%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : NLP118-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:35:03 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.14s 0.43s
% Output : Saturation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named clause2ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_45ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
actual_world(skc11),
clause2,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_75,negated_conjecture,
~ ssSkC0,
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_67,c_0_68]),c_0_69]),c_0_70]),c_0_71]),c_0_72]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_81,negated_conjecture,
( ~ actual_world(X1)
| ~ chevy(X1,X5)
| ~ white(X1,X5)
| ~ dirty(X1,X5)
| ~ old(X1,X5)
| ~ agent(X1,X3,X5)
| ~ barrel(X1,X3)
| ~ present(X1,X3)
| ~ event(X1,X3)
| ~ of(X1,X4,X2)
| ~ hollywood_placename(X1,X4)
| ~ placename(X1,X4)
| ~ in(X1,X3,X2)
| ~ down(X1,X3,X2)
| ~ lonely(X1,X2)
| ~ street(X1,X2)
| ~ city(X1,X2)
| ssSkC0 ),
c_0_73,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_82,negated_conjecture,
down(skc16,skc17,skc18),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_74,c_0_75]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_83,negated_conjecture,
lonely(skc16,skc18),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_76,c_0_75]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_84,negated_conjecture,
street(skc16,skc18),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_77,c_0_75]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_85,negated_conjecture,
event(skc16,skc17),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_78,c_0_75]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_86,negated_conjecture,
present(skc16,skc17),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_79,c_0_75]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_87,negated_conjecture,
barrel(skc16,skc17),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_80,c_0_75]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_88,negated_conjecture,
actual_world(skc16),
clause1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_99,negated_conjecture,
( ~ old(skc16,X2)
| ~ dirty(skc16,X2)
| ~ white(skc16,X2)
| ~ chevy(skc16,X2)
| ~ hollywood_placename(skc16,X1)
| ~ placename(skc16,X1)
| ~ city(skc16,skc18)
| ~ agent(skc16,skc17,X2)
| ~ in(skc16,skc17,skc18)
| ~ of(skc16,X1,skc18) ),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_81,c_0_82]),c_0_83]),c_0_84]),c_0_85]),c_0_86]),c_0_87]),c_0_88])]),c_0_75]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_100,negated_conjecture,
of(skc16,skc19,skc20),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_89,c_0_75]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_101,negated_conjecture,
in(skc16,skc17,skc20),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_90,c_0_75]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_102,negated_conjecture,
agent(skc16,skc17,skc21),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_91,c_0_75]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_103,negated_conjecture,
city(skc16,skc20),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_92,c_0_75]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_104,negated_conjecture,
placename(skc16,skc19),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_93,c_0_75]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_105,negated_conjecture,
hollywood_placename(skc16,skc19),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_94,c_0_75]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_106,negated_conjecture,
chevy(skc16,skc21),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_95,c_0_75]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_107,negated_conjecture,
white(skc16,skc21),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_96,c_0_75]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_108,negated_conjecture,
dirty(skc16,skc21),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_97,c_0_75]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_109,negated_conjecture,
old(skc16,skc21),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_98,c_0_75]),
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : NLP118-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:43:13 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.43 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % new_bool_3 with pid 703941 completed with status 1
% 0.14/0.43 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.14/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.43 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.43 % Search class: FGHNF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.43 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % SubtermCWHack with pid 703946 completed with status 1
% 0.14/0.43 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/0.43 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.43 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.43 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.43 % Search class: FGHNF-FFMM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.43 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.43 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.43 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.43
% 0.14/0.43 % No proof found!
% 0.14/0.43 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.14/0.43 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.43 % Parsed axioms : 36
% 0.14/0.43 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Initial clauses : 36
% 0.14/0.43 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Initial clauses in saturation : 36
% 0.14/0.43 % Processed clauses : 58
% 0.14/0.43 % ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.14/0.43 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % ...remaining for further processing : 57
% 0.14/0.43 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Backward-subsumed : 20
% 0.14/0.43 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Generated clauses : 23
% 0.14/0.43 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 23
% 0.14/0.43 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 18
% 0.14/0.43 % Paramodulations : 7
% 0.14/0.43 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Total rewrite steps : 10
% 0.14/0.43 % ...of those cached : 3
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.43 % Current number of processed clauses : 21
% 0.14/0.43 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 18
% 0.14/0.43 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.14/0.43 % Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.14/0.43 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.43 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Current number of archived clauses : 36
% 0.14/0.43 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 203
% 0.14/0.43 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 98
% 0.14/0.43 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 20
% 0.14/0.43 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19
% 0.14/0.43 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.14/0.43 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.43 % Termbank termtop insertions : 1733
% 0.14/0.43 % Search garbage collected termcells : 113
% 0.14/0.43
% 0.14/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.43 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.43 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.43 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.14/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 3664 pages
% 0.14/0.43
% 0.14/0.43 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.43 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.43 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.14/0.43 % Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.14/0.43 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.14/0.43 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------