%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : NLP104-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:34:56 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.27s 0.67s
% Output : Saturation 0.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_92ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_129ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_55,plain,
( ~ animate(X1,X2)
| ~ nonliving(X1,X2) ),
c_0_49,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_56,plain,
( ~ human_person(X1,X2)
| animate(X1,X2) ),
c_0_50,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_60,plain,
( ~ existent(X1,X2)
| ~ nonexistent(X1,X2) ),
c_0_51,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_61,plain,
( ~ entity(X1,X2)
| existent(X1,X2) ),
c_0_52,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_63,plain,
( ~ organism(X1,X2)
| entity(X1,X2) ),
c_0_53,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_64,plain,
( ~ human_person(X1,X2)
| organism(X1,X2) ),
c_0_54,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_66,plain,
( ~ nonliving(X1,X2)
| ~ human_person(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_56]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_67,plain,
( ~ object(X1,X2)
| nonliving(X1,X2) ),
c_0_57,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_69,plain,
( ~ building(X1,X2)
| artifact(X1,X2) ),
c_0_58,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_70,plain,
( ~ restaurant(X1,X2)
| building(X1,X2) ),
c_0_59,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_71,plain,
( ~ nonexistent(X1,X2)
| ~ entity(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_61]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_72,plain,
( ~ eventuality(X1,X2)
| nonexistent(X1,X2) ),
c_0_62,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_73,plain,
( ~ human_person(X1,X2)
| entity(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_64]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_74,plain,
( ~ customer(X1,X2)
| human_person(X1,X2) ),
c_0_65,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_80,plain,
( ~ object(X1,X2)
| ~ human_person(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_66,c_0_67]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_81,plain,
( ~ artifact(X1,X2)
| object(X1,X2) ),
c_0_68,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_82,plain,
( ~ restaurant(X1,X2)
| artifact(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_69,c_0_70]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_83,plain,
( ~ eventuality(X1,X2)
| ~ entity(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_71,c_0_72]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_84,plain,
( ~ customer(X1,X2)
| entity(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_73,c_0_74]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_86,plain,
( ~ object(X1,X2)
| entity(X1,X2) ),
c_0_75,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_87,plain,
( ~ nonliving(X1,X2)
| ~ living(X1,X2) ),
c_0_76,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_88,plain,
( ~ organism(X1,X2)
| living(X1,X2) ),
c_0_77,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_89,plain,
( ~ substance_matter(X1,X2)
| object(X1,X2) ),
c_0_78,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_90,plain,
( ~ food(X1,X2)
| substance_matter(X1,X2) ),
c_0_79,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_107,plain,
( ~ object(X1,X2)
| ~ customer(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_80,c_0_74]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_108,plain,
( ~ restaurant(X1,X2)
| object(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_81,c_0_82]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_109,plain,
( ~ eventuality(X1,X2)
| ~ customer(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_83,c_0_84]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_110,plain,
( ~ event(X1,X2)
| eventuality(X1,X2) ),
c_0_85,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_111,plain,
( ~ eventuality(X1,X2)
| ~ object(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_83,c_0_86]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_112,plain,
( ~ nonliving(X1,X2)
| ~ organism(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_87,c_0_88]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_114,plain,
( ~ food(X1,X2)
| object(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_89,c_0_90]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_115,plain,
( ~ beverage(X1,X2)
| food(X1,X2) ),
c_0_91,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_129,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc1,X2)
| ~ in(skc1,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc1,X1)
| agent(skc1,skf5(X3),skf7(X3)) ),
c_0_92,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_130,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc1,X2)
| ~ in(skc1,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc1,X1)
| patient(skc1,skf4(X3),skf7(X3)) ),
c_0_93,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_131,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc1,X2)
| ~ in(skc1,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc1,X1)
| patient(skc1,skf5(X3),skf6(X3)) ),
c_0_94,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_132,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc1,X2)
| ~ in(skc1,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc1,X1)
| agent(skc1,skf4(X2),X2) ),
c_0_95,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_133,plain,
( ~ agent(X1,X2,X4)
| ~ patient(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ drink(X1,X2)
| beverage(X1,X3) ),
c_0_96,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_134,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc1,X2)
| ~ in(skc1,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc1,X1)
| past(skc1,skf4(X3)) ),
c_0_97,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_135,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc1,X2)
| ~ in(skc1,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc1,X1)
| past(skc1,skf5(X3)) ),
c_0_98,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_136,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc1,X2)
| ~ in(skc1,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc1,X1)
| nonreflexive(skc1,skf4(X3)) ),
c_0_99,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_137,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc1,X2)
| ~ in(skc1,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc1,X1)
| nonreflexive(skc1,skf5(X3)) ),
c_0_100,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_138,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc1,X2)
| ~ in(skc1,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc1,X1)
| human_person(skc1,skf7(X3)) ),
c_0_101,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_139,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc1,X2)
| ~ in(skc1,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc1,X1)
| coffee(skc1,skf6(X3)) ),
c_0_102,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_140,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc1,X2)
| ~ in(skc1,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc1,X1)
| drink(skc1,skf5(X3)) ),
c_0_103,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_141,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc1,X2)
| ~ in(skc1,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc1,X1)
| event(skc1,skf4(X3)) ),
c_0_104,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_142,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc1,X2)
| ~ in(skc1,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc1,X1)
| event(skc1,skf5(X3)) ),
c_0_105,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_143,plain,
( ~ agent(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ patient(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ nonreflexive(X1,X2) ),
c_0_106,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_144,plain,
( ~ customer(X1,X2)
| ~ restaurant(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_107,c_0_108]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_145,plain,
( ~ event(X1,X2)
| ~ customer(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_109,c_0_110]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_146,plain,
( ~ event(X1,X2)
| ~ object(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_111,c_0_110]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_147,plain,
( ~ object(X1,X2)
| ~ organism(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_112,c_0_67]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_148,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc1,X2)
| ~ in(skc1,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc1,X1)
| see(skc1,skf4(X3)) ),
c_0_113,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_149,plain,
( ~ beverage(X1,X2)
| object(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_114,c_0_115]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_150,plain,
( ~ human_person(X1,X2)
| human(X1,X2) ),
c_0_116,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_151,plain,
( ~ organism(X1,X2)
| impartial(X1,X2) ),
c_0_117,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_152,plain,
( ~ object(X1,X2)
| impartial(X1,X2) ),
c_0_118,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_153,plain,
( ~ coffee(X1,X2)
| beverage(X1,X2) ),
c_0_119,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_154,plain,
( ~ object(X1,X2)
| unisex(X1,X2) ),
c_0_120,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_155,plain,
( ~ eventuality(X1,X2)
| unisex(X1,X2) ),
c_0_121,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_156,plain,
( ~ entity(X1,X2)
| specific(X1,X2) ),
c_0_122,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_157,plain,
( ~ eventuality(X1,X2)
| specific(X1,X2) ),
c_0_123,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_158,plain,
( ~ thing(X1,X2)
| singleton(X1,X2) ),
c_0_124,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_159,plain,
( ~ entity(X1,X2)
| thing(X1,X2) ),
c_0_125,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_160,plain,
( ~ eventuality(X1,X2)
| thing(X1,X2) ),
c_0_126,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_161,plain,
( ~ drink(X1,X2)
| event(X1,X2) ),
c_0_127,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_162,plain,
( ~ see(X1,X2)
| event(X1,X2) ),
c_0_128,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_163,negated_conjecture,
actual_world(skc1),
clause35,
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : NLP104-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.17/0.48 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.48 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.48 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.48 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.48 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.48 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.48 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.17/0.48 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:42:22 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.49 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.49 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.21/0.57 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.57 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/0.67 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.27/0.67 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/0.67 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.67 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.67 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.67 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.67 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.67 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 1094768 completed with status 1
% 0.27/0.67 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.27/0.67 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/0.67 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.67 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.67 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.27/0.67 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.27/0.67 % Search class: FHHNF-FFMF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.27/0.67 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.27/0.67 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.67 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.67 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.67 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.67 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.67 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1094772 completed with status 1
% 0.27/0.67 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.27/0.67 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/0.67 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.67 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.67 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.27/0.67 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.27/0.67 % Search class: FHHNF-FFMF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.27/0.67 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.27/0.67 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.67 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.27/0.67
% 0.27/0.67 % No proof found!
% 0.27/0.67 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.27/0.67 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.27/0.67 % Parsed axioms : 49
% 0.27/0.67 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.27/0.67 % Initial clauses : 49
% 0.27/0.67 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.27/0.67 % Initial clauses in saturation : 49
% 0.27/0.67 % Processed clauses : 68
% 0.27/0.67 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.27/0.67 % ...subsumed : 1
% 0.27/0.67 % ...remaining for further processing : 67
% 0.27/0.67 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.27/0.67 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.27/0.67 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.27/0.67 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.27/0.67 % Generated clauses : 19
% 0.27/0.67 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 19
% 0.27/0.67 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.27/0.67 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.27/0.67 % Paramodulations : 19
% 0.27/0.67 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.27/0.67 % NegExts : 0
% 0.27/0.67 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.27/0.67 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.27/0.67 % Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.27/0.67 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.27/0.67 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.27/0.67 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.27/0.67 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.27/0.67 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.27/0.67 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.27/0.67 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.27/0.67 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.67 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.67 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.67 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.67 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.67 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.67 % Current number of processed clauses : 67
% 0.27/0.67 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.27/0.67 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/0.67 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.27/0.67 % Non-unit-clauses : 66
% 0.27/0.67 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.27/0.67 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.27/0.67 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.27/0.67 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.27/0.67 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1931
% 0.27/0.67 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1482
% 0.27/0.67 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.27/0.67 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.27/0.67 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.27/0.67 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.27/0.67 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.27/0.67 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.27/0.67 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.27/0.67 % Termbank termtop insertions : 2108
% 0.27/0.67 % Search garbage collected termcells : 120
% 0.27/0.67
% 0.27/0.67 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.67 % User time : 0.009 s
% 0.27/0.67 % System time : 0.005 s
% 0.27/0.67 % Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.27/0.67 % Maximum resident set size: 3668 pages
% 0.27/0.67
% 0.27/0.67 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.67 % User time : 0.044 s
% 0.27/0.67 % System time : 0.015 s
% 0.27/0.67 % Total time : 0.059 s
% 0.27/0.67 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.27/0.67 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------