%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : NLP110-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:34:58 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.13s 0.42s
% Output : Saturation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_58ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_138ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
( ~ existent(X1,X2)
| ~ nonexistent(X1,X2) ),
c_0_49,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
( ~ entity(X1,X2)
| existent(X1,X2) ),
c_0_50,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_60,plain,
( ~ nonexistent(X1,X2)
| ~ entity(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_61,plain,
( ~ eventuality(X1,X2)
| nonexistent(X1,X2) ),
c_0_53,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_62,plain,
( ~ organism(X1,X2)
| entity(X1,X2) ),
c_0_54,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_63,plain,
( ~ human_person(X1,X2)
| organism(X1,X2) ),
c_0_55,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_65,plain,
( ~ animate(X1,X2)
| ~ nonliving(X1,X2) ),
c_0_56,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_66,plain,
( ~ human_person(X1,X2)
| animate(X1,X2) ),
c_0_57,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_70,plain,
( ~ substance_matter(X1,X2)
| object(X1,X2) ),
c_0_58,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_71,plain,
( ~ food(X1,X2)
| substance_matter(X1,X2) ),
c_0_59,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_74,plain,
( ~ eventuality(X1,X2)
| ~ entity(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_60,c_0_61]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_75,plain,
( ~ human_person(X1,X2)
| entity(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_62,c_0_63]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_77,plain,
( ~ object(X1,X2)
| entity(X1,X2) ),
c_0_64,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_81,plain,
( ~ nonliving(X1,X2)
| ~ human_person(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_65,c_0_66]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_82,plain,
( ~ object(X1,X2)
| nonliving(X1,X2) ),
c_0_67,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_85,plain,
( ~ building(X1,X2)
| artifact(X1,X2) ),
c_0_68,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_86,plain,
( ~ restaurant(X1,X2)
| building(X1,X2) ),
c_0_69,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_87,plain,
( ~ food(X1,X2)
| object(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_70,c_0_71]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_88,plain,
( ~ beverage(X1,X2)
| food(X1,X2) ),
c_0_72,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_89,plain,
( ~ coffee(X1,X2)
| beverage(X1,X2) ),
c_0_73,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_90,negated_conjecture,
coffee(skc4,skc8),
clause36,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_91,plain,
( ~ eventuality(X1,X2)
| ~ human_person(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_74,c_0_75]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_92,plain,
( ~ event(X1,X2)
| eventuality(X1,X2) ),
c_0_76,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_93,plain,
( ~ eventuality(X1,X2)
| ~ object(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_74,c_0_77]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_94,plain,
( ~ agent(X1,X2,X4)
| ~ patient(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ drink(X1,X2)
| beverage(X1,X3) ),
c_0_78,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_95,negated_conjecture,
agent(skc4,skc5,skc6),
clause42,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_96,negated_conjecture,
drink(skc4,skc5),
clause41,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_97,plain,
( ~ nonliving(X1,X2)
| ~ living(X1,X2) ),
c_0_79,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_98,plain,
( ~ organism(X1,X2)
| living(X1,X2) ),
c_0_80,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_99,plain,
( ~ object(X1,X2)
| ~ human_person(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_81,c_0_82]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_100,plain,
( ~ customer(X1,X2)
| human_person(X1,X2) ),
c_0_83,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_101,plain,
( ~ artifact(X1,X2)
| object(X1,X2) ),
c_0_84,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_102,plain,
( ~ restaurant(X1,X2)
| artifact(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_85,c_0_86]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_103,plain,
( ~ beverage(X1,X2)
| object(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_87,c_0_88]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_104,negated_conjecture,
beverage(skc4,skc8),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_89,c_0_90]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_106,negated_conjecture,
human_person(skc4,skc6),
clause37,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_107,plain,
( ~ event(X1,X2)
| ~ human_person(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_91,c_0_92]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_108,plain,
( ~ event(X1,X2)
| ~ object(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_93,c_0_92]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_109,negated_conjecture,
event(skc4,skc5),
clause38,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_110,negated_conjecture,
( ~ patient(skc4,skc5,X1)
| beverage(skc4,X1) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_94,c_0_95]),c_0_96])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_112,plain,
( ~ nonliving(X1,X2)
| ~ organism(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_97,c_0_98]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_114,plain,
( ~ object(X1,X2)
| ~ customer(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_99,c_0_100]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_115,plain,
( ~ restaurant(X1,X2)
| object(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_101,c_0_102]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_132,negated_conjecture,
object(skc4,skc8),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_103,c_0_104]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_133,plain,
( ~ agent(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ patient(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ nonreflexive(X1,X2) ),
c_0_105,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_134,negated_conjecture,
nonreflexive(skc4,skc5),
clause40,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_135,negated_conjecture,
~ object(skc4,skc6),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_99,c_0_106]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_136,plain,
( ~ event(X1,X2)
| ~ customer(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_107,c_0_100]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_137,negated_conjecture,
~ object(skc4,skc5),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_108,c_0_109]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_138,negated_conjecture,
( ~ patient(skc4,skc5,X1)
| object(skc4,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_103,c_0_110]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_139,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc4,X2)
| ~ in(skc4,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc4,X1)
| agent(skc4,skf1(X2),X2) ),
c_0_111,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_140,plain,
( ~ object(X1,X2)
| ~ organism(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_112,c_0_82]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_141,plain,
( ~ organism(X1,X2)
| impartial(X1,X2) ),
c_0_113,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_142,plain,
( ~ customer(X1,X2)
| ~ restaurant(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_114,c_0_115]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_143,plain,
( ~ object(X1,X2)
| impartial(X1,X2) ),
c_0_116,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_144,plain,
( ~ object(X1,X2)
| unisex(X1,X2) ),
c_0_117,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_145,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc4,X2)
| ~ in(skc4,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc4,X1)
| patient(skc4,skf1(X3),skc6) ),
c_0_118,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_146,plain,
( ~ eventuality(X1,X2)
| unisex(X1,X2) ),
c_0_119,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_147,plain,
( ~ entity(X1,X2)
| specific(X1,X2) ),
c_0_120,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_148,plain,
( ~ eventuality(X1,X2)
| specific(X1,X2) ),
c_0_121,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_149,plain,
( ~ thing(X1,X2)
| singleton(X1,X2) ),
c_0_122,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_150,plain,
( ~ entity(X1,X2)
| thing(X1,X2) ),
c_0_123,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_151,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc4,X2)
| ~ in(skc4,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc4,X1)
| past(skc4,skf1(X3)) ),
c_0_124,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_152,plain,
( ~ eventuality(X1,X2)
| thing(X1,X2) ),
c_0_125,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_153,plain,
( ~ human_person(X1,X2)
| human(X1,X2) ),
c_0_126,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_154,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc4,X2)
| ~ in(skc4,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc4,X1)
| nonreflexive(skc4,skf1(X3)) ),
c_0_127,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_155,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc4,X2)
| ~ in(skc4,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc4,X1)
| event(skc4,skf1(X3)) ),
c_0_128,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_156,negated_conjecture,
( ~ customer(skc4,X2)
| ~ in(skc4,X2,X1)
| ~ restaurant(skc4,X1)
| see(skc4,skf1(X3)) ),
c_0_129,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_157,plain,
( ~ drink(X1,X2)
| event(X1,X2) ),
c_0_130,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_158,plain,
( ~ see(X1,X2)
| event(X1,X2) ),
c_0_131,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_159,negated_conjecture,
~ customer(skc4,skc8),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_114,c_0_132]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_160,negated_conjecture,
~ patient(skc4,skc5,skc6),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_133,c_0_95]),c_0_134])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_161,negated_conjecture,
~ restaurant(skc4,skc6),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_135,c_0_115]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_162,negated_conjecture,
~ customer(skc4,skc5),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_136,c_0_109]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_163,negated_conjecture,
~ event(skc4,skc6),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_107,c_0_106]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_164,negated_conjecture,
~ restaurant(skc4,skc5),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_137,c_0_115]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_165,negated_conjecture,
patient(skc4,skc5,skc8),
clause43,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_166,negated_conjecture,
past(skc4,skc5),
clause39,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_167,negated_conjecture,
actual_world(skc4),
clause35,
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : NLP110-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:38:36 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.42 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.13/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 4093414 completed with status 1
% 0.13/0.42 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.13/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.42 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.42 % Search class: FHHNF-FFMM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.42 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 4093422 completed with status 1
% 0.13/0.42 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.13/0.42 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.42 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.13/0.42 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.42 % Search class: FHHNF-FFMM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.42 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.42 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.42 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.42
% 0.13/0.42 % No proof found!
% 0.13/0.42 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.13/0.42 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.42 % Parsed axioms : 49
% 0.13/0.42 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Initial clauses : 49
% 0.13/0.42 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Initial clauses in saturation : 49
% 0.13/0.42 % Processed clauses : 129
% 0.13/0.42 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % ...subsumed : 1
% 0.13/0.42 % ...remaining for further processing : 128
% 0.13/0.42 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Generated clauses : 33
% 0.13/0.42 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 31
% 0.13/0.42 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Paramodulations : 33
% 0.13/0.42 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % NegExts : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Total rewrite steps : 4
% 0.13/0.42 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.42 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.42 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.42 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.42 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.42 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.42 % Current number of processed clauses : 79
% 0.13/0.42 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 11
% 0.13/0.42 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Negative unit clauses : 8
% 0.13/0.42 % Non-unit-clauses : 60
% 0.13/0.42 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.42 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Current number of archived clauses : 49
% 0.13/0.42 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1553
% 0.13/0.42 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1189
% 0.13/0.42 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.13/0.42 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 55
% 0.13/0.42 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.13/0.42 % Termbank termtop insertions : 2029
% 0.13/0.42 % Search garbage collected termcells : 96
% 0.13/0.42
% 0.13/0.42 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.42 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.13/0.42 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.13/0.42 % Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.13/0.42 % Maximum resident set size: 3664 pages
% 0.13/0.42
% 0.13/0.42 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.42 % User time : 0.021 s
% 0.13/0.42 % System time : 0.011 s
% 0.13/0.42 % Total time : 0.032 s
% 0.13/0.42 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.13/0.42 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------