%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : NLP097-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:34:54 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.23s 0.56s
% Output : Saturation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_38ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_79ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
( ~ actual_world(X1)
| ~ patient(X1,X2,X5)
| ~ agent(X1,X3,X5)
| ~ human_person(X1,X5)
| ~ event(X1,X3)
| ~ past(X1,X3)
| ~ nonreflexive(X1,X3)
| ~ drink(X1,X3)
| ~ coffee(X1,X4)
| ~ patient(X1,X3,X4)
| ~ see(X1,X2)
| ~ nonreflexive(X1,X2)
| ~ past(X1,X2)
| ~ agent(X1,X2,skf32(X1))
| ~ event(X1,X2)
| ssSkC0 ),
c_0_38,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc15,X1)
| ~ in(skc15,X1,skc17)
| agent(skc15,skf20(X1),X1)
| ssSkC0 ),
c_0_39,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
actual_world(skc15),
clause1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc15,X1)
| ~ in(skc15,X1,skc17)
| nonreflexive(skc15,skf20(X2))
| ssSkC0 ),
c_0_40,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc15,X1)
| ~ in(skc15,X1,skc17)
| past(skc15,skf20(X2))
| ssSkC0 ),
c_0_41,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc15,X1)
| ~ in(skc15,X1,skc17)
| event(skc15,skf20(X2))
| ssSkC0 ),
c_0_42,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc15,X1)
| ~ in(skc15,X1,skc17)
| see(skc15,skf20(X2))
| ssSkC0 ),
c_0_43,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_79,negated_conjecture,
( ~ coffee(skc15,X3)
| ~ customer(skc15,skf32(skc15))
| ~ in(skc15,skf32(skc15),skc17)
| ~ human_person(skc15,X2)
| ~ drink(skc15,X1)
| ~ nonreflexive(skc15,X1)
| ~ past(skc15,X1)
| ~ event(skc15,X1)
| ~ patient(skc15,X1,X3)
| ~ patient(skc15,skf20(skf32(skc15)),X2)
| ~ agent(skc15,X1,X2)
| ssSkC0 ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]),c_0_46])]),c_0_47]),c_0_48]),c_0_49]),c_0_50]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_80,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssSkC0
| ~ actual_world(X1)
| ~ restaurant(X1,X4)
| ~ human_person(X1,X6)
| ~ agent(X1,X5,X6)
| ~ patient(X1,X3,X6)
| ~ drink(X1,X5)
| ~ nonreflexive(X1,X5)
| ~ past(X1,X5)
| ~ patient(X1,X5,X2)
| ~ event(X1,X5)
| ~ event(X1,X3)
| ~ agent(X1,X3,skf17(X1,X4,X2))
| ~ past(X1,X3)
| ~ nonreflexive(X1,X3)
| ~ see(X1,X3)
| ~ coffee(X1,X2) ),
c_0_51,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_81,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssSkC0
| ~ customer(skc4,X2)
| ~ in(skc4,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc4,X1)
| agent(skc4,skf11(X3),skf13(X3)) ),
c_0_52,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_82,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssSkC0
| ~ customer(skc4,X2)
| ~ in(skc4,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc4,X1)
| patient(skc4,skf11(X3),skf12(X3)) ),
c_0_53,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_83,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssSkC0
| ~ actual_world(X1)
| ~ restaurant(X1,X3)
| ~ coffee(X1,X2)
| in(X1,skf17(X1,X3,X4),X3) ),
c_0_54,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_84,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssSkC0
| ~ customer(skc4,X2)
| ~ in(skc4,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc4,X1)
| patient(skc4,skf10(X3),skf13(X3)) ),
c_0_55,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_85,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssSkC0
| ~ customer(skc4,X2)
| ~ in(skc4,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc4,X1)
| agent(skc4,skf10(X2),X2) ),
c_0_56,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_86,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssSkC0
| ~ actual_world(X1)
| ~ restaurant(X1,X3)
| ~ coffee(X1,X2)
| customer(X1,skf17(X1,X4,X5)) ),
c_0_57,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_87,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssSkC0
| ~ customer(skc4,X2)
| ~ in(skc4,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc4,X1)
| see(skc4,skf10(X3)) ),
c_0_58,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_88,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssSkC0
| ~ customer(skc4,X2)
| ~ in(skc4,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc4,X1)
| event(skc4,skf11(X3)) ),
c_0_59,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_89,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssSkC0
| ~ customer(skc4,X2)
| ~ in(skc4,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc4,X1)
| event(skc4,skf10(X3)) ),
c_0_60,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_90,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssSkC0
| ~ customer(skc4,X2)
| ~ in(skc4,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc4,X1)
| past(skc4,skf11(X3)) ),
c_0_61,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_91,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssSkC0
| ~ customer(skc4,X2)
| ~ in(skc4,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc4,X1)
| past(skc4,skf10(X3)) ),
c_0_62,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_92,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssSkC0
| ~ customer(skc4,X2)
| ~ in(skc4,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc4,X1)
| nonreflexive(skc4,skf11(X3)) ),
c_0_63,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_93,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssSkC0
| ~ customer(skc4,X2)
| ~ in(skc4,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc4,X1)
| nonreflexive(skc4,skf10(X3)) ),
c_0_64,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_94,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssSkC0
| ~ customer(skc4,X2)
| ~ in(skc4,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc4,X1)
| drink(skc4,skf11(X3)) ),
c_0_65,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_95,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssSkC0
| ~ customer(skc4,X2)
| ~ in(skc4,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc4,X1)
| human_person(skc4,skf13(X3)) ),
c_0_66,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_96,negated_conjecture,
( ~ ssSkC0
| ~ customer(skc4,X2)
| ~ in(skc4,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc4,X1)
| coffee(skc4,skf12(X3)) ),
c_0_67,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_97,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc15,X1)
| ~ in(skc15,X1,skc17)
| agent(skc15,skf21(X2),skf22(X2))
| ssSkC0 ),
c_0_68,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_98,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc15,X1)
| ~ in(skc15,X1,skc17)
| patient(skc15,skf20(X2),skf22(X2))
| ssSkC0 ),
c_0_69,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_99,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc15,X1)
| ~ in(skc15,X1,skc17)
| patient(skc15,skf21(X2),skc16)
| ssSkC0 ),
c_0_70,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_100,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc15,X1)
| ~ in(skc15,X1,skc17)
| event(skc15,skf21(X2))
| ssSkC0 ),
c_0_71,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_101,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc15,X1)
| ~ in(skc15,X1,skc17)
| past(skc15,skf21(X2))
| ssSkC0 ),
c_0_72,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_102,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc15,X1)
| ~ in(skc15,X1,skc17)
| nonreflexive(skc15,skf21(X2))
| ssSkC0 ),
c_0_73,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_103,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc15,X1)
| ~ in(skc15,X1,skc17)
| drink(skc15,skf21(X2))
| ssSkC0 ),
c_0_74,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_104,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc15,X1)
| ~ in(skc15,X1,skc17)
| human_person(skc15,skf22(X2))
| ssSkC0 ),
c_0_75,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_105,negated_conjecture,
( ~ actual_world(X1)
| in(X1,skf32(X1),skf27(X1))
| ssSkC0 ),
c_0_76,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_106,negated_conjecture,
( ~ actual_world(X1)
| customer(X1,skf32(X1))
| ssSkC0 ),
c_0_77,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_107,negated_conjecture,
( ~ actual_world(X1)
| restaurant(X1,skf27(X1))
| ssSkC0 ),
c_0_78,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_108,negated_conjecture,
( restaurant(skc15,skc17)
| ssSkC0 ),
clause4,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_109,negated_conjecture,
( coffee(skc15,skc16)
| ssSkC0 ),
clause3,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_110,negated_conjecture,
actual_world(skc4),
clause2,
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : NLP097-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.46 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.46 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.46 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.46 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.46 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.46 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.46 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.19/0.46 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:39:25 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.46 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.23/0.52 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/0.56 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.23/0.56 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.56 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.56 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.56 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.56 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.56 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.56 % new_bool_3 with pid 702460 completed with status 1
% 0.23/0.56 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.23/0.56 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.56 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.56 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.56 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.56 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.23/0.56 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.56 % Search class: FGHNF-FFMS31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.56 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.56 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.56 % SubtermCWHack with pid 702468 completed with status 1
% 0.23/0.56 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.23/0.56 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.56 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.56 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.56 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.56 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.23/0.56 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.56 % Search class: FGHNF-FFMS31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.56 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.56 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.56 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.23/0.56
% 0.23/0.56 % No proof found!
% 0.23/0.56 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.23/0.56 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.56 % Parsed axioms : 38
% 0.23/0.56 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/0.56 % Initial clauses : 38
% 0.23/0.56 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/0.56 % Initial clauses in saturation : 38
% 0.23/0.56 % Processed clauses : 40
% 0.23/0.56 % ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.23/0.56 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.56 % ...remaining for further processing : 39
% 0.23/0.56 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/0.56 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/0.56 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.56 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.23/0.56 % Generated clauses : 19
% 0.23/0.56 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.23/0.56 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.56 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 4
% 0.23/0.56 % Paramodulations : 19
% 0.23/0.56 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/0.56 % NegExts : 0
% 0.23/0.56 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/0.56 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.23/0.56 % Total rewrite steps : 18
% 0.23/0.56 % ...of those cached : 16
% 0.23/0.56 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/0.56 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/0.56 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.56 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.56 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.56 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/0.56 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.56 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.56 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.56 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.56 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.56 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.56 % Current number of processed clauses : 39
% 0.23/0.56 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 2
% 0.23/0.56 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.56 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.56 % Non-unit-clauses : 37
% 0.23/0.56 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.56 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.23/0.56 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/0.56 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.56 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 500
% 0.23/0.56 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 75
% 0.23/0.56 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 4
% 0.23/0.56 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/0.56 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/0.56 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.56 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.23/0.56 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.56 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/0.56 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3438
% 0.23/0.56 % Search garbage collected termcells : 191
% 0.23/0.56
% 0.23/0.56 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.56 % User time : 0.010 s
% 0.23/0.56 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.23/0.56 % Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.23/0.56 % Maximum resident set size: 3628 pages
% 0.23/0.56
% 0.23/0.56 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.56 % User time : 0.012 s
% 0.23/0.56 % System time : 0.008 s
% 0.23/0.56 % Total time : 0.019 s
% 0.23/0.56 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.23/0.56 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------