%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : NLP103-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:34:56 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.25s 0.59s
% Output : Saturation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named clause1ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_42ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
actual_world(skc20),
clause1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_86,negated_conjecture,
ssSkC0,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_71,c_0_72]),c_0_73]),c_0_74]),c_0_75]),c_0_76]),c_0_45]),c_0_77]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_96,negated_conjecture,
actual_world(skc8),
clause2,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_105,negated_conjecture,
( ~ actual_world(X1)
| ~ event(X1,X5)
| ~ event(X1,X2)
| ~ past(X1,X5)
| ~ past(X1,X2)
| ~ nonreflexive(X1,X5)
| ~ nonreflexive(X1,X2)
| ~ drink(X1,X5)
| ~ coffee(X1,X6)
| ~ human_person(X1,X4)
| ~ restaurant(X1,X3)
| ~ patient(X1,X5,X6)
| ~ patient(X1,X2,X4)
| ~ agent(X1,X5,X4)
| ~ agent(X1,X2,skf12(X1,X3,X4))
| ~ see(X1,X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_85,c_0_86])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_106,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(skc8,X1,skc10)
| ~ customer(skc8,X1)
| agent(skc8,skf8(X1),X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_87,c_0_86])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_107,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(skc8,X2,skc10)
| ~ customer(skc8,X2)
| event(skc8,skf8(X1)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_88,c_0_86])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_108,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(skc8,X2,skc10)
| ~ customer(skc8,X2)
| past(skc8,skf8(X1)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_89,c_0_86])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_109,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(skc8,X2,skc10)
| ~ customer(skc8,X2)
| nonreflexive(skc8,skf8(X1)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_90,c_0_86])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_110,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(skc8,X2,skc10)
| ~ customer(skc8,X2)
| see(skc8,skf8(X1)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_91,c_0_86])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_123,negated_conjecture,
( ~ event(skc8,X3)
| ~ past(skc8,X3)
| ~ nonreflexive(skc8,X3)
| ~ drink(skc8,X3)
| ~ coffee(skc8,X4)
| ~ human_person(skc8,X2)
| ~ restaurant(skc8,X1)
| ~ patient(skc8,X3,X4)
| ~ patient(skc8,skf8(skf12(skc8,X1,X2)),X2)
| ~ agent(skc8,X3,X2)
| ~ in(skc8,skf12(skc8,X1,X2),skc10)
| ~ customer(skc8,skf12(skc8,X1,X2)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_105,c_0_106]),c_0_96])]),c_0_107]),c_0_108]),c_0_109]),c_0_110]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_124,negated_conjecture,
( ~ actual_world(X1)
| ~ event(X1,X4)
| ~ past(X1,X4)
| ~ nonreflexive(X1,X4)
| ~ drink(X1,X4)
| ~ coffee(X1,X6)
| ~ human_person(X1,X5)
| ~ restaurant(X1,X2)
| ~ patient(X1,X4,X6)
| ~ agent(X1,X4,X5)
| in(X1,skf12(X1,X2,X3),X2) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_102,c_0_86])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_125,negated_conjecture,
( ~ actual_world(X1)
| ~ event(X1,X4)
| ~ past(X1,X4)
| ~ nonreflexive(X1,X4)
| ~ drink(X1,X4)
| ~ coffee(X1,X6)
| ~ human_person(X1,X5)
| ~ restaurant(X1,X7)
| ~ patient(X1,X4,X6)
| ~ agent(X1,X4,X5)
| customer(X1,skf12(X1,X2,X3)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_95,c_0_86])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_126,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(skc8,X2,skc10)
| ~ customer(skc8,X2)
| patient(skc8,skf8(X1),skf10(X1)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_111,c_0_86])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_127,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(skc8,X2,skc10)
| ~ customer(skc8,X2)
| agent(skc8,skf9(X1),skf10(X1)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_112,c_0_86])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_128,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(skc8,X2,skc10)
| ~ customer(skc8,X2)
| patient(skc8,skf9(X1),skc9) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_113,c_0_86])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_129,negated_conjecture,
( ~ drink(skc8,skf8(X3))
| ~ coffee(skc8,X4)
| ~ human_person(skc8,X3)
| ~ restaurant(skc8,X5)
| ~ patient(skc8,skf8(X3),X4)
| ~ in(skc8,X3,skc10)
| ~ customer(skc8,X3)
| customer(skc8,skf12(skc8,X1,X2)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_114,c_0_86])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_130,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(skc8,X2,skc10)
| ~ customer(skc8,X2)
| event(skc8,skf9(X1)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_115,c_0_86])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_131,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(skc8,X2,skc10)
| ~ customer(skc8,X2)
| past(skc8,skf9(X1)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_116,c_0_86])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_132,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(skc8,X2,skc10)
| ~ customer(skc8,X2)
| nonreflexive(skc8,skf9(X1)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_117,c_0_86])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_133,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(skc8,X2,skc10)
| ~ customer(skc8,X2)
| drink(skc8,skf9(X1)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_118,c_0_86])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_134,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in(skc8,X2,skc10)
| ~ customer(skc8,X2)
| human_person(skc8,skf10(X1)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_119,c_0_86])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_135,negated_conjecture,
( ~ drink(skc8,skf8(X3))
| ~ coffee(skc8,X4)
| ~ human_person(skc8,X3)
| ~ restaurant(skc8,X1)
| ~ patient(skc8,skf8(X3),X4)
| ~ in(skc8,X3,skc10)
| ~ customer(skc8,X3)
| in(skc8,skf12(skc8,X1,X2),X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_120,c_0_86])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_136,negated_conjecture,
coffee(skc8,skc9),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_121,c_0_86])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_137,negated_conjecture,
restaurant(skc8,skc10),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_122,c_0_86])]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : NLP103-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.21/0.46 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.21/0.46 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.21/0.46 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.21/0.46 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.21/0.46 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.21/0.46 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.21/0.46 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.21/0.46 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:39:06 UTC 2026
% 0.21/0.47 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.47 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.25/0.53 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.25/0.53 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/0.59 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.25/0.59 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.59 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.59 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.59 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.59 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.59 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.59 % new_bool_3 with pid 3885764 completed with status 1
% 0.25/0.59 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.25/0.59 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.59 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.59 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.59 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.59 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.25/0.59 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.25/0.59 % Search class: FGHNF-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.25/0.59 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.25/0.59 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.59 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3885772 completed with status 1
% 0.25/0.59 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.25/0.59 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.25/0.59 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.25/0.59 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.25/0.59 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.59 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.25/0.59 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.25/0.59 % Search class: FGHNF-FFMM31-SFFFFFNN
% 0.25/0.59 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.25/0.59 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.25/0.59 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.25/0.59
% 0.25/0.59 % No proof found!
% 0.25/0.59 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.25/0.59 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.25/0.59 % Parsed axioms : 38
% 0.25/0.59 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.25/0.59 % Initial clauses : 38
% 0.25/0.59 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.25/0.59 % Initial clauses in saturation : 38
% 0.25/0.59 % Processed clauses : 75
% 0.25/0.59 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.25/0.59 % ...subsumed : 2
% 0.25/0.59 % ...remaining for further processing : 73
% 0.25/0.59 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.25/0.59 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/0.59 % Backward-subsumed : 7
% 0.25/0.59 % Backward-rewritten : 42
% 0.25/0.59 % Generated clauses : 27
% 0.25/0.59 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 41
% 0.25/0.59 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.25/0.59 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 33
% 0.25/0.59 % Paramodulations : 27
% 0.25/0.59 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/0.59 % NegExts : 0
% 0.25/0.59 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.25/0.59 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.25/0.59 % Total rewrite steps : 59
% 0.25/0.59 % ...of those cached : 56
% 0.25/0.59 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.25/0.59 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.25/0.59 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.25/0.59 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.59 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.25/0.59 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.25/0.59 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.59 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.59 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.59 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.59 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.59 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.25/0.59 % Current number of processed clauses : 24
% 0.25/0.59 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.25/0.59 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/0.59 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.25/0.59 % Non-unit-clauses : 19
% 0.25/0.59 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.25/0.59 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.25/0.59 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/0.59 % Current number of archived clauses : 49
% 0.25/0.59 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1395
% 0.25/0.59 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 412
% 0.25/0.59 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 42
% 0.25/0.59 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/0.59 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/0.59 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.25/0.59 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.25/0.59 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/0.59 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/0.59 % Termbank termtop insertions : 4299
% 0.25/0.59 % Search garbage collected termcells : 186
% 0.25/0.59
% 0.25/0.59 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.59 % User time : 0.013 s
% 0.25/0.59 % System time : 0.001 s
% 0.25/0.59 % Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.25/0.59 % Maximum resident set size: 3680 pages
% 0.25/0.59
% 0.25/0.59 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/0.59 % User time : 0.015 s
% 0.25/0.59 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.25/0.59 % Total time : 0.023 s
% 0.25/0.59 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.25/0.59 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------