%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Nitpick---2016 % Problem : NLP100+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v2.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % Computer : n012.star.cs.uiowa.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz % Memory : 32218.75MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Tue Jan 17 21:06:58 EST 2017 % Result : CounterSatisfiable 23.91s % Output : FiniteModel 23.91s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.03 % Problem : NLP100+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v2.4.0. % 0.02/0.04 % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % 0.02/0.23 % Computer : n012.star.cs.uiowa.edu % 0.02/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.02/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz % 0.02/0.23 % Memory : 32218.75MB % 0.02/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % 0.02/0.23 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.02/0.23 % DateTime : Sat Jan 14 21:49:03 CST 2017 % 0.02/0.23 % CPUTime : % 23.91/9.63 Nitpicking formula... % 23.91/9.63 Timestamp: 21:49:11 % 23.91/9.63 Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured: % 23.91/9.63 "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light" % 23.91/9.63 Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes: % 23.91/9.63 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1 % 23.91/9.63 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2 % 23.91/9.63 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3 % 23.91/9.63 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4 % 23.91/9.63 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5 % 23.91/9.63 % SZS status CounterSatisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel % 23.91/9.63 Nitpick found a counterexample for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1: % 23.91/9.63 % 23.91/9.63 Skolem constants: % 23.91/9.63 U = i1 % 23.91/9.63 V = i1 % 23.91/9.63 W = i1 % 23.91/9.63 X = i1 % 23.91/9.63 \<lambda>Z. X1 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1) % 23.91/9.63 X2 = i1 % 23.91/9.63 \<lambda>X2. X3 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1) % 23.91/9.63 \<lambda>X2. X4 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1) % 23.91/9.63 \<lambda>X3 X4. X5 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1)) % 23.91/9.63 \<lambda>X3 X4. X6 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1)) % 23.91/9.63 \<lambda>X3 X4. X7 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1)) % 23.91/9.63 \<lambda>X3 X4. X8 = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1)) % 23.91/9.63 Y = i1 % 23.91/9.63 Constants: % 23.91/9.63 bnd_actual_world = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True) % 23.91/9.63 bnd_agent = % 23.91/9.63 (\<lambda>x. _) % 23.91/9.63 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True))) % 23.91/9.63 bnd_coffee = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False)) % 23.91/9.63 bnd_customer = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False)) % 23.91/9.63 bnd_drink = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False)) % 23.91/9.63 bnd_event = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True)) % 23.91/9.63 bnd_human_person = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False)) % 23.91/9.63 bnd_in = % 23.91/9.63 (\<lambda>x. _) % 23.91/9.63 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False))) % 23.91/9.63 bnd_nonreflexive = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True)) % 23.91/9.63 bnd_past = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True)) % 23.91/9.63 bnd_patient = % 23.91/9.63 (\<lambda>x. _) % 23.91/9.63 (i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True))) % 23.91/9.63 bnd_restaurant = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False)) % 23.91/9.63 bnd_see = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := False)) % 23.91/9.63 % SZS output end FiniteModel % 23.91/9.63 Total time: 905 ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------