state reached. % !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Exit status is success (MODEL found in 0.01 seconds) !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! % Proof search statistics: % ======================== % Length initial path: 38 % Linking steps (succ/fail): 72 / 36 % Twin-clause inferences: 5 % Eager eliminations: 0 % Rewrites (subgoal/path): 0 / 0 % GR-closures total/c-foldup: 275 / 31 % Links generated/deleted: 88 / 76 % Links sweeped vector/all: 0(0) / 0(0) % Clauses in tableau/pruned: 77 / 16 % Regularity/Tautology fails: 31 / 0 (0) % Renamings/Contractions: 1 / 0 % Variants deleted/subsumed: 25 / 5 % Clauses by splitting: 0 % Variant subsumption tests: 20 % Fails ful/mat/sig/len: 0 / 14 / 1 / 0 % Pre subsumption tests: 1332 % Subsumed unit/path/back: 8 / 0 / 0 % Coupled eliminations: 2 % Simplifications/lemmas: 11 / 0 (0) % Foldups root/context: 0 / 20 % Maximum term depth/compl: 4 / 11 % Relevance vectors: 375 % Unifications/failed: 0 / 0 % Maximum tableau depth: 41 % %------------------------------------------------------------------------------