%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Princess---230619 % Problem : NLP143+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % Computer : n021.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Thu Aug 31 10:04:11 EDT 2023 % Result : Theorem 10.01s 2.12s % Output : Proof 15.21s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.13 % Problem : NLP143+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.4.0. % 0.00/0.13 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Thu Aug 24 11:07:55 EDT 2023 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.20/0.61 ________ _____ % 0.20/0.61 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________ % 0.20/0.61 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/ % 0.20/0.61 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ ) % 0.20/0.61 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/ % 0.20/0.61 % 0.20/0.61 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic % 0.20/0.61 (2023-06-19) % 0.20/0.61 % 0.20/0.61 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023 % 0.20/0.61 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen, % 0.20/0.61 Amanda Stjerna. % 0.20/0.61 Free software under BSD-3-Clause. % 0.20/0.61 % 0.20/0.61 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml % 0.20/0.61 % 0.20/0.61 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.20/0.62 Running up to 7 provers in parallel. % 0.20/0.64 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893 % 0.20/0.64 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996 % 0.20/0.64 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994 % 0.20/0.64 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423 % 0.20/0.64 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696 % 0.20/0.64 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288 % 0.20/0.64 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365 % 3.40/1.22 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 3.40/1.22 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 3.64/1.25 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 3.64/1.25 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 3.64/1.25 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 3.64/1.25 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 3.64/1.25 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 6.34/1.66 Prover 5: Proving ... % 6.34/1.66 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ... % 7.77/1.86 Prover 6: Proving ... % 8.47/1.92 Prover 0: Proving ... % 8.47/1.92 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 8.47/1.95 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 9.28/2.01 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 10.01/2.12 Prover 2: proved (1478ms) % 10.01/2.12 % 10.01/2.12 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 10.01/2.12 % 10.01/2.12 Prover 6: stopped % 10.01/2.13 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470 % 10.01/2.13 Prover 5: stopped % 10.01/2.14 Prover 0: stopped % 10.01/2.15 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089 % 10.01/2.15 Prover 3: stopped % 10.01/2.15 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125 % 10.01/2.15 Prover 13: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1138197443 % 10.01/2.15 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984 % 10.01/2.16 Prover 1: gave up % 10.01/2.17 Prover 16: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=completeFrugal -randomSeed=-2043353683 % 10.69/2.22 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 10.69/2.27 Prover 8: Preprocessing ... % 10.69/2.28 Prover 10: Preprocessing ... % 11.46/2.31 Prover 11: Preprocessing ... % 11.46/2.31 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ... % 11.46/2.32 Prover 13: Preprocessing ... % 11.46/2.34 Prover 16: Preprocessing ... % 11.46/2.39 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ... % 12.58/2.49 Prover 16: Constructing countermodel ... % 12.92/2.52 Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ... % 14.29/2.70 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 14.29/2.72 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ... % 14.29/2.75 Prover 7: Found proof (size 23) % 14.29/2.75 Prover 7: proved (632ms) % 14.29/2.75 Prover 16: stopped % 14.29/2.75 Prover 4: stopped % 14.29/2.75 Prover 13: stopped % 14.76/2.75 Prover 10: Found proof (size 24) % 14.76/2.75 Prover 10: proved (617ms) % 14.79/2.76 Prover 8: stopped % 14.79/2.78 Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ... % 14.79/2.79 Prover 11: stopped % 14.79/2.79 % 14.79/2.79 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 14.79/2.79 % 14.79/2.79 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 14.79/2.80 Assumptions after simplification: % 14.79/2.80 --------------------------------- % 14.79/2.80 % 14.79/2.80 (ax1) % 15.01/2.80 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ furniture(v0, v1) | % 15.01/2.80 instrumentality(v0, v1)) % 15.01/2.80 % 15.01/2.80 (ax16) % 15.01/2.80 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ object(v0, v1) | % 15.01/2.80 unisex(v0, v1)) % 15.01/2.80 % 15.01/2.80 (ax2) % 15.01/2.81 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ seat(v0, v1) | % 15.01/2.81 furniture(v0, v1)) % 15.01/2.81 % 15.01/2.81 (ax20) % 15.01/2.81 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ artifact(v0, v1) | % 15.01/2.81 object(v0, v1)) % 15.01/2.81 % 15.01/2.81 (ax21) % 15.01/2.81 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ instrumentality(v0, % 15.01/2.81 v1) | artifact(v0, v1)) % 15.01/2.81 % 15.01/2.81 (ax3) % 15.01/2.81 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ frontseat(v0, v1) | % 15.01/2.81 seat(v0, v1)) % 15.01/2.81 % 15.01/2.81 (ax37) % 15.01/2.81 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ man(v0, v1) | male(v0, % 15.01/2.81 v1)) % 15.01/2.81 % 15.01/2.81 (ax49) % 15.01/2.81 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ fellow(v0, v1) | % 15.01/2.81 man(v0, v1)) % 15.01/2.81 % 15.01/2.81 (ax56) % 15.01/2.81 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ male(v0, v1) | ~ % 15.01/2.81 unisex(v0, v1)) % 15.01/2.81 % 15.01/2.81 (ax59) % 15.01/2.81 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v3 = v2 | ~ $i(v3) | % 15.01/2.81 ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ be(v0, v1, v2, v3)) % 15.01/2.81 % 15.01/2.81 (ax60) % 15.01/2.82 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : (v3 = v2 | ~ $i(v3) | % 15.01/2.82 ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ member(v0, v3, v1) | ~ member(v0, % 15.01/2.82 v2, v1) | two(v0, v1) | ? [v4: $i] : ( ~ (v4 = v3) & ~ (v4 = v2) & % 15.01/2.82 $i(v4) & member(v0, v4, v1))) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | % 15.01/2.82 ~ $i(v0) | ~ two(v0, v1) | ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: $i] : ( ~ (v3 = v2) & % 15.01/2.82 $i(v3) & $i(v2) & member(v0, v3, v1) & member(v0, v2, v1) & ! [v4: $i] : % 15.01/2.82 (v4 = v3 | v4 = v2 | ~ $i(v4) | ~ member(v0, v4, v1)))) % 15.01/2.82 % 15.01/2.82 (co1) % 15.01/2.82 ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: $i] : ? [v5: % 15.01/2.82 $i] : ($i(v5) & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0) & in(v0, v4, v2) % 15.01/2.82 & down(v0, v4, v3) & present(v0, v4) & agent(v0, v4, v2) & lonely(v0, v3) & % 15.01/2.82 dirty(v0, v2) & white(v0, v2) & actual_world(v0) & of(v0, v1, v2) & old(v0, % 15.01/2.82 v2) & group(v0, v5) & two(v0, v5) & event(v0, v4) & barrel(v0, v4) & % 15.01/2.82 chevy(v0, v2) & street(v0, v3) & placename(v0, v1) & hollywood_placename(v0, % 15.01/2.82 v1) & city(v0, v2) & ! [v6: $i] : ( ~ $i(v6) | ~ member(v0, v6, v5) | % 15.01/2.82 young(v0, v6)) & ! [v6: $i] : ( ~ $i(v6) | ~ member(v0, v6, v5) | % 15.01/2.82 fellow(v0, v6)) & ! [v6: $i] : ( ~ $i(v6) | ~ member(v0, v6, v5) | ? % 15.01/2.82 [v7: $i] : ? [v8: $i] : ($i(v8) & $i(v7) & in(v0, v8, v8) & be(v0, v7, % 15.01/2.82 v6, v8) & state(v0, v7) & frontseat(v0, v8)))) % 15.01/2.82 % 15.01/2.82 Further assumptions not needed in the proof: % 15.01/2.82 -------------------------------------------- % 15.01/2.82 ax10, ax11, ax12, ax13, ax14, ax15, ax17, ax18, ax19, ax22, ax23, ax24, ax25, % 15.01/2.82 ax26, ax27, ax28, ax29, ax30, ax31, ax32, ax33, ax34, ax35, ax36, ax38, ax39, % 15.01/2.82 ax4, ax40, ax41, ax42, ax43, ax44, ax45, ax46, ax47, ax48, ax5, ax50, ax51, % 15.01/2.82 ax52, ax53, ax54, ax55, ax57, ax58, ax6, ax61, ax7, ax8, ax9 % 15.01/2.82 % 15.01/2.82 Those formulas are unsatisfiable: % 15.01/2.82 --------------------------------- % 15.01/2.82 % 15.01/2.82 Begin of proof % 15.01/2.82 | % 15.01/2.82 | ALPHA: (ax60) implies: % 15.01/2.83 | (1) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ two(v0, v1) | % 15.01/2.83 | ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: $i] : ( ~ (v3 = v2) & $i(v3) & $i(v2) & % 15.01/2.83 | member(v0, v3, v1) & member(v0, v2, v1) & ! [v4: $i] : (v4 = v3 | % 15.01/2.83 | v4 = v2 | ~ $i(v4) | ~ member(v0, v4, v1)))) % 15.01/2.83 | % 15.01/2.83 | DELTA: instantiating (co1) with fresh symbols all_63_0, all_63_1, all_63_2, % 15.01/2.83 | all_63_3, all_63_4, all_63_5 gives: % 15.01/2.83 | (2) $i(all_63_0) & $i(all_63_1) & $i(all_63_2) & $i(all_63_3) & % 15.01/2.83 | $i(all_63_4) & $i(all_63_5) & in(all_63_5, all_63_1, all_63_3) & % 15.01/2.83 | down(all_63_5, all_63_1, all_63_2) & present(all_63_5, all_63_1) & % 15.01/2.83 | agent(all_63_5, all_63_1, all_63_3) & lonely(all_63_5, all_63_2) & % 15.01/2.83 | dirty(all_63_5, all_63_3) & white(all_63_5, all_63_3) & % 15.01/2.83 | actual_world(all_63_5) & of(all_63_5, all_63_4, all_63_3) & % 15.01/2.83 | old(all_63_5, all_63_3) & group(all_63_5, all_63_0) & two(all_63_5, % 15.01/2.83 | all_63_0) & event(all_63_5, all_63_1) & barrel(all_63_5, all_63_1) & % 15.01/2.83 | chevy(all_63_5, all_63_3) & street(all_63_5, all_63_2) & % 15.01/2.83 | placename(all_63_5, all_63_4) & hollywood_placename(all_63_5, all_63_4) % 15.01/2.83 | & city(all_63_5, all_63_3) & ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) | ~ % 15.01/2.83 | member(all_63_5, v0, all_63_0) | young(all_63_5, v0)) & ! [v0: $i] : % 15.01/2.83 | ( ~ $i(v0) | ~ member(all_63_5, v0, all_63_0) | fellow(all_63_5, v0)) % 15.01/2.83 | & ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) | ~ member(all_63_5, v0, all_63_0) | ? % 15.01/2.83 | [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : ($i(v2) & $i(v1) & in(all_63_5, v2, v2) & % 15.01/2.83 | be(all_63_5, v1, v0, v2) & state(all_63_5, v1) & % 15.01/2.83 | frontseat(all_63_5, v2))) % 15.01/2.83 | % 15.01/2.83 | ALPHA: (2) implies: % 15.01/2.83 | (3) two(all_63_5, all_63_0) % 15.01/2.83 | (4) $i(all_63_5) % 15.01/2.83 | (5) $i(all_63_0) % 15.01/2.83 | (6) ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) | ~ member(all_63_5, v0, all_63_0) | ? [v1: % 15.01/2.83 | $i] : ? [v2: $i] : ($i(v2) & $i(v1) & in(all_63_5, v2, v2) & % 15.01/2.83 | be(all_63_5, v1, v0, v2) & state(all_63_5, v1) & % 15.01/2.83 | frontseat(all_63_5, v2))) % 15.01/2.84 | (7) ! [v0: $i] : ( ~ $i(v0) | ~ member(all_63_5, v0, all_63_0) | % 15.01/2.84 | fellow(all_63_5, v0)) % 15.01/2.84 | % 15.01/2.84 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_63_5, all_63_0, simplifying with (3), % 15.01/2.84 | (4), (5) gives: % 15.01/2.84 | (8) ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ( ~ (v1 = v0) & $i(v1) & $i(v0) & % 15.01/2.84 | member(all_63_5, v1, all_63_0) & member(all_63_5, v0, all_63_0) & ! % 15.01/2.84 | [v2: $i] : (v2 = v1 | v2 = v0 | ~ $i(v2) | ~ member(all_63_5, v2, % 15.01/2.84 | all_63_0))) % 15.01/2.84 | % 15.01/2.84 | DELTA: instantiating (8) with fresh symbols all_72_0, all_72_1 gives: % 15.01/2.84 | (9) ~ (all_72_0 = all_72_1) & $i(all_72_0) & $i(all_72_1) & % 15.01/2.84 | member(all_63_5, all_72_0, all_63_0) & member(all_63_5, all_72_1, % 15.01/2.84 | all_63_0) & ! [v0: any] : (v0 = all_72_0 | v0 = all_72_1 | ~ $i(v0) % 15.01/2.84 | | ~ member(all_63_5, v0, all_63_0)) % 15.01/2.84 | % 15.01/2.84 | ALPHA: (9) implies: % 15.01/2.84 | (10) member(all_63_5, all_72_0, all_63_0) % 15.01/2.84 | (11) $i(all_72_0) % 15.01/2.84 | % 15.01/2.84 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (7) with all_72_0, simplifying with (10), (11) % 15.01/2.84 | gives: % 15.01/2.84 | (12) fellow(all_63_5, all_72_0) % 15.01/2.84 | % 15.01/2.84 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (6) with all_72_0, simplifying with (10), (11) % 15.01/2.84 | gives: % 15.01/2.84 | (13) ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ($i(v1) & $i(v0) & in(all_63_5, v1, v1) & % 15.01/2.84 | be(all_63_5, v0, all_72_0, v1) & state(all_63_5, v0) & % 15.21/2.84 | frontseat(all_63_5, v1)) % 15.21/2.84 | % 15.21/2.84 | DELTA: instantiating (13) with fresh symbols all_81_0, all_81_1 gives: % 15.21/2.84 | (14) $i(all_81_0) & $i(all_81_1) & in(all_63_5, all_81_0, all_81_0) & % 15.21/2.84 | be(all_63_5, all_81_1, all_72_0, all_81_0) & state(all_63_5, all_81_1) % 15.21/2.84 | & frontseat(all_63_5, all_81_0) % 15.21/2.84 | % 15.21/2.84 | ALPHA: (14) implies: % 15.21/2.84 | (15) frontseat(all_63_5, all_81_0) % 15.21/2.84 | (16) be(all_63_5, all_81_1, all_72_0, all_81_0) % 15.21/2.84 | (17) $i(all_81_1) % 15.21/2.84 | (18) $i(all_81_0) % 15.21/2.84 | % 15.21/2.84 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ax3) with all_63_5, all_81_0, simplifying with % 15.21/2.84 | (4), (15), (18) gives: % 15.21/2.84 | (19) seat(all_63_5, all_81_0) % 15.21/2.84 | % 15.21/2.84 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ax49) with all_63_5, all_72_0, simplifying with % 15.21/2.84 | (4), (11), (12) gives: % 15.21/2.84 | (20) man(all_63_5, all_72_0) % 15.21/2.84 | % 15.21/2.84 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ax59) with all_63_5, all_81_1, all_72_0, all_81_0, % 15.21/2.84 | simplifying with (4), (11), (16), (17), (18) gives: % 15.21/2.84 | (21) all_81_0 = all_72_0 % 15.21/2.84 | % 15.21/2.84 | REDUCE: (19), (21) imply: % 15.21/2.84 | (22) seat(all_63_5, all_72_0) % 15.21/2.84 | % 15.21/2.84 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ax2) with all_63_5, all_72_0, simplifying with % 15.21/2.84 | (4), (11), (22) gives: % 15.21/2.84 | (23) furniture(all_63_5, all_72_0) % 15.21/2.84 | % 15.21/2.84 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ax37) with all_63_5, all_72_0, simplifying with % 15.21/2.84 | (4), (11), (20) gives: % 15.21/2.84 | (24) male(all_63_5, all_72_0) % 15.21/2.84 | % 15.21/2.85 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ax1) with all_63_5, all_72_0, simplifying with % 15.21/2.85 | (4), (11), (23) gives: % 15.21/2.85 | (25) instrumentality(all_63_5, all_72_0) % 15.21/2.85 | % 15.21/2.85 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ax56) with all_63_5, all_72_0, simplifying with % 15.21/2.85 | (4), (11), (24) gives: % 15.21/2.85 | (26) ~ unisex(all_63_5, all_72_0) % 15.21/2.85 | % 15.21/2.85 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ax21) with all_63_5, all_72_0, simplifying with % 15.21/2.85 | (4), (11), (25) gives: % 15.21/2.85 | (27) artifact(all_63_5, all_72_0) % 15.21/2.85 | % 15.21/2.85 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ax20) with all_63_5, all_72_0, simplifying with % 15.21/2.85 | (4), (11), (27) gives: % 15.21/2.85 | (28) object(all_63_5, all_72_0) % 15.21/2.85 | % 15.21/2.85 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (ax16) with all_63_5, all_72_0, simplifying with % 15.21/2.85 | (4), (11), (26), (28) gives: % 15.21/2.85 | (29) $false % 15.21/2.85 | % 15.21/2.85 | CLOSE: (29) is inconsistent. % 15.21/2.85 | % 15.21/2.85 End of proof % 15.21/2.85 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 15.21/2.85 % 15.21/2.85 2237ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------