↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.SAT-Sat.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : NLP136-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:37:42 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Satisfiable 0.08s 0.44s
% Output   : Saturation 0.08s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named clause2ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_63ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_63,negated_conjecture,
    actual_world(skc13),
    clause2,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_111,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ssSkC0,
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_108,c_0_104]),c_0_102]),c_0_103]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_120,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ actual_world(X1)
    | ~ ssSkP0(X6,X1)
    | ~ two(X1,X6)
    | ~ group(X1,X6)
    | ~ placename(X1,X5)
    | ~ hollywood_placename(X1,X5)
    | ~ of(X1,X5,X4)
    | ~ city(X1,X4)
    | ~ street(X1,X4)
    | ~ lonely(X1,X4)
    | ~ down(X1,X2,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X2,X4)
    | ~ chevy(X1,X3)
    | ~ white(X1,X3)
    | ~ dirty(X1,X3)
    | ~ old(X1,X3)
    | ~ agent(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ barrel(X1,X2)
    | ~ present(X1,X2)
    | ~ event(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,skf13(X1,X6),X6)
    | ssSkC0 ),
    c_0_109,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_121,negated_conjecture,
    down(skc33,skc35,skc36),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_110,c_0_111]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_122,negated_conjecture,
    lonely(skc33,skc36),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_112,c_0_111]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_123,negated_conjecture,
    street(skc33,skc36),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_113,c_0_111]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_124,negated_conjecture,
    event(skc33,skc35),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_114,c_0_111]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_125,negated_conjecture,
    present(skc33,skc35),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_115,c_0_111]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_126,negated_conjecture,
    barrel(skc33,skc35),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_116,c_0_111]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_127,negated_conjecture,
    actual_world(skc33),
    clause1,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_128,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ actual_world(X1)
    | ~ ssSkP0(X7,X1)
    | ~ two(X1,X7)
    | ~ group(X1,X7)
    | ~ fellow(X1,skf13(X1,X6))
    | ~ young(X1,skf13(X1,X6))
    | ~ placename(X1,X5)
    | ~ hollywood_placename(X1,X5)
    | ~ of(X1,X5,X4)
    | ~ city(X1,X4)
    | ~ street(X1,X4)
    | ~ lonely(X1,X4)
    | ~ down(X1,X2,X4)
    | ~ in(X1,X2,X4)
    | ~ chevy(X1,X3)
    | ~ white(X1,X3)
    | ~ dirty(X1,X3)
    | ~ old(X1,X3)
    | ~ agent(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ barrel(X1,X2)
    | ~ present(X1,X2)
    | ~ event(X1,X2)
    | ssSkC0 ),
    c_0_117,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_129,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(skc33,X1,skc34)
    | young(skc33,X1)
    | ssSkC0 ),
    c_0_118,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_130,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(skc33,X1,skc34)
    | fellow(skc33,X1)
    | ssSkC0 ),
    c_0_119,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_148,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ old(skc33,X3)
    | ~ dirty(skc33,X3)
    | ~ white(skc33,X3)
    | ~ chevy(skc33,X3)
    | ~ hollywood_placename(skc33,X2)
    | ~ placename(skc33,X2)
    | ~ city(skc33,skc36)
    | ~ ssSkP0(X1,skc33)
    | ~ two(skc33,X1)
    | ~ group(skc33,X1)
    | ~ agent(skc33,skc35,X3)
    | ~ in(skc33,skc35,skc36)
    | ~ of(skc33,X2,skc36)
    | member(skc33,skf13(skc33,X1),X1) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_120,c_0_121]),c_0_122]),c_0_123]),c_0_124]),c_0_125]),c_0_126]),c_0_127])]),c_0_111]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_149,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ old(skc33,X5)
    | ~ dirty(skc33,X5)
    | ~ white(skc33,X5)
    | ~ chevy(skc33,X5)
    | ~ barrel(skc33,X2)
    | ~ present(skc33,X2)
    | ~ event(skc33,X2)
    | ~ hollywood_placename(skc33,X4)
    | ~ placename(skc33,X4)
    | ~ city(skc33,X3)
    | ~ street(skc33,X3)
    | ~ lonely(skc33,X3)
    | ~ ssSkP0(X6,skc33)
    | ~ two(skc33,X6)
    | ~ group(skc33,X6)
    | ~ agent(skc33,X2,X5)
    | ~ in(skc33,X2,X3)
    | ~ of(skc33,X4,X3)
    | ~ down(skc33,X2,X3)
    | ~ member(skc33,skf13(skc33,X1),skc34)
    | ssSkC0 ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_128,c_0_129]),c_0_127])]),c_0_130]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_150,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssSkP0(X3,X1)
    | ~ frontseat(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X2,X3)
    | be(X1,skf8(X1,X2),X2,skf7(X2,X1)) ),
    c_0_131,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_151,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ state(X1,X4)
    | ~ be(X1,X4,skf11(X1,X3),X2)
    | ~ in(X1,X2,skf11(X1,X3))
    | ssSkP0(X5,X1) ),
    c_0_132,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_152,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssSkP0(X3,X1)
    | ~ frontseat(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X2,X3)
    | in(X1,skf7(X2,X1),X2) ),
    c_0_133,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_153,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ ssSkP0(X3,X1)
    | ~ frontseat(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X2,X3)
    | state(X1,skf8(X1,X4)) ),
    c_0_134,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_154,negated_conjecture,
    ( frontseat(X2,skf11(X2,X3))
    | ssSkP0(X1,X2) ),
    clause41,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_155,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(X2,skf11(X2,X1),X1)
    | ssSkP0(X1,X2) ),
    clause42,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_156,negated_conjecture,
    of(skc33,skc37,skc38),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_135,c_0_111]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_157,negated_conjecture,
    in(skc33,skc35,skc38),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_136,c_0_111]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_158,negated_conjecture,
    agent(skc33,skc35,skc39),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_137,c_0_111]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_159,negated_conjecture,
    group(skc33,skc34),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_138,c_0_111]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_160,negated_conjecture,
    two(skc33,skc34),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_139,c_0_111]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_161,negated_conjecture,
    ssSkP0(skc34,skc33),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_140,c_0_111]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_162,negated_conjecture,
    city(skc33,skc38),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_141,c_0_111]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_163,negated_conjecture,
    placename(skc33,skc37),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_142,c_0_111]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_164,negated_conjecture,
    hollywood_placename(skc33,skc37),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_143,c_0_111]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_165,negated_conjecture,
    chevy(skc33,skc39),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_144,c_0_111]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_166,negated_conjecture,
    white(skc33,skc39),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_145,c_0_111]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_167,negated_conjecture,
    dirty(skc33,skc39),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_146,c_0_111]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_168,negated_conjecture,
    old(skc33,skc39),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_147,c_0_111]),
    [final] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : NLP136-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:43:04 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.08/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.08/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.08/0.44  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.08/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.08/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.44  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.08/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.44  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.44  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 1432234 completed with status 1
% 0.08/0.44  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.08/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.08/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.44  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.08/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.08/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.08/0.44  % Search class: FGHNF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.08/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.08/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.44  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.44  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with pid 1432241 completed with status 1
% 0.08/0.44  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y
% 0.08/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.08/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.08/0.44  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.08/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.08/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.08/0.44  % Search class: FGHNF-FFMM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.08/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.08/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.44  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.08/0.44  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.08/0.44  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.08/0.44  
% 0.08/0.44  % No proof found!
% 0.08/0.44  % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.08/0.44  % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.08/0.44  % Parsed axioms                        : 54
% 0.08/0.44  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.08/0.44  % Initial clauses                      : 54
% 0.08/0.44  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.08/0.44  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 54
% 0.08/0.44  % Processed clauses                    : 142
% 0.08/0.44  % ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.08/0.44  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.08/0.44  % ...remaining for further processing  : 141
% 0.08/0.44  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.08/0.44  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.08/0.44  % Backward-subsumed                    : 34
% 0.08/0.44  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.08/0.44  % Generated clauses                    : 41
% 0.08/0.44  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 36
% 0.08/0.44  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.08/0.44  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 38
% 0.08/0.44  % Paramodulations                      : 22
% 0.08/0.44  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.08/0.44  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.08/0.44  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.08/0.44  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.08/0.44  % Total rewrite steps                  : 14
% 0.08/0.44  % ...of those cached                   : 7
% 0.08/0.44  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.08/0.44  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.08/0.44  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.08/0.44  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.08/0.44  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.08/0.44  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.08/0.44  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.08/0.44  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.08/0.44  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.08/0.44  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.08/0.44  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.08/0.44  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.08/0.44  % Current number of processed clauses  : 34
% 0.08/0.44  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 21
% 0.08/0.44  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.08/0.44  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.08/0.44  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 12
% 0.08/0.44  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.08/0.44  % ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.08/0.44  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.08/0.44  % Current number of archived clauses   : 107
% 0.08/0.44  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 6778
% 0.08/0.44  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1035
% 0.08/0.44  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 48
% 0.08/0.44  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 113
% 0.08/0.44  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.08/0.44  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.08/0.44  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.08/0.44  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.08/0.44  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.08/0.44  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 4806
% 0.08/0.44  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 209
% 0.08/0.44  
% 0.08/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.08/0.44  % User time                : 0.009 s
% 0.08/0.44  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.08/0.44  % Total time               : 0.013 s
% 0.08/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 3692 pages
% 0.08/0.44  
% 0.08/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.08/0.44  % User time                : 0.044 s
% 0.08/0.44  % System time              : 0.014 s
% 0.08/0.44  % Total time               : 0.057 s
% 0.08/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.08/0.44  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------