↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.SAT-Sat.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : NLP104-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:37:19 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.13s 0.42s
% Output   : Saturation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_49ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_97ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_97,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ customer(skc1,X2)
    | ~ in(skc1,X2,X1)
    | ~ restaurant(skc1,X1)
    | agent(skc1,skf5(X3),skf7(X3)) ),
    c_0_49,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_98,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ customer(skc1,X2)
    | ~ in(skc1,X2,X1)
    | ~ restaurant(skc1,X1)
    | patient(skc1,skf4(X3),skf7(X3)) ),
    c_0_50,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_99,plain,
    ( ~ agent(X1,X2,X4)
    | ~ patient(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ drink(X1,X2)
    | beverage(X1,X3) ),
    c_0_51,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_100,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ customer(skc1,X2)
    | ~ in(skc1,X2,X1)
    | ~ restaurant(skc1,X1)
    | patient(skc1,skf5(X3),skf6(X3)) ),
    c_0_52,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_101,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ customer(skc1,X2)
    | ~ in(skc1,X2,X1)
    | ~ restaurant(skc1,X1)
    | agent(skc1,skf4(X2),X2) ),
    c_0_53,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_102,plain,
    ( ~ agent(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ patient(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ nonreflexive(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_54,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_103,plain,
    ( ~ organism(X1,X2)
    | living(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_55,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_104,plain,
    ( ~ organism(X1,X2)
    | impartial(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_56,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_105,plain,
    ( ~ object(X1,X2)
    | impartial(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_57,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_106,plain,
    ( ~ object(X1,X2)
    | nonliving(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_58,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_107,plain,
    ( ~ entity(X1,X2)
    | existent(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_59,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_108,plain,
    ( ~ object(X1,X2)
    | entity(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_60,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_109,plain,
    ( ~ food(X1,X2)
    | substance_matter(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_61,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_110,plain,
    ( ~ beverage(X1,X2)
    | food(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_62,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_111,plain,
    ( ~ object(X1,X2)
    | unisex(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_63,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_112,plain,
    ( ~ eventuality(X1,X2)
    | unisex(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_64,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_113,plain,
    ( ~ eventuality(X1,X2)
    | nonexistent(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_65,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_114,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ customer(skc1,X2)
    | ~ in(skc1,X2,X1)
    | ~ restaurant(skc1,X1)
    | past(skc1,skf4(X3)) ),
    c_0_66,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_115,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ customer(skc1,X2)
    | ~ in(skc1,X2,X1)
    | ~ restaurant(skc1,X1)
    | past(skc1,skf5(X3)) ),
    c_0_67,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_116,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ customer(skc1,X2)
    | ~ in(skc1,X2,X1)
    | ~ restaurant(skc1,X1)
    | nonreflexive(skc1,skf4(X3)) ),
    c_0_68,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_117,plain,
    ( ~ entity(X1,X2)
    | specific(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_69,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_118,plain,
    ( ~ restaurant(X1,X2)
    | building(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_70,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_119,plain,
    ( ~ eventuality(X1,X2)
    | specific(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_71,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_120,plain,
    ( ~ thing(X1,X2)
    | singleton(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_72,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_121,plain,
    ( ~ entity(X1,X2)
    | thing(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_73,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_122,plain,
    ( ~ human_person(X1,X2)
    | animate(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_74,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_123,plain,
    ( ~ eventuality(X1,X2)
    | thing(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_75,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_124,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ customer(skc1,X2)
    | ~ in(skc1,X2,X1)
    | ~ restaurant(skc1,X1)
    | nonreflexive(skc1,skf5(X3)) ),
    c_0_76,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_125,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ customer(skc1,X2)
    | ~ in(skc1,X2,X1)
    | ~ restaurant(skc1,X1)
    | human_person(skc1,skf7(X3)) ),
    c_0_77,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_126,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ customer(skc1,X2)
    | ~ in(skc1,X2,X1)
    | ~ restaurant(skc1,X1)
    | coffee(skc1,skf6(X3)) ),
    c_0_78,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_127,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ customer(skc1,X2)
    | ~ in(skc1,X2,X1)
    | ~ restaurant(skc1,X1)
    | drink(skc1,skf5(X3)) ),
    c_0_79,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_128,plain,
    ( ~ human_person(X1,X2)
    | human(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_80,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_129,plain,
    ( ~ building(X1,X2)
    | artifact(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_81,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_130,plain,
    ( ~ organism(X1,X2)
    | entity(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_82,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_131,plain,
    ( ~ artifact(X1,X2)
    | object(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_83,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_132,plain,
    ( ~ substance_matter(X1,X2)
    | object(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_84,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_133,plain,
    ( ~ human_person(X1,X2)
    | organism(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_85,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_134,plain,
    ( ~ event(X1,X2)
    | eventuality(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_86,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_135,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ customer(skc1,X2)
    | ~ in(skc1,X2,X1)
    | ~ restaurant(skc1,X1)
    | event(skc1,skf4(X3)) ),
    c_0_87,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_136,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ customer(skc1,X2)
    | ~ in(skc1,X2,X1)
    | ~ restaurant(skc1,X1)
    | event(skc1,skf5(X3)) ),
    c_0_88,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_137,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ customer(skc1,X2)
    | ~ in(skc1,X2,X1)
    | ~ restaurant(skc1,X1)
    | see(skc1,skf4(X3)) ),
    c_0_89,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_138,plain,
    ( ~ coffee(X1,X2)
    | beverage(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_90,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_139,plain,
    ( ~ customer(X1,X2)
    | human_person(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_91,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_140,plain,
    ( ~ drink(X1,X2)
    | event(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_92,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_141,plain,
    ( ~ animate(X1,X2)
    | ~ nonliving(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_93,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_142,plain,
    ( ~ nonliving(X1,X2)
    | ~ living(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_94,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_143,plain,
    ( ~ existent(X1,X2)
    | ~ nonexistent(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_95,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_144,plain,
    ( ~ see(X1,X2)
    | event(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_96,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_145,negated_conjecture,
    actual_world(skc1),
    clause35,
    [final] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : NLP104-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:39:42 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.42  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.42  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.42  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.42  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.42  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 583320 completed with status 1
% 0.13/0.42  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.13/0.42  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.42  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.42  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.42  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.42  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.42  % Search class: FHHNF-FFMF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.42  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.42  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42  % new_bool_1 with pid 583328 completed with status 1
% 0.13/0.42  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.13/0.42  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.42  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.42  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.42  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.42  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.42  % Search class: FHHNF-FFMF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.42  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.42  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.42  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.42  
% 0.13/0.42  % No proof found!
% 0.13/0.42  % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.13/0.42  % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.42  % Parsed axioms                        : 49
% 0.13/0.42  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Initial clauses                      : 49
% 0.13/0.42  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 49
% 0.13/0.42  % Processed clauses                    : 98
% 0.13/0.42  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % ...remaining for further processing  : 98
% 0.13/0.42  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Total rewrite steps                  : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.13/0.42  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.13/0.42  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.42  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.13/0.42  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.42  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.13/0.42  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.13/0.42  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.13/0.42  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.13/0.42  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.13/0.42  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.13/0.42  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.13/0.42  % Current number of processed clauses  : 49
% 0.13/0.42  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 0.13/0.42  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.42  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.13/0.42  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 48
% 0.13/0.42  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.42  % ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Current number of archived clauses   : 49
% 0.13/0.42  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1959
% 0.13/0.42  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1385
% 0.13/0.42  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.13/0.42  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 2376
% 0.13/0.42  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 120
% 0.13/0.42  
% 0.13/0.42  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.42  % User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.13/0.42  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.13/0.42  % Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.13/0.42  % Maximum resident set size: 3668 pages
% 0.13/0.42  
% 0.13/0.42  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.42  % User time                : 0.020 s
% 0.13/0.42  % System time              : 0.013 s
% 0.13/0.42  % Total time               : 0.032 s
% 0.13/0.42  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.13/0.42  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------